Open innovation: current status and research opportunities

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

Standard

Open innovation : current status and research opportunities. / West, Joel; Bogers, Marcel.

In: Innovation: Organization & Management, Vol. 19, No. 1, 2017, p. 43-50 .

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

West, J & Bogers, M 2017, 'Open innovation: current status and research opportunities', Innovation: Organization & Management, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 43-50 . https://doi.org/10.1080/14479338.2016.1258995

APA

West, J., & Bogers, M. (2017). Open innovation: current status and research opportunities. Innovation: Organization & Management, 19(1), 43-50 . https://doi.org/10.1080/14479338.2016.1258995

Vancouver

West J, Bogers M. Open innovation: current status and research opportunities. Innovation: Organization & Management. 2017;19(1):43-50 . https://doi.org/10.1080/14479338.2016.1258995

Author

West, Joel ; Bogers, Marcel. / Open innovation : current status and research opportunities. In: Innovation: Organization & Management. 2017 ; Vol. 19, No. 1. pp. 43-50 .

Bibtex

@article{0cccf856eb1d406080af564b511a1ceb,
title = "Open innovation: current status and research opportunities",
abstract = "Interest in open innovation (OI) as a field of research has grown exponentially since the phrase was coined by Chesbrough in his 2003 book, with numerous articles, special issues, books, and conference sessions. Various reviews of the literature have summarized prior work, offered new frameworks, and identified opportunities for future research. Here we summarize these opportunities, which include more research on outbound OI, the role of open innovation in services, and network forms of collaboration such as consortia, communities, ecosystems, and platforms. Research should also examine the use of OI by small, new, and not-for-profit organizations, as well as the linkage of individual actions and motivations to open innovation. Other opportunities include better measuring the costs, benefits, antecedents, mediators and moderators of the effects of OI on performance, and understanding why and how OI is rejected, abandoned, or fails. Finally, we consider how OI can be better linked to prior theoretical research, including topics such as absorptive capacity, user innovation, resources, dynamic capabilities, business models, and the definition of the firm.",
author = "Joel West and Marcel Bogers",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1080/14479338.2016.1258995",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "43--50 ",
journal = "Innovation: Management, Policy and Practice",
issn = "1447-9338",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Open innovation

T2 - current status and research opportunities

AU - West, Joel

AU - Bogers, Marcel

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Interest in open innovation (OI) as a field of research has grown exponentially since the phrase was coined by Chesbrough in his 2003 book, with numerous articles, special issues, books, and conference sessions. Various reviews of the literature have summarized prior work, offered new frameworks, and identified opportunities for future research. Here we summarize these opportunities, which include more research on outbound OI, the role of open innovation in services, and network forms of collaboration such as consortia, communities, ecosystems, and platforms. Research should also examine the use of OI by small, new, and not-for-profit organizations, as well as the linkage of individual actions and motivations to open innovation. Other opportunities include better measuring the costs, benefits, antecedents, mediators and moderators of the effects of OI on performance, and understanding why and how OI is rejected, abandoned, or fails. Finally, we consider how OI can be better linked to prior theoretical research, including topics such as absorptive capacity, user innovation, resources, dynamic capabilities, business models, and the definition of the firm.

AB - Interest in open innovation (OI) as a field of research has grown exponentially since the phrase was coined by Chesbrough in his 2003 book, with numerous articles, special issues, books, and conference sessions. Various reviews of the literature have summarized prior work, offered new frameworks, and identified opportunities for future research. Here we summarize these opportunities, which include more research on outbound OI, the role of open innovation in services, and network forms of collaboration such as consortia, communities, ecosystems, and platforms. Research should also examine the use of OI by small, new, and not-for-profit organizations, as well as the linkage of individual actions and motivations to open innovation. Other opportunities include better measuring the costs, benefits, antecedents, mediators and moderators of the effects of OI on performance, and understanding why and how OI is rejected, abandoned, or fails. Finally, we consider how OI can be better linked to prior theoretical research, including topics such as absorptive capacity, user innovation, resources, dynamic capabilities, business models, and the definition of the firm.

U2 - 10.1080/14479338.2016.1258995

DO - 10.1080/14479338.2016.1258995

M3 - Journal article

VL - 19

SP - 43

EP - 50

JO - Innovation: Management, Policy and Practice

JF - Innovation: Management, Policy and Practice

SN - 1447-9338

IS - 1

ER -

ID: 169758163