Quests for justice and mechanisms of suppression in Flint, Michigan

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Quests for justice and mechanisms of suppression in Flint, Michigan. / Rutt, Rebecca Leigh; Bluwstein, Jevgeniy.

In: Environmental Justice, Vol. 10, No. 2, 2017, p. 27-35.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Rutt, RL & Bluwstein, J 2017, 'Quests for justice and mechanisms of suppression in Flint, Michigan', Environmental Justice, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 27-35. https://doi.org/10.1089/env.2016.0047

APA

Rutt, R. L., & Bluwstein, J. (2017). Quests for justice and mechanisms of suppression in Flint, Michigan. Environmental Justice, 10(2), 27-35. https://doi.org/10.1089/env.2016.0047

Vancouver

Rutt RL, Bluwstein J. Quests for justice and mechanisms of suppression in Flint, Michigan. Environmental Justice. 2017;10(2):27-35. https://doi.org/10.1089/env.2016.0047

Author

Rutt, Rebecca Leigh ; Bluwstein, Jevgeniy. / Quests for justice and mechanisms of suppression in Flint, Michigan. In: Environmental Justice. 2017 ; Vol. 10, No. 2. pp. 27-35.

Bibtex

@article{73efde1fa849476dab5a06cccc229163,
title = "Quests for justice and mechanisms of suppression in Flint, Michigan",
abstract = "There is widespread acknowledgment of the crisis nature and injustices around water quality and access in Flint since mid-2014. This crisis led to different forms of grassroots activism demanding political accountability, transparency, and redress. However, residents' experiences and their needs and demands in response to the crisis have been largely ignored. This article explores the mechanisms of suppression at work in obscuring these needs and demands. Specifically, it sheds light on the role of the public sector, the media, and the academic institutions in reproducing these mechanisms of suppression. The article situates the struggles over political accountability within the neoliberalization of public administration and government through emergency management. Capital accumulation can continue and intensifies, whereas emergency management further contributes to suppressing public dissent in the times of crisis via the erosion of political accountability. By illuminating institutionalized mechanisms of suppression of residents' needs and demands, we argue that the Flint water crisis should also be seen as a crisis of government, journalism, and academia.",
author = "Rutt, {Rebecca Leigh} and Jevgeniy Bluwstein",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1089/env.2016.0047",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
pages = "27--35",
journal = "Environmental Justice",
issn = "1939-4071",
publisher = "Mary AnnLiebert, Inc. Publishers",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Quests for justice and mechanisms of suppression in Flint, Michigan

AU - Rutt, Rebecca Leigh

AU - Bluwstein, Jevgeniy

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - There is widespread acknowledgment of the crisis nature and injustices around water quality and access in Flint since mid-2014. This crisis led to different forms of grassroots activism demanding political accountability, transparency, and redress. However, residents' experiences and their needs and demands in response to the crisis have been largely ignored. This article explores the mechanisms of suppression at work in obscuring these needs and demands. Specifically, it sheds light on the role of the public sector, the media, and the academic institutions in reproducing these mechanisms of suppression. The article situates the struggles over political accountability within the neoliberalization of public administration and government through emergency management. Capital accumulation can continue and intensifies, whereas emergency management further contributes to suppressing public dissent in the times of crisis via the erosion of political accountability. By illuminating institutionalized mechanisms of suppression of residents' needs and demands, we argue that the Flint water crisis should also be seen as a crisis of government, journalism, and academia.

AB - There is widespread acknowledgment of the crisis nature and injustices around water quality and access in Flint since mid-2014. This crisis led to different forms of grassroots activism demanding political accountability, transparency, and redress. However, residents' experiences and their needs and demands in response to the crisis have been largely ignored. This article explores the mechanisms of suppression at work in obscuring these needs and demands. Specifically, it sheds light on the role of the public sector, the media, and the academic institutions in reproducing these mechanisms of suppression. The article situates the struggles over political accountability within the neoliberalization of public administration and government through emergency management. Capital accumulation can continue and intensifies, whereas emergency management further contributes to suppressing public dissent in the times of crisis via the erosion of political accountability. By illuminating institutionalized mechanisms of suppression of residents' needs and demands, we argue that the Flint water crisis should also be seen as a crisis of government, journalism, and academia.

U2 - 10.1089/env.2016.0047

DO - 10.1089/env.2016.0047

M3 - Journal article

VL - 10

SP - 27

EP - 35

JO - Environmental Justice

JF - Environmental Justice

SN - 1939-4071

IS - 2

ER -

ID: 176659667