Ch'ixi landscapes: indigeneity and capitalism in the Bolivian Chaco

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Ch'ixi landscapes : indigeneity and capitalism in the Bolivian Chaco. / Anthias, Penelope Fay.

In: Geoforum, Vol. 82, 2017, p. 268-275.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Anthias, PF 2017, 'Ch'ixi landscapes: indigeneity and capitalism in the Bolivian Chaco', Geoforum, vol. 82, pp. 268-275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2016.09.013

APA

Anthias, P. F. (2017). Ch'ixi landscapes: indigeneity and capitalism in the Bolivian Chaco. Geoforum, 82, 268-275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2016.09.013

Vancouver

Anthias PF. Ch'ixi landscapes: indigeneity and capitalism in the Bolivian Chaco. Geoforum. 2017;82:268-275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2016.09.013

Author

Anthias, Penelope Fay. / Ch'ixi landscapes : indigeneity and capitalism in the Bolivian Chaco. In: Geoforum. 2017 ; Vol. 82. pp. 268-275.

Bibtex

@article{0aa1290b7b8e40f18c917aca81ddb454,
title = "Ch'ixi landscapes: indigeneity and capitalism in the Bolivian Chaco",
abstract = "Contemporary debates around the ontological turn have pitted efforts to take indigenous ontologies seriously against demands to make visible the forms of dispossession and environmental suffering that characterize the (post)colonial and capitalist present. Meanwhile, a growing array of governmental projects seeks to identify and protect indigenous ontologies in the face of capitalist development processes, including through forms of collective tenure. How can we make sense of such initiatives, and what kind of territories do they encounter and produce? This paper engages this question ethnographically through an examination of everyday life in a legally recognized Native Community Land in the Bolivian Chaco. Drawing on Bolivian Aymara scholar Silvia Rivera Cusicanqui{\textquoteright}s notion of ch{\textquoteright}ixi, I argue that indigenous territories are neither ontologically separate from, nor entirely subsumed by, capitalist development processes. Rather, they are subject to multiple land values, ontologies, and investments. A contested indigenous land titling process, capitalist labor relations, hydrocarbon compensation money, and efforts to maintain relations with spirit beings are all interwoven in the fabric of Guaran{\'i} everyday life. Such ch{\textquoteright}ixi landscapes emerge at the confluence of capitalist efforts at rendering territories investable, governmental efforts at managing dispossession, and Guaran{\'i} efforts to maintain life and exercise territorial sovereignty amidst contradictory processes of (post)colonial governmentality.",
keywords = "Faculty of Science, Indigenous , Indigeneity , Land , Ontology , Territory, Bolivia ",
author = "Anthias, {Penelope Fay}",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1016/j.geoforum.2016.09.013",
language = "English",
volume = "82",
pages = "268--275",
journal = "Geoforum",
issn = "0016-7185",
publisher = "Pergamon Press",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ch'ixi landscapes

T2 - indigeneity and capitalism in the Bolivian Chaco

AU - Anthias, Penelope Fay

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Contemporary debates around the ontological turn have pitted efforts to take indigenous ontologies seriously against demands to make visible the forms of dispossession and environmental suffering that characterize the (post)colonial and capitalist present. Meanwhile, a growing array of governmental projects seeks to identify and protect indigenous ontologies in the face of capitalist development processes, including through forms of collective tenure. How can we make sense of such initiatives, and what kind of territories do they encounter and produce? This paper engages this question ethnographically through an examination of everyday life in a legally recognized Native Community Land in the Bolivian Chaco. Drawing on Bolivian Aymara scholar Silvia Rivera Cusicanqui’s notion of ch’ixi, I argue that indigenous territories are neither ontologically separate from, nor entirely subsumed by, capitalist development processes. Rather, they are subject to multiple land values, ontologies, and investments. A contested indigenous land titling process, capitalist labor relations, hydrocarbon compensation money, and efforts to maintain relations with spirit beings are all interwoven in the fabric of Guaraní everyday life. Such ch’ixi landscapes emerge at the confluence of capitalist efforts at rendering territories investable, governmental efforts at managing dispossession, and Guaraní efforts to maintain life and exercise territorial sovereignty amidst contradictory processes of (post)colonial governmentality.

AB - Contemporary debates around the ontological turn have pitted efforts to take indigenous ontologies seriously against demands to make visible the forms of dispossession and environmental suffering that characterize the (post)colonial and capitalist present. Meanwhile, a growing array of governmental projects seeks to identify and protect indigenous ontologies in the face of capitalist development processes, including through forms of collective tenure. How can we make sense of such initiatives, and what kind of territories do they encounter and produce? This paper engages this question ethnographically through an examination of everyday life in a legally recognized Native Community Land in the Bolivian Chaco. Drawing on Bolivian Aymara scholar Silvia Rivera Cusicanqui’s notion of ch’ixi, I argue that indigenous territories are neither ontologically separate from, nor entirely subsumed by, capitalist development processes. Rather, they are subject to multiple land values, ontologies, and investments. A contested indigenous land titling process, capitalist labor relations, hydrocarbon compensation money, and efforts to maintain relations with spirit beings are all interwoven in the fabric of Guaraní everyday life. Such ch’ixi landscapes emerge at the confluence of capitalist efforts at rendering territories investable, governmental efforts at managing dispossession, and Guaraní efforts to maintain life and exercise territorial sovereignty amidst contradictory processes of (post)colonial governmentality.

KW - Faculty of Science

KW - Indigenous

KW - Indigeneity

KW - Land

KW - Ontology

KW - Territory

KW - Bolivia

U2 - 10.1016/j.geoforum.2016.09.013

DO - 10.1016/j.geoforum.2016.09.013

M3 - Journal article

VL - 82

SP - 268

EP - 275

JO - Geoforum

JF - Geoforum

SN - 0016-7185

ER -

ID: 166946153