Staff at Department of Food and Resource Economics (IFRO) – University of Copenhagen

English > Staff

Forestry taxation for sustainability: theoretical ideals and empirical realities

Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

Standard

Forestry taxation for sustainability : theoretical ideals and empirical realities. / Hansen, Christian Pilegaard; Lund, Jens Friis.

In: Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, Vol. 32, 2018, p. 23-28.

Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Hansen, CP & Lund, JF 2018, 'Forestry taxation for sustainability: theoretical ideals and empirical realities' Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, vol. 32, pp. 23-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2018.03.002

APA

Hansen, C. P., & Lund, J. F. (2018). Forestry taxation for sustainability: theoretical ideals and empirical realities. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 32, 23-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2018.03.002

Vancouver

Hansen CP, Lund JF. Forestry taxation for sustainability: theoretical ideals and empirical realities. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 2018;32:23-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2018.03.002

Author

Hansen, Christian Pilegaard ; Lund, Jens Friis. / Forestry taxation for sustainability : theoretical ideals and empirical realities. In: Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 2018 ; Vol. 32. pp. 23-28.

Bibtex

@article{53f8c0bd005744ff838b5e22faa85e30,
title = "Forestry taxation for sustainability: theoretical ideals and empirical realities",
abstract = "We review the literature linking taxation and sustainable forest management (SFM) in humid tropical forests. This literature broadly falls in two strands. One emphasizes economic theoretical ideals and seeks to define optimal taxation designs with incentives for SFM. The other strand documents political-economic empirical realities that fall far from the theoretical ideals and which may help explaining why taxation reforms for SFM have had mixed outcomes. We conclude that future research could benefit from further integration and interaction between the two strands and argue for dynamic forest taxation policies that can respond to changing market demands, technologies, and context conditions to provide the right incentives and signals for SFM.",
author = "Hansen, {Christian Pilegaard} and Lund, {Jens Friis}",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.1016/j.cosust.2018.03.002",
language = "English",
volume = "32",
pages = "23--28",
journal = "Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability",
issn = "1877-3435",
publisher = "Elsevier Ltd. * Current Opinion Journals",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Forestry taxation for sustainability

T2 - Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability

AU - Hansen,Christian Pilegaard

AU - Lund,Jens Friis

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - We review the literature linking taxation and sustainable forest management (SFM) in humid tropical forests. This literature broadly falls in two strands. One emphasizes economic theoretical ideals and seeks to define optimal taxation designs with incentives for SFM. The other strand documents political-economic empirical realities that fall far from the theoretical ideals and which may help explaining why taxation reforms for SFM have had mixed outcomes. We conclude that future research could benefit from further integration and interaction between the two strands and argue for dynamic forest taxation policies that can respond to changing market demands, technologies, and context conditions to provide the right incentives and signals for SFM.

AB - We review the literature linking taxation and sustainable forest management (SFM) in humid tropical forests. This literature broadly falls in two strands. One emphasizes economic theoretical ideals and seeks to define optimal taxation designs with incentives for SFM. The other strand documents political-economic empirical realities that fall far from the theoretical ideals and which may help explaining why taxation reforms for SFM have had mixed outcomes. We conclude that future research could benefit from further integration and interaction between the two strands and argue for dynamic forest taxation policies that can respond to changing market demands, technologies, and context conditions to provide the right incentives and signals for SFM.

U2 - 10.1016/j.cosust.2018.03.002

DO - 10.1016/j.cosust.2018.03.002

M3 - Review

VL - 32

SP - 23

EP - 28

JO - Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability

JF - Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability

SN - 1877-3435

ER -

ID: 196259639