Getting stuck, falling behind or moving forward: rural livelihood movements and persistence in Nepal

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

Standard

Getting stuck, falling behind or moving forward : rural livelihood movements and persistence in Nepal. / Walelign, Solomon Zena.

In: Land Use Policy, Vol. 65, 2017, p. 294–307.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Walelign, SZ 2017, 'Getting stuck, falling behind or moving forward: rural livelihood movements and persistence in Nepal', Land Use Policy, vol. 65, pp. 294–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.04.017

APA

Walelign, S. Z. (2017). Getting stuck, falling behind or moving forward: rural livelihood movements and persistence in Nepal. Land Use Policy, 65, 294–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.04.017

Vancouver

Walelign SZ. Getting stuck, falling behind or moving forward: rural livelihood movements and persistence in Nepal. Land Use Policy. 2017;65:294–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.04.017

Author

Walelign, Solomon Zena. / Getting stuck, falling behind or moving forward : rural livelihood movements and persistence in Nepal. In: Land Use Policy. 2017 ; Vol. 65. pp. 294–307.

Bibtex

@article{0113e20acdbb447e9fd000b6015d1394,
title = "Getting stuck, falling behind or moving forward: rural livelihood movements and persistence in Nepal",
abstract = "Research on household livelihood dynamics is central to rural poverty reduction. In this paper, we adopt a three-wave panel dataset to explore the persistence of and transitions in household livelihoods in three districts of Nepal using duration and dynamic probit models. The results demonstrate that the livelihood strategies of rural households are dynamic: approximately 16 per cent of the sample households transitioned up to high-remunerative livelihood strategies, 10 per cent of the households shifted down to either low- or medium-remunerative livelihood strategies, and 69 per cent remained trapped in low-remunerative livelihood strategies. The major upward transition occurred from medium-remunerative strategies to high-remunerative strategies (14 per cent). Overall, 70 per cent of the households persisted in one of the three livelihood strategies, and the remaining 30 per cent changed their strategy at least once. This dynamic is associated with the households{\textquoteright} duration in a particular livelihood strategy and the various characteristics of households and household heads. Understanding livelihood movement, livelihood persistence and the associated covariates and targeting the poor on this basis is crucial to combating rural poverty and dismantling poverty traps. To this end, the present study suggests (i) strengthening physical and financial asset endowments to address low-remunerative strategies, (ii) improving infrastructure connectivity, particularly in remote and inaccessible areas, (iii) insuring against shocks, iv) enhancing opportunities for generating remittances and enabling petty trade, and (v) supporting the establishment of business ventures.",
author = "Walelign, {Solomon Zena}",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.04.017",
language = "English",
volume = "65",
pages = "294–307",
journal = "Land Use Policy",
issn = "0264-8377",
publisher = "Pergamon Press",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Getting stuck, falling behind or moving forward

T2 - rural livelihood movements and persistence in Nepal

AU - Walelign, Solomon Zena

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Research on household livelihood dynamics is central to rural poverty reduction. In this paper, we adopt a three-wave panel dataset to explore the persistence of and transitions in household livelihoods in three districts of Nepal using duration and dynamic probit models. The results demonstrate that the livelihood strategies of rural households are dynamic: approximately 16 per cent of the sample households transitioned up to high-remunerative livelihood strategies, 10 per cent of the households shifted down to either low- or medium-remunerative livelihood strategies, and 69 per cent remained trapped in low-remunerative livelihood strategies. The major upward transition occurred from medium-remunerative strategies to high-remunerative strategies (14 per cent). Overall, 70 per cent of the households persisted in one of the three livelihood strategies, and the remaining 30 per cent changed their strategy at least once. This dynamic is associated with the households’ duration in a particular livelihood strategy and the various characteristics of households and household heads. Understanding livelihood movement, livelihood persistence and the associated covariates and targeting the poor on this basis is crucial to combating rural poverty and dismantling poverty traps. To this end, the present study suggests (i) strengthening physical and financial asset endowments to address low-remunerative strategies, (ii) improving infrastructure connectivity, particularly in remote and inaccessible areas, (iii) insuring against shocks, iv) enhancing opportunities for generating remittances and enabling petty trade, and (v) supporting the establishment of business ventures.

AB - Research on household livelihood dynamics is central to rural poverty reduction. In this paper, we adopt a three-wave panel dataset to explore the persistence of and transitions in household livelihoods in three districts of Nepal using duration and dynamic probit models. The results demonstrate that the livelihood strategies of rural households are dynamic: approximately 16 per cent of the sample households transitioned up to high-remunerative livelihood strategies, 10 per cent of the households shifted down to either low- or medium-remunerative livelihood strategies, and 69 per cent remained trapped in low-remunerative livelihood strategies. The major upward transition occurred from medium-remunerative strategies to high-remunerative strategies (14 per cent). Overall, 70 per cent of the households persisted in one of the three livelihood strategies, and the remaining 30 per cent changed their strategy at least once. This dynamic is associated with the households’ duration in a particular livelihood strategy and the various characteristics of households and household heads. Understanding livelihood movement, livelihood persistence and the associated covariates and targeting the poor on this basis is crucial to combating rural poverty and dismantling poverty traps. To this end, the present study suggests (i) strengthening physical and financial asset endowments to address low-remunerative strategies, (ii) improving infrastructure connectivity, particularly in remote and inaccessible areas, (iii) insuring against shocks, iv) enhancing opportunities for generating remittances and enabling petty trade, and (v) supporting the establishment of business ventures.

U2 - 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.04.017

DO - 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.04.017

M3 - Journal article

VL - 65

SP - 294

EP - 307

JO - Land Use Policy

JF - Land Use Policy

SN - 0264-8377

ER -

ID: 176868489