Should the contribution of one additional lame cow depend on how many other cows on the farm are lame?
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
- Should the Contribution of One Additional Lame Cow Depend on How Many Other Cows on the Farm Are Lame?
Final published version, 1 MB, PDF document
Welfare Quality® proposes a system for aggregation according to which the total welfare score for a group of animals is a non-linear effect of the prevalence of welfare scores across the individuals within the group. Three assumptions serve to justify this: (1) experts do not follow a linear reasoning when they assess a welfare problem; (2) it serves to prevent compensation (severe welfare problems hidden by scoring well on other aspects of welfare); (3) experts agree on the weight of different welfare measures. We use two sources of data to examine these assumptions: animal welfare data from 44 Danish dairy farms with Danish Holstein Friesian cows, and data from a questionnaire study with a convenience sample of 307 experts in animal welfare, of which we received responses from over 50%. Our main results were: (1) the total group-level welfare score as assigned by experts is a non-linear function of the individual animal welfare states within the group; (2) the WQ system does not prevent what experts perceive as unacceptable compensation; (3) the level of agreement among experts appears to vary across measures. Our findings give rise to concerns about the proposed aggregation system offered by WQ.
|Number of pages||13|
|Publication status||Published - Dec 2017|
- Aggregation, Animal welfare, Expert perception, Lameness, Welfare assessment, Welfare quality®
Number of downloads are based on statistics from Google Scholar and www.ku.dk