Exploring everyday life dynamics in meat reduction - A cluster analysis of flexitarians in Denmark

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Exploring everyday life dynamics in meat reduction - A cluster analysis of flexitarians in Denmark. / Halkier, Bente; Lund, Thomas Bøker.

In: Appetite, Vol. 183, 106487, 2023.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Halkier, B & Lund, TB 2023, 'Exploring everyday life dynamics in meat reduction - A cluster analysis of flexitarians in Denmark', Appetite, vol. 183, 106487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2023.106487

APA

Halkier, B., & Lund, T. B. (2023). Exploring everyday life dynamics in meat reduction - A cluster analysis of flexitarians in Denmark. Appetite, 183, [106487]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2023.106487

Vancouver

Halkier B, Lund TB. Exploring everyday life dynamics in meat reduction - A cluster analysis of flexitarians in Denmark. Appetite. 2023;183. 106487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2023.106487

Author

Halkier, Bente ; Lund, Thomas Bøker. / Exploring everyday life dynamics in meat reduction - A cluster analysis of flexitarians in Denmark. In: Appetite. 2023 ; Vol. 183.

Bibtex

@article{a3907b6c8cd84f58b35ae5361dcc24aa,
title = "Exploring everyday life dynamics in meat reduction - A cluster analysis of flexitarians in Denmark",
abstract = "Exploring everyday life dynamics in meat reduction – a cluster analysis of flexitarians in Denmark. Flexitarians are attracting increasing attention in the research on meat reduction. But there has been limited focus on comprehensive understandings of a broader range of dynamics that can work as barriers and facilitators for meat reduction. In this article, we use social practice theory (SPT) as a comprehensive approach to barriers and facilitators in meat reduction in everyday life. We present an analysis of data from a representative Danish cross-sectional survey. We show, first, that Danish flexitarians can be divided into four distinct clusters (what we will refer to as classes) in accordance with combinations of everyday facilitators and barriers. Second, we show that the prevalence of these classes varies considerably depending on how long people have been flexitarians. We argue that the patterns in this variation indicate that over time people transition to other classes where barriers to plant-rich eating become less significant, and routinization emerges in different ways. Finally, third, we show that flexitarians do report eating less meat than consumers who label themselves as eating meat with no restrictions. But we also highlight that the difference is relatively modest. Indeed, meat intake is still quite common even in classes where routinization is highest. Throughout the paper, we discuss similarities and differences between the SPT framework and another recent framework, the COM-B model, that also provides a comprehensive approach to the understanding of behavioural change.",
keywords = "Cluster analysis, Everyday life, Facilitators and barriers, Flexitarians",
author = "Bente Halkier and Lund, {Thomas B{\o}ker}",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2023 Elsevier Ltd",
year = "2023",
doi = "10.1016/j.appet.2023.106487",
language = "English",
volume = "183",
journal = "Appetite",
issn = "0195-6663",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Exploring everyday life dynamics in meat reduction - A cluster analysis of flexitarians in Denmark

AU - Halkier, Bente

AU - Lund, Thomas Bøker

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2023 Elsevier Ltd

PY - 2023

Y1 - 2023

N2 - Exploring everyday life dynamics in meat reduction – a cluster analysis of flexitarians in Denmark. Flexitarians are attracting increasing attention in the research on meat reduction. But there has been limited focus on comprehensive understandings of a broader range of dynamics that can work as barriers and facilitators for meat reduction. In this article, we use social practice theory (SPT) as a comprehensive approach to barriers and facilitators in meat reduction in everyday life. We present an analysis of data from a representative Danish cross-sectional survey. We show, first, that Danish flexitarians can be divided into four distinct clusters (what we will refer to as classes) in accordance with combinations of everyday facilitators and barriers. Second, we show that the prevalence of these classes varies considerably depending on how long people have been flexitarians. We argue that the patterns in this variation indicate that over time people transition to other classes where barriers to plant-rich eating become less significant, and routinization emerges in different ways. Finally, third, we show that flexitarians do report eating less meat than consumers who label themselves as eating meat with no restrictions. But we also highlight that the difference is relatively modest. Indeed, meat intake is still quite common even in classes where routinization is highest. Throughout the paper, we discuss similarities and differences between the SPT framework and another recent framework, the COM-B model, that also provides a comprehensive approach to the understanding of behavioural change.

AB - Exploring everyday life dynamics in meat reduction – a cluster analysis of flexitarians in Denmark. Flexitarians are attracting increasing attention in the research on meat reduction. But there has been limited focus on comprehensive understandings of a broader range of dynamics that can work as barriers and facilitators for meat reduction. In this article, we use social practice theory (SPT) as a comprehensive approach to barriers and facilitators in meat reduction in everyday life. We present an analysis of data from a representative Danish cross-sectional survey. We show, first, that Danish flexitarians can be divided into four distinct clusters (what we will refer to as classes) in accordance with combinations of everyday facilitators and barriers. Second, we show that the prevalence of these classes varies considerably depending on how long people have been flexitarians. We argue that the patterns in this variation indicate that over time people transition to other classes where barriers to plant-rich eating become less significant, and routinization emerges in different ways. Finally, third, we show that flexitarians do report eating less meat than consumers who label themselves as eating meat with no restrictions. But we also highlight that the difference is relatively modest. Indeed, meat intake is still quite common even in classes where routinization is highest. Throughout the paper, we discuss similarities and differences between the SPT framework and another recent framework, the COM-B model, that also provides a comprehensive approach to the understanding of behavioural change.

KW - Cluster analysis

KW - Everyday life

KW - Facilitators and barriers

KW - Flexitarians

U2 - 10.1016/j.appet.2023.106487

DO - 10.1016/j.appet.2023.106487

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 36746276

AN - SCOPUS:85147736124

VL - 183

JO - Appetite

JF - Appetite

SN - 0195-6663

M1 - 106487

ER -

ID: 336133012