The fairness in algorithmic fairness

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Documents

With the increasing use of algorithms in high-stakes areas such as criminal justice and health has come a significant concern about the fairness of prediction-based decision procedures. In this article I argue that a prominent class of mathematically incompatible performance parity criteria can all be understood as applications of John Broome’s account of fairness as the proportional satisfaction of claims. On this interpretation these criteria do not disagree on what it means for an algorithm to be fair. Rather they express different understandings of what grounds a claim to a good being allocated by an algorithmic decision procedure. I then argue that an important implication of the Broomean interpretation is that it strengthens the case for outcome-based criteria. Finally, I consider how a version of the levelling-down objection to performance parity criteria arises within the Broomean account.
Original languageEnglish
JournalRes Publica
Number of pages17
ISSN1356-4765
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 21 Feb 2022

ID: 298120488