A framework for exploring trust and distrust in natural resource management

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Standard

A framework for exploring trust and distrust in natural resource management. / Emborg, Jens; Daniels, Steven E.; Walker, Gregg B.

In: Frontiers in Communications, Vol. 5, 13, 2020.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Harvard

Emborg, J, Daniels, SE & Walker, GB 2020, 'A framework for exploring trust and distrust in natural resource management', Frontiers in Communications, vol. 5, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2020.00013

APA

Emborg, J., Daniels, S. E., & Walker, G. B. (2020). A framework for exploring trust and distrust in natural resource management. Frontiers in Communications, 5, [13]. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2020.00013

Vancouver

Emborg J, Daniels SE, Walker GB. A framework for exploring trust and distrust in natural resource management. Frontiers in Communications. 2020;5. 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2020.00013

Author

Emborg, Jens ; Daniels, Steven E. ; Walker, Gregg B. / A framework for exploring trust and distrust in natural resource management. In: Frontiers in Communications. 2020 ; Vol. 5.

Bibtex

@article{ba34fc0145064f249c7cd99696e41745,
title = "A framework for exploring trust and distrust in natural resource management",
abstract = "How can one simultaneously hold multiple trust judgments—some positive, some negative—and what relevance does this have to natural resource management processes? The paper examines trust through a lens of multiple simultaneous trust judgments, with application to the literature on trust in natural resource management. The conceptual contributions are (1) a clear distinction between trust and distrust, (2) how multiple trust/distrust judgments can co-exist, and (3) how multiple trust judgments can be assigned to individual vs. social/institutional scales. A framework for trust/distrust evaluation emerges in the form of a Trust/Distrust Matrix. One dimension of the matrix is the scales to which trust judgments may be assigned and one is the trust/distrust-judgments one makes that can either be calculus-based or identification-based. A set of propositions relevant to natural resource management are derived from the matrix. The fundamental purpose of this article is to bridge theory and practice.",
author = "Jens Emborg and Daniels, {Steven E.} and Walker, {Gregg B.}",
year = "2020",
doi = "10.3389/fcomm.2020.00013",
language = "English",
volume = "5",
journal = "Frontiers in Communications",
issn = "1050-9046",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - A framework for exploring trust and distrust in natural resource management

AU - Emborg, Jens

AU - Daniels, Steven E.

AU - Walker, Gregg B.

PY - 2020

Y1 - 2020

N2 - How can one simultaneously hold multiple trust judgments—some positive, some negative—and what relevance does this have to natural resource management processes? The paper examines trust through a lens of multiple simultaneous trust judgments, with application to the literature on trust in natural resource management. The conceptual contributions are (1) a clear distinction between trust and distrust, (2) how multiple trust/distrust judgments can co-exist, and (3) how multiple trust judgments can be assigned to individual vs. social/institutional scales. A framework for trust/distrust evaluation emerges in the form of a Trust/Distrust Matrix. One dimension of the matrix is the scales to which trust judgments may be assigned and one is the trust/distrust-judgments one makes that can either be calculus-based or identification-based. A set of propositions relevant to natural resource management are derived from the matrix. The fundamental purpose of this article is to bridge theory and practice.

AB - How can one simultaneously hold multiple trust judgments—some positive, some negative—and what relevance does this have to natural resource management processes? The paper examines trust through a lens of multiple simultaneous trust judgments, with application to the literature on trust in natural resource management. The conceptual contributions are (1) a clear distinction between trust and distrust, (2) how multiple trust/distrust judgments can co-exist, and (3) how multiple trust judgments can be assigned to individual vs. social/institutional scales. A framework for trust/distrust evaluation emerges in the form of a Trust/Distrust Matrix. One dimension of the matrix is the scales to which trust judgments may be assigned and one is the trust/distrust-judgments one makes that can either be calculus-based or identification-based. A set of propositions relevant to natural resource management are derived from the matrix. The fundamental purpose of this article is to bridge theory and practice.

U2 - 10.3389/fcomm.2020.00013

DO - 10.3389/fcomm.2020.00013

M3 - Journal article

VL - 5

JO - Frontiers in Communications

JF - Frontiers in Communications

SN - 1050-9046

M1 - 13

ER -

ID: 242417020