I will donate later! A field experiment on cell phone donations to charity

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

I will donate later! A field experiment on cell phone donations to charity. / Fosgaard, Toke R.; Soetevent, Adriaan R.

In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Vol. 202, 2022, p. 549-565.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Fosgaard, TR & Soetevent, AR 2022, 'I will donate later! A field experiment on cell phone donations to charity', Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, vol. 202, pp. 549-565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2022.08.025

APA

Fosgaard, T. R., & Soetevent, A. R. (2022). I will donate later! A field experiment on cell phone donations to charity. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 202, 549-565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2022.08.025

Vancouver

Fosgaard TR, Soetevent AR. I will donate later! A field experiment on cell phone donations to charity. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization. 2022;202:549-565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2022.08.025

Author

Fosgaard, Toke R. ; Soetevent, Adriaan R. / I will donate later! A field experiment on cell phone donations to charity. In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization. 2022 ; Vol. 202. pp. 549-565.

Bibtex

@article{dff23a3f7675463888c2c37f70e209ed,
title = "I will donate later! A field experiment on cell phone donations to charity",
abstract = "Given the replacement of cash with cell phone payments, people who are asked to donate to charity can easily promise a donation but delay the transfer until a later date. This may be a way to get out of the ask-situation with a positive image while maintaining the flexibility not to donate. This study explores whether charities can make people keep their promises by making such promises more explicit and more formal.In a door-to-door fund-raising field experiment, we vary the strength of the promise that donors make. Besides a control group where people can promise to donate, we apply two treatment groups. In the first treatment, donors are asked to verbally pledge a precise amount. In a second treatment, this amount is in addition put on paper with the solicitor{\textquoteright}s signature added. Both treatments are aimed at making it morally more expensive not to keep promises. Our results show that: (1) the majority of people do not follow through on their promise to donate; (2) donors who pledge an explicit amount more often keep their promise. The more formal the commitment, the closer the amount donated is to the amount promised; (3) many participants refuse to pledge a donation amount when asked, and those who refuse donate significantly less.",
author = "Fosgaard, {Toke R.} and Soetevent, {Adriaan R.}",
year = "2022",
doi = "10.1016/j.jebo.2022.08.025",
language = "English",
volume = "202",
pages = "549--565",
journal = "Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization",
issn = "0167-2681",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - I will donate later! A field experiment on cell phone donations to charity

AU - Fosgaard, Toke R.

AU - Soetevent, Adriaan R.

PY - 2022

Y1 - 2022

N2 - Given the replacement of cash with cell phone payments, people who are asked to donate to charity can easily promise a donation but delay the transfer until a later date. This may be a way to get out of the ask-situation with a positive image while maintaining the flexibility not to donate. This study explores whether charities can make people keep their promises by making such promises more explicit and more formal.In a door-to-door fund-raising field experiment, we vary the strength of the promise that donors make. Besides a control group where people can promise to donate, we apply two treatment groups. In the first treatment, donors are asked to verbally pledge a precise amount. In a second treatment, this amount is in addition put on paper with the solicitor’s signature added. Both treatments are aimed at making it morally more expensive not to keep promises. Our results show that: (1) the majority of people do not follow through on their promise to donate; (2) donors who pledge an explicit amount more often keep their promise. The more formal the commitment, the closer the amount donated is to the amount promised; (3) many participants refuse to pledge a donation amount when asked, and those who refuse donate significantly less.

AB - Given the replacement of cash with cell phone payments, people who are asked to donate to charity can easily promise a donation but delay the transfer until a later date. This may be a way to get out of the ask-situation with a positive image while maintaining the flexibility not to donate. This study explores whether charities can make people keep their promises by making such promises more explicit and more formal.In a door-to-door fund-raising field experiment, we vary the strength of the promise that donors make. Besides a control group where people can promise to donate, we apply two treatment groups. In the first treatment, donors are asked to verbally pledge a precise amount. In a second treatment, this amount is in addition put on paper with the solicitor’s signature added. Both treatments are aimed at making it morally more expensive not to keep promises. Our results show that: (1) the majority of people do not follow through on their promise to donate; (2) donors who pledge an explicit amount more often keep their promise. The more formal the commitment, the closer the amount donated is to the amount promised; (3) many participants refuse to pledge a donation amount when asked, and those who refuse donate significantly less.

U2 - 10.1016/j.jebo.2022.08.025

DO - 10.1016/j.jebo.2022.08.025

M3 - Journal article

VL - 202

SP - 549

EP - 565

JO - Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization

JF - Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization

SN - 0167-2681

ER -

ID: 318199989