Socioeconomic effects of a bottom-up multifunctional land consolidation project

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Socioeconomic effects of a bottom-up multifunctional land consolidation project. / Callesen, Gustav Marquard; Lundhede, Thomas Hedemark; Olsen, Søren Bøye; Schou, Jesper Sølver.

In: Land Use Policy, Vol. 117, 106102, 2022.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Callesen, GM, Lundhede, TH, Olsen, SB & Schou, JS 2022, 'Socioeconomic effects of a bottom-up multifunctional land consolidation project', Land Use Policy, vol. 117, 106102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106102

APA

Callesen, G. M., Lundhede, T. H., Olsen, S. B., & Schou, J. S. (2022). Socioeconomic effects of a bottom-up multifunctional land consolidation project. Land Use Policy, 117, [106102]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106102

Vancouver

Callesen GM, Lundhede TH, Olsen SB, Schou JS. Socioeconomic effects of a bottom-up multifunctional land consolidation project. Land Use Policy. 2022;117. 106102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106102

Author

Callesen, Gustav Marquard ; Lundhede, Thomas Hedemark ; Olsen, Søren Bøye ; Schou, Jesper Sølver. / Socioeconomic effects of a bottom-up multifunctional land consolidation project. In: Land Use Policy. 2022 ; Vol. 117.

Bibtex

@article{2c6d4cdd2bfc4e968906d0ce3a068e31,
title = "Socioeconomic effects of a bottom-up multifunctional land consolidation project",
abstract = "Taking agricultural land out of production or shifting from crop production to permanent grassland have recently been proposed in Denmark as general measures for contributing to greenhouse gas (GHG) reductions. One of the particular features of such measures is the creation of co-benefits, as taking agricultural land out of intensive production may affect a range of ecosystem services and economic goods, such as reduced nutrient loads and emissions of GHGs, improved biodiversity, and improved recreational opportunities. In this paper, we present results from an ex ante socioeconomic Cost-Benefit Analysis (CBA) with the purpose of assessing whether the expected benefits of a bottom-up local development plan for multifunctional land use in the catchment of Lake Glenstrup in Denmark will outweigh the expected costs. After quantifying the wide range of impacts, we apply benefit transfer to value them within the CBA framework. Among the primary effects are reduced emission of GHGs, reduced leaching of nutrients, increased recreational options, and opportunity costs from agriculture. The results indicate that the initiatives could lead to a net social gain of 1.4 mil. €. We perform a sensitivity analysis which shows that the choice of the spatial extent of the recreational effects has a large impact on the results, which range from 0.4 to 5.2 mil. €. Also, the shadow price of reduced GHG emissions play a major role. Finally, a distribution analysis shows that especially farmers bear the majority of costs, whereas other stakeholders enjoy most of the benefits.",
author = "Callesen, {Gustav Marquard} and Lundhede, {Thomas Hedemark} and Olsen, {S{\o}ren B{\o}ye} and Schou, {Jesper S{\o}lver}",
year = "2022",
doi = "10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106102",
language = "English",
volume = "117",
journal = "Land Use Policy",
issn = "0264-8377",
publisher = "Pergamon Press",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Socioeconomic effects of a bottom-up multifunctional land consolidation project

AU - Callesen, Gustav Marquard

AU - Lundhede, Thomas Hedemark

AU - Olsen, Søren Bøye

AU - Schou, Jesper Sølver

PY - 2022

Y1 - 2022

N2 - Taking agricultural land out of production or shifting from crop production to permanent grassland have recently been proposed in Denmark as general measures for contributing to greenhouse gas (GHG) reductions. One of the particular features of such measures is the creation of co-benefits, as taking agricultural land out of intensive production may affect a range of ecosystem services and economic goods, such as reduced nutrient loads and emissions of GHGs, improved biodiversity, and improved recreational opportunities. In this paper, we present results from an ex ante socioeconomic Cost-Benefit Analysis (CBA) with the purpose of assessing whether the expected benefits of a bottom-up local development plan for multifunctional land use in the catchment of Lake Glenstrup in Denmark will outweigh the expected costs. After quantifying the wide range of impacts, we apply benefit transfer to value them within the CBA framework. Among the primary effects are reduced emission of GHGs, reduced leaching of nutrients, increased recreational options, and opportunity costs from agriculture. The results indicate that the initiatives could lead to a net social gain of 1.4 mil. €. We perform a sensitivity analysis which shows that the choice of the spatial extent of the recreational effects has a large impact on the results, which range from 0.4 to 5.2 mil. €. Also, the shadow price of reduced GHG emissions play a major role. Finally, a distribution analysis shows that especially farmers bear the majority of costs, whereas other stakeholders enjoy most of the benefits.

AB - Taking agricultural land out of production or shifting from crop production to permanent grassland have recently been proposed in Denmark as general measures for contributing to greenhouse gas (GHG) reductions. One of the particular features of such measures is the creation of co-benefits, as taking agricultural land out of intensive production may affect a range of ecosystem services and economic goods, such as reduced nutrient loads and emissions of GHGs, improved biodiversity, and improved recreational opportunities. In this paper, we present results from an ex ante socioeconomic Cost-Benefit Analysis (CBA) with the purpose of assessing whether the expected benefits of a bottom-up local development plan for multifunctional land use in the catchment of Lake Glenstrup in Denmark will outweigh the expected costs. After quantifying the wide range of impacts, we apply benefit transfer to value them within the CBA framework. Among the primary effects are reduced emission of GHGs, reduced leaching of nutrients, increased recreational options, and opportunity costs from agriculture. The results indicate that the initiatives could lead to a net social gain of 1.4 mil. €. We perform a sensitivity analysis which shows that the choice of the spatial extent of the recreational effects has a large impact on the results, which range from 0.4 to 5.2 mil. €. Also, the shadow price of reduced GHG emissions play a major role. Finally, a distribution analysis shows that especially farmers bear the majority of costs, whereas other stakeholders enjoy most of the benefits.

U2 - 10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106102

DO - 10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106102

M3 - Journal article

VL - 117

JO - Land Use Policy

JF - Land Use Policy

SN - 0264-8377

M1 - 106102

ER -

ID: 301142021