Support for transnational conservation in a gain-loss context

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Support for transnational conservation in a gain-loss context. / Vogdrup-Schmidt, Mathias; Strange, Niels; Thorsen, Bo Jellesmark.

In: Ecological Economics, Vol. 162, 2019, p. 49-58.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Vogdrup-Schmidt, M, Strange, N & Thorsen, BJ 2019, 'Support for transnational conservation in a gain-loss context', Ecological Economics, vol. 162, pp. 49-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.04.026

APA

Vogdrup-Schmidt, M., Strange, N., & Thorsen, B. J. (2019). Support for transnational conservation in a gain-loss context. Ecological Economics, 162, 49-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.04.026

Vancouver

Vogdrup-Schmidt M, Strange N, Thorsen BJ. Support for transnational conservation in a gain-loss context. Ecological Economics. 2019;162:49-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.04.026

Author

Vogdrup-Schmidt, Mathias ; Strange, Niels ; Thorsen, Bo Jellesmark. / Support for transnational conservation in a gain-loss context. In: Ecological Economics. 2019 ; Vol. 162. pp. 49-58.

Bibtex

@article{67d66692659c4120a0655a56a2990200,
title = "Support for transnational conservation in a gain-loss context",
abstract = "Efficient biodiversity conservation may rest on support for transnational cooperation; particularly for migratory species. Support for transnational conservation efforts may hinge on key issues like the potential outcomes and whether any collaboration aspect is highlighted. We designed an experiment focused on conservation of open land habitats in Denmark and the Netherlands. We tested how support of Danish households depends on framing in a context of possible losses of habitats and on possible contributions from Dutch households to the conservation case. We further tested for presence of loss aversion in outcomes and income. We found that the willingness-to-pay (WTP) for gains in open land habitats at home tended to increase when habitat losses were possible. Framing in the context of others, Dutch households, contributing consistently affected Danes' WTP for increasing protected habitat areas and for avoiding habitat losses. And the less Dutch households contributed, the more Danish households contributed with the converse also being true. Our results suggest that overall support for habitat conservation for migratory birds may be higher in cases where a risk of habitat losses exists. Results also suggest that support for conservation at home increase when respondents perceive that they share the challenge with other countries.",
keywords = "Choice experiment, Cross-country collaboration, Framing effects, Loss aversion, Migratory species",
author = "Mathias Vogdrup-Schmidt and Niels Strange and Thorsen, {Bo Jellesmark}",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.04.026",
language = "English",
volume = "162",
pages = "49--58",
journal = "Ecological Economics",
issn = "0921-8009",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Support for transnational conservation in a gain-loss context

AU - Vogdrup-Schmidt, Mathias

AU - Strange, Niels

AU - Thorsen, Bo Jellesmark

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - Efficient biodiversity conservation may rest on support for transnational cooperation; particularly for migratory species. Support for transnational conservation efforts may hinge on key issues like the potential outcomes and whether any collaboration aspect is highlighted. We designed an experiment focused on conservation of open land habitats in Denmark and the Netherlands. We tested how support of Danish households depends on framing in a context of possible losses of habitats and on possible contributions from Dutch households to the conservation case. We further tested for presence of loss aversion in outcomes and income. We found that the willingness-to-pay (WTP) for gains in open land habitats at home tended to increase when habitat losses were possible. Framing in the context of others, Dutch households, contributing consistently affected Danes' WTP for increasing protected habitat areas and for avoiding habitat losses. And the less Dutch households contributed, the more Danish households contributed with the converse also being true. Our results suggest that overall support for habitat conservation for migratory birds may be higher in cases where a risk of habitat losses exists. Results also suggest that support for conservation at home increase when respondents perceive that they share the challenge with other countries.

AB - Efficient biodiversity conservation may rest on support for transnational cooperation; particularly for migratory species. Support for transnational conservation efforts may hinge on key issues like the potential outcomes and whether any collaboration aspect is highlighted. We designed an experiment focused on conservation of open land habitats in Denmark and the Netherlands. We tested how support of Danish households depends on framing in a context of possible losses of habitats and on possible contributions from Dutch households to the conservation case. We further tested for presence of loss aversion in outcomes and income. We found that the willingness-to-pay (WTP) for gains in open land habitats at home tended to increase when habitat losses were possible. Framing in the context of others, Dutch households, contributing consistently affected Danes' WTP for increasing protected habitat areas and for avoiding habitat losses. And the less Dutch households contributed, the more Danish households contributed with the converse also being true. Our results suggest that overall support for habitat conservation for migratory birds may be higher in cases where a risk of habitat losses exists. Results also suggest that support for conservation at home increase when respondents perceive that they share the challenge with other countries.

KW - Choice experiment

KW - Cross-country collaboration

KW - Framing effects

KW - Loss aversion

KW - Migratory species

U2 - 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.04.026

DO - 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.04.026

M3 - Journal article

AN - SCOPUS:85064928322

VL - 162

SP - 49

EP - 58

JO - Ecological Economics

JF - Ecological Economics

SN - 0921-8009

ER -

ID: 218089524