The heterogeneous processes of cheating: Attention evidence from two eye tracking experiments

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

The heterogeneous processes of cheating : Attention evidence from two eye tracking experiments. / Fosgaard, Toke; Jacobsen, Catrine; Street, Chris.

In: Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 10.07.2020.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Fosgaard, T, Jacobsen, C & Street, C 2020, 'The heterogeneous processes of cheating: Attention evidence from two eye tracking experiments', Journal of Behavioral Decision Making. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.2200

APA

Fosgaard, T., Jacobsen, C., & Street, C. (2020). The heterogeneous processes of cheating: Attention evidence from two eye tracking experiments. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.2200

Vancouver

Fosgaard T, Jacobsen C, Street C. The heterogeneous processes of cheating: Attention evidence from two eye tracking experiments. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making. 2020 Jul 10. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.2200

Author

Fosgaard, Toke ; Jacobsen, Catrine ; Street, Chris. / The heterogeneous processes of cheating : Attention evidence from two eye tracking experiments. In: Journal of Behavioral Decision Making. 2020.

Bibtex

@article{6dded62030c04d61addd2b3b4f856c61,
title = "The heterogeneous processes of cheating: Attention evidence from two eye tracking experiments",
abstract = "Dishonesty erodes society. Although much is known about dishonesty, the process leading up to the decision of whether to be honest or dishonest is often assumed to be homogenous and is not well understood. In this paper, we take a more nuanced approach and explore more closely the process of deciding whether to cheat or be honest when an opportunity to cheat arises. We do this in two laboratory eye tracking experiments. In our first experiment (n = 193), we identify heterogeneity in the decision to cheat. Some decisions on whether to cheat or be honest exhibit relatively little variation and appear to be oriented towards cheating (or honesty) with apparently little consideration of the alternative, whereas other decisions seem to be characterized by a higher degree of consideration for both decision alternatives. Our second experiment (n = 299) demonstrates that a gaze dependent intervention in the choices process is able to affect the behavioral outcomes.",
keywords = "dishonesty, drift-diffusion model, eye tracking, heterogeneity",
author = "Toke Fosgaard and Catrine Jacobsen and Chris Street",
year = "2020",
month = "7",
day = "10",
doi = "10.1002/bdm.2200",
language = "English",
journal = "Journal of Behavioral Decision Making",
issn = "0894-3257",
publisher = "Wiley",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The heterogeneous processes of cheating

T2 - Attention evidence from two eye tracking experiments

AU - Fosgaard, Toke

AU - Jacobsen, Catrine

AU - Street, Chris

PY - 2020/7/10

Y1 - 2020/7/10

N2 - Dishonesty erodes society. Although much is known about dishonesty, the process leading up to the decision of whether to be honest or dishonest is often assumed to be homogenous and is not well understood. In this paper, we take a more nuanced approach and explore more closely the process of deciding whether to cheat or be honest when an opportunity to cheat arises. We do this in two laboratory eye tracking experiments. In our first experiment (n = 193), we identify heterogeneity in the decision to cheat. Some decisions on whether to cheat or be honest exhibit relatively little variation and appear to be oriented towards cheating (or honesty) with apparently little consideration of the alternative, whereas other decisions seem to be characterized by a higher degree of consideration for both decision alternatives. Our second experiment (n = 299) demonstrates that a gaze dependent intervention in the choices process is able to affect the behavioral outcomes.

AB - Dishonesty erodes society. Although much is known about dishonesty, the process leading up to the decision of whether to be honest or dishonest is often assumed to be homogenous and is not well understood. In this paper, we take a more nuanced approach and explore more closely the process of deciding whether to cheat or be honest when an opportunity to cheat arises. We do this in two laboratory eye tracking experiments. In our first experiment (n = 193), we identify heterogeneity in the decision to cheat. Some decisions on whether to cheat or be honest exhibit relatively little variation and appear to be oriented towards cheating (or honesty) with apparently little consideration of the alternative, whereas other decisions seem to be characterized by a higher degree of consideration for both decision alternatives. Our second experiment (n = 299) demonstrates that a gaze dependent intervention in the choices process is able to affect the behavioral outcomes.

KW - dishonesty

KW - drift-diffusion model

KW - eye tracking

KW - heterogeneity

U2 - 10.1002/bdm.2200

DO - 10.1002/bdm.2200

M3 - Journal article

AN - SCOPUS:85087675032

JO - Journal of Behavioral Decision Making

JF - Journal of Behavioral Decision Making

SN - 0894-3257

ER -

ID: 244956971