Tradeable nitrogen abatement practices for diffuse agricultural emissions: A ‘Smart Market’ approach

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Tradeable nitrogen abatement practices for diffuse agricultural emissions : A ‘Smart Market’ approach. / Hasan, Syezlin; Hansen, Line Block; Smart, James C.R.; Hasler, Berit; Termansen, Mette.

In: Environmental and Resource Economics, Vol. 82, 2022, p. 29–63.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Hasan, S, Hansen, LB, Smart, JCR, Hasler, B & Termansen, M 2022, 'Tradeable nitrogen abatement practices for diffuse agricultural emissions: A ‘Smart Market’ approach', Environmental and Resource Economics, vol. 82, pp. 29–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-022-00657-2

APA

Hasan, S., Hansen, L. B., Smart, J. C. R., Hasler, B., & Termansen, M. (2022). Tradeable nitrogen abatement practices for diffuse agricultural emissions: A ‘Smart Market’ approach. Environmental and Resource Economics, 82, 29–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-022-00657-2

Vancouver

Hasan S, Hansen LB, Smart JCR, Hasler B, Termansen M. Tradeable nitrogen abatement practices for diffuse agricultural emissions: A ‘Smart Market’ approach. Environmental and Resource Economics. 2022;82:29–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-022-00657-2

Author

Hasan, Syezlin ; Hansen, Line Block ; Smart, James C.R. ; Hasler, Berit ; Termansen, Mette. / Tradeable nitrogen abatement practices for diffuse agricultural emissions : A ‘Smart Market’ approach. In: Environmental and Resource Economics. 2022 ; Vol. 82. pp. 29–63.

Bibtex

@article{3f1c892aa4f84da98cce90a66c67eabf,
title = "Tradeable nitrogen abatement practices for diffuse agricultural emissions: A {\textquoteleft}Smart Market{\textquoteright} approach",
abstract = "Markets in pollution permits for managing environmental quality have been advocated by economists since early 1970s as a mechanism that can deliver pollution reduction targets at lower cost to regulated entities than traditional uniform command-and control approaches. This study explores whether a {\textquoteleft}smart market{\textquoteright} cap-and-trade scheme between non-point sources can offer meaningful, robust and policy amenable, advantages over alternative approaches for nitrogen management in a realistic setting: 6504 individual farms in Limfjorden catchment, Denmark. The scheme involves multilateral trading of nitrogen emission rights among farms via changes in agricultural land management practices under a catchment-level cap on total nitrogen load. In this, the first exploration of non-point to non-point smart market nitrogen trading in a real setting, we estimate efficiency gains compared to uniform command-and-control regulation, explore the robustness of these gains in the face of non-participation, and reflect on farmers{\textquoteright} potential acceptance of the trading market in comparison with its command-and-control analog: spatially-targeted regulation, implemented via location-specific limits on nitrogen leaching. Results indicate that the smart market has the potential to substantially reduce the cost of meeting the catchment{\textquoteright}s nitrogen reduction target. For a 21.5% reduction from baseline nitrogen load, the market delivers cost savings of 56% (DKK273 million, €36.6 million) compared to uniform regulation, with participating farms realising a mean net benefit of DKK 723/ha (€ 97/ha). Market performance is relatively robust against transaction cost; when delivering a 21.5% reduction in nitrogen load to Limfjorden, approximately 70% of the overall efficiency gain could be retained if only 24% of farms engaged with the market.",
keywords = "Diffuse pollution, Land use, Leaching, Linear programming, Simulations, Water Framework Directive, Water quality trading",
author = "Syezlin Hasan and Hansen, {Line Block} and Smart, {James C.R.} and Berit Hasler and Mette Termansen",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2022, The Author(s).",
year = "2022",
doi = "10.1007/s10640-022-00657-2",
language = "English",
volume = "82",
pages = "29–63",
journal = "Environmental and Resource Economics",
issn = "0924-6460",
publisher = "Springer",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Tradeable nitrogen abatement practices for diffuse agricultural emissions

T2 - A ‘Smart Market’ approach

AU - Hasan, Syezlin

AU - Hansen, Line Block

AU - Smart, James C.R.

AU - Hasler, Berit

AU - Termansen, Mette

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2022, The Author(s).

PY - 2022

Y1 - 2022

N2 - Markets in pollution permits for managing environmental quality have been advocated by economists since early 1970s as a mechanism that can deliver pollution reduction targets at lower cost to regulated entities than traditional uniform command-and control approaches. This study explores whether a ‘smart market’ cap-and-trade scheme between non-point sources can offer meaningful, robust and policy amenable, advantages over alternative approaches for nitrogen management in a realistic setting: 6504 individual farms in Limfjorden catchment, Denmark. The scheme involves multilateral trading of nitrogen emission rights among farms via changes in agricultural land management practices under a catchment-level cap on total nitrogen load. In this, the first exploration of non-point to non-point smart market nitrogen trading in a real setting, we estimate efficiency gains compared to uniform command-and-control regulation, explore the robustness of these gains in the face of non-participation, and reflect on farmers’ potential acceptance of the trading market in comparison with its command-and-control analog: spatially-targeted regulation, implemented via location-specific limits on nitrogen leaching. Results indicate that the smart market has the potential to substantially reduce the cost of meeting the catchment’s nitrogen reduction target. For a 21.5% reduction from baseline nitrogen load, the market delivers cost savings of 56% (DKK273 million, €36.6 million) compared to uniform regulation, with participating farms realising a mean net benefit of DKK 723/ha (€ 97/ha). Market performance is relatively robust against transaction cost; when delivering a 21.5% reduction in nitrogen load to Limfjorden, approximately 70% of the overall efficiency gain could be retained if only 24% of farms engaged with the market.

AB - Markets in pollution permits for managing environmental quality have been advocated by economists since early 1970s as a mechanism that can deliver pollution reduction targets at lower cost to regulated entities than traditional uniform command-and control approaches. This study explores whether a ‘smart market’ cap-and-trade scheme between non-point sources can offer meaningful, robust and policy amenable, advantages over alternative approaches for nitrogen management in a realistic setting: 6504 individual farms in Limfjorden catchment, Denmark. The scheme involves multilateral trading of nitrogen emission rights among farms via changes in agricultural land management practices under a catchment-level cap on total nitrogen load. In this, the first exploration of non-point to non-point smart market nitrogen trading in a real setting, we estimate efficiency gains compared to uniform command-and-control regulation, explore the robustness of these gains in the face of non-participation, and reflect on farmers’ potential acceptance of the trading market in comparison with its command-and-control analog: spatially-targeted regulation, implemented via location-specific limits on nitrogen leaching. Results indicate that the smart market has the potential to substantially reduce the cost of meeting the catchment’s nitrogen reduction target. For a 21.5% reduction from baseline nitrogen load, the market delivers cost savings of 56% (DKK273 million, €36.6 million) compared to uniform regulation, with participating farms realising a mean net benefit of DKK 723/ha (€ 97/ha). Market performance is relatively robust against transaction cost; when delivering a 21.5% reduction in nitrogen load to Limfjorden, approximately 70% of the overall efficiency gain could be retained if only 24% of farms engaged with the market.

KW - Diffuse pollution

KW - Land use

KW - Leaching

KW - Linear programming

KW - Simulations

KW - Water Framework Directive

KW - Water quality trading

U2 - 10.1007/s10640-022-00657-2

DO - 10.1007/s10640-022-00657-2

M3 - Journal article

AN - SCOPUS:85126538262

VL - 82

SP - 29

EP - 63

JO - Environmental and Resource Economics

JF - Environmental and Resource Economics

SN - 0924-6460

ER -

ID: 301140961