Revisiting a theory of access: A review

Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

Standard

Revisiting a theory of access : A review. / Myers, Rodd; Hansen, Christian Pilegaard.

In: Society & Natural Resources, Vol. 33, No. 2, 2020, p. 146-166.

Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Myers, R & Hansen, CP 2020, 'Revisiting a theory of access: A review', Society & Natural Resources, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 146-166. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2018.1560522

APA

Myers, R., & Hansen, C. P. (2020). Revisiting a theory of access: A review. Society & Natural Resources, 33(2), 146-166. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2018.1560522

Vancouver

Myers R, Hansen CP. Revisiting a theory of access: A review. Society & Natural Resources. 2020;33(2):146-166. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2018.1560522

Author

Myers, Rodd ; Hansen, Christian Pilegaard. / Revisiting a theory of access : A review. In: Society & Natural Resources. 2020 ; Vol. 33, No. 2. pp. 146-166.

Bibtex

@article{ab175f268c9b42ce8480f618368f365b,
title = "Revisiting a theory of access: A review",
abstract = "A Theory of Access (Ribot and Peluso 2003) was published 15 years ago. With almost 1600 publications citing it, the paper is instrumental in expanding scholarly thinking beyond property by exploring notions of power. We reviewed all available literature that cited A Theory of Access to understand its influence on academic literature. We first analyse literature in relation to other frameworks with similar concerns: (1) entitlements framework, (2) sustainable livelihoods approach, (3) powers of exclusion; and subsequently move to a review of how it has been engaged in broader theoretical and conceptual debates in the social sciences: (4) gender, (5) materiality, (6) property and authority, and (7) power. The analysis shows most of the literature interacts with A Theory of Access superficially. Substantial attempts to address A Theory of Access were varied and often used it to develop other social theory rather than to modify A Theory of Access.",
author = "Rodd Myers and Hansen, {Christian Pilegaard}",
year = "2020",
doi = "10.1080/08941920.2018.1560522",
language = "English",
volume = "33",
pages = "146--166",
journal = "Society and Natural Resources",
issn = "0894-1920",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Revisiting a theory of access

T2 - A review

AU - Myers, Rodd

AU - Hansen, Christian Pilegaard

PY - 2020

Y1 - 2020

N2 - A Theory of Access (Ribot and Peluso 2003) was published 15 years ago. With almost 1600 publications citing it, the paper is instrumental in expanding scholarly thinking beyond property by exploring notions of power. We reviewed all available literature that cited A Theory of Access to understand its influence on academic literature. We first analyse literature in relation to other frameworks with similar concerns: (1) entitlements framework, (2) sustainable livelihoods approach, (3) powers of exclusion; and subsequently move to a review of how it has been engaged in broader theoretical and conceptual debates in the social sciences: (4) gender, (5) materiality, (6) property and authority, and (7) power. The analysis shows most of the literature interacts with A Theory of Access superficially. Substantial attempts to address A Theory of Access were varied and often used it to develop other social theory rather than to modify A Theory of Access.

AB - A Theory of Access (Ribot and Peluso 2003) was published 15 years ago. With almost 1600 publications citing it, the paper is instrumental in expanding scholarly thinking beyond property by exploring notions of power. We reviewed all available literature that cited A Theory of Access to understand its influence on academic literature. We first analyse literature in relation to other frameworks with similar concerns: (1) entitlements framework, (2) sustainable livelihoods approach, (3) powers of exclusion; and subsequently move to a review of how it has been engaged in broader theoretical and conceptual debates in the social sciences: (4) gender, (5) materiality, (6) property and authority, and (7) power. The analysis shows most of the literature interacts with A Theory of Access superficially. Substantial attempts to address A Theory of Access were varied and often used it to develop other social theory rather than to modify A Theory of Access.

U2 - 10.1080/08941920.2018.1560522

DO - 10.1080/08941920.2018.1560522

M3 - Review

VL - 33

SP - 146

EP - 166

JO - Society and Natural Resources

JF - Society and Natural Resources

SN - 0894-1920

IS - 2

ER -

ID: 214509475