Why residual emissions matter right now

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Why residual emissions matter right now. / Buck, Holly Jean; Carton, Wim; Lund, Jens Friis; Markusson, Nils.

In: Nature Climate Change, Vol. 13, No. 4, 2023, p. 351-358.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Buck, HJ, Carton, W, Lund, JF & Markusson, N 2023, 'Why residual emissions matter right now', Nature Climate Change, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 351-358. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-022-01592-2

APA

Buck, H. J., Carton, W., Lund, J. F., & Markusson, N. (2023). Why residual emissions matter right now. Nature Climate Change, 13(4), 351-358. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-022-01592-2

Vancouver

Buck HJ, Carton W, Lund JF, Markusson N. Why residual emissions matter right now. Nature Climate Change. 2023;13(4):351-358. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-022-01592-2

Author

Buck, Holly Jean ; Carton, Wim ; Lund, Jens Friis ; Markusson, Nils. / Why residual emissions matter right now. In: Nature Climate Change. 2023 ; Vol. 13, No. 4. pp. 351-358.

Bibtex

@article{03ee907b4b624db2a7c476b5ea5ed3ad,
title = "Why residual emissions matter right now",
abstract = "Net-zero targets imply that continuing residual emissions will be balanced by carbon dioxide removal. However, residual emissions are typically not well defined, conceptually or quantitatively. We analysed governments{\textquoteright} long-term strategies submitted to the UNFCCC to explore projections of residual emissions, including amounts and sectors. We found substantial levels of residual emissions at net-zero greenhouse gas emissions, on average 18% of current emissions for Annex I countries. The majority of strategies were imprecise about which sectors residual emissions would originate from, and few offered specific projections of how residual emissions could be balanced by carbon removal. Our findings indicate the need for a consistent definition of residual emissions, as well as processes that standardize and compare expectations about residual emissions across countries. This is necessary for two reasons: to avoid projections of excessive residuals and correspondent unsustainable or unfeasible carbon-removal levels and to send clearer signals about the temporality of fossil fuel use.",
author = "Buck, {Holly Jean} and Wim Carton and Lund, {Jens Friis} and Nils Markusson",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2023, The Author(s).",
year = "2023",
doi = "10.1038/s41558-022-01592-2",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
pages = "351--358",
journal = "Nature Climate Change",
issn = "1758-678X",
publisher = "nature publishing group",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Why residual emissions matter right now

AU - Buck, Holly Jean

AU - Carton, Wim

AU - Lund, Jens Friis

AU - Markusson, Nils

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2023, The Author(s).

PY - 2023

Y1 - 2023

N2 - Net-zero targets imply that continuing residual emissions will be balanced by carbon dioxide removal. However, residual emissions are typically not well defined, conceptually or quantitatively. We analysed governments’ long-term strategies submitted to the UNFCCC to explore projections of residual emissions, including amounts and sectors. We found substantial levels of residual emissions at net-zero greenhouse gas emissions, on average 18% of current emissions for Annex I countries. The majority of strategies were imprecise about which sectors residual emissions would originate from, and few offered specific projections of how residual emissions could be balanced by carbon removal. Our findings indicate the need for a consistent definition of residual emissions, as well as processes that standardize and compare expectations about residual emissions across countries. This is necessary for two reasons: to avoid projections of excessive residuals and correspondent unsustainable or unfeasible carbon-removal levels and to send clearer signals about the temporality of fossil fuel use.

AB - Net-zero targets imply that continuing residual emissions will be balanced by carbon dioxide removal. However, residual emissions are typically not well defined, conceptually or quantitatively. We analysed governments’ long-term strategies submitted to the UNFCCC to explore projections of residual emissions, including amounts and sectors. We found substantial levels of residual emissions at net-zero greenhouse gas emissions, on average 18% of current emissions for Annex I countries. The majority of strategies were imprecise about which sectors residual emissions would originate from, and few offered specific projections of how residual emissions could be balanced by carbon removal. Our findings indicate the need for a consistent definition of residual emissions, as well as processes that standardize and compare expectations about residual emissions across countries. This is necessary for two reasons: to avoid projections of excessive residuals and correspondent unsustainable or unfeasible carbon-removal levels and to send clearer signals about the temporality of fossil fuel use.

U2 - 10.1038/s41558-022-01592-2

DO - 10.1038/s41558-022-01592-2

M3 - Journal article

AN - SCOPUS:85149472732

VL - 13

SP - 351

EP - 358

JO - Nature Climate Change

JF - Nature Climate Change

SN - 1758-678X

IS - 4

ER -

ID: 343356807