Identifying institutional configurations for policy outcomes: A comparison of ecosystem services delivery

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Standard

Identifying institutional configurations for policy outcomes : A comparison of ecosystem services delivery. / Bazzan, Giulia; Candel, Jeroen; Daugbjerg, Carsten; Pecurul, Mireia.

In: Policy Studies Journal, Vol. 51, No. 3, 2023, p. 501-527.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Harvard

Bazzan, G, Candel, J, Daugbjerg, C & Pecurul, M 2023, 'Identifying institutional configurations for policy outcomes: A comparison of ecosystem services delivery', Policy Studies Journal, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 501-527. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12476

APA

Bazzan, G., Candel, J., Daugbjerg, C., & Pecurul, M. (2023). Identifying institutional configurations for policy outcomes: A comparison of ecosystem services delivery. Policy Studies Journal, 51(3), 501-527. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12476

Vancouver

Bazzan G, Candel J, Daugbjerg C, Pecurul M. Identifying institutional configurations for policy outcomes: A comparison of ecosystem services delivery. Policy Studies Journal. 2023;51(3):501-527. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12476

Author

Bazzan, Giulia ; Candel, Jeroen ; Daugbjerg, Carsten ; Pecurul, Mireia. / Identifying institutional configurations for policy outcomes : A comparison of ecosystem services delivery. In: Policy Studies Journal. 2023 ; Vol. 51, No. 3. pp. 501-527.

Bibtex

@article{39c52c28cac644348f36cd47fa3a5200,
title = "Identifying institutional configurations for policy outcomes: A comparison of ecosystem services delivery",
abstract = "This paper employs the Institutional Analysis and Development framework across six ecosystem delivery measures in the European Union to develop a configurational explanation of (un)successful outcomes. By undertaking comparative institutional analysis, we systematically examine the effect of variation across rule types and generate insights on how different institutional configurations result in varying degrees of successful implementation of ecosystem delivery measures. We apply explanatory typology methods to identify the institutional features that best explain variation in implementation success across a number of cases. We argue that institutional rules shape outcomes in conjunction rather than in isolation. The findings show that differences in implementation success across cases can be explained by the interplay of differences in knowledge exchange, flexibility in implementation, and participation in the policy design process.",
keywords = "comparative methods, configurational explanation, ecosystem delivery measures, implementation success, institutional analysis",
author = "Giulia Bazzan and Jeroen Candel and Carsten Daugbjerg and Mireia Pecurul",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2022 The Authors. Policy Studies Journal published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Policy Studies Organization.",
year = "2023",
doi = "10.1111/psj.12476",
language = "English",
volume = "51",
pages = "501--527",
journal = "Policy Studies Journal",
issn = "0190-292X",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Identifying institutional configurations for policy outcomes

T2 - A comparison of ecosystem services delivery

AU - Bazzan, Giulia

AU - Candel, Jeroen

AU - Daugbjerg, Carsten

AU - Pecurul, Mireia

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2022 The Authors. Policy Studies Journal published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Policy Studies Organization.

PY - 2023

Y1 - 2023

N2 - This paper employs the Institutional Analysis and Development framework across six ecosystem delivery measures in the European Union to develop a configurational explanation of (un)successful outcomes. By undertaking comparative institutional analysis, we systematically examine the effect of variation across rule types and generate insights on how different institutional configurations result in varying degrees of successful implementation of ecosystem delivery measures. We apply explanatory typology methods to identify the institutional features that best explain variation in implementation success across a number of cases. We argue that institutional rules shape outcomes in conjunction rather than in isolation. The findings show that differences in implementation success across cases can be explained by the interplay of differences in knowledge exchange, flexibility in implementation, and participation in the policy design process.

AB - This paper employs the Institutional Analysis and Development framework across six ecosystem delivery measures in the European Union to develop a configurational explanation of (un)successful outcomes. By undertaking comparative institutional analysis, we systematically examine the effect of variation across rule types and generate insights on how different institutional configurations result in varying degrees of successful implementation of ecosystem delivery measures. We apply explanatory typology methods to identify the institutional features that best explain variation in implementation success across a number of cases. We argue that institutional rules shape outcomes in conjunction rather than in isolation. The findings show that differences in implementation success across cases can be explained by the interplay of differences in knowledge exchange, flexibility in implementation, and participation in the policy design process.

KW - comparative methods

KW - configurational explanation

KW - ecosystem delivery measures

KW - implementation success

KW - institutional analysis

U2 - 10.1111/psj.12476

DO - 10.1111/psj.12476

M3 - Journal article

AN - SCOPUS:85136522904

VL - 51

SP - 501

EP - 527

JO - Policy Studies Journal

JF - Policy Studies Journal

SN - 0190-292X

IS - 3

ER -

ID: 318431088