The troubled path to food sovereignty in Nepal: ambiguities in agricultural policy reform

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

The food sovereignty movement arose as a challenge to neoliberal models of agriculture and food and the corporatization of agriculture, which is claimed to have undermined peasant agriculture and sustainability. However, food sovereignty is an ambiguous idea. Yet, a few countries are institutionalizing it. In this paper, we argue that food sovereignty possesses the attributes of a ‘coalition magnet’ and, thus, brings together policy actors that support agricultural reform, but have diverse and often opposing interests, in a loose coalition. This facilitates agenda setting, but there may be problems in policy formulation and implementation stages due to the ambiguous nature of the idea. Consequently, despite including food sovereignty in a country’s constitution and/or legislation, policies and programs related to food and agriculture exhibit the status quo, which is not expected under an alternative food paradigm. We examine this argument in a case study of Nepal, where food sovereignty has been instituted as a fundamental right in the Constitution.

Original languageEnglish
JournalAgriculture and Human Values
ISSN0889-048X
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 5 Oct 2019

    Research areas

  • Actors, Coalition magnet, Food sovereignty, Ideas, Nepal

ID: 234024562