Scenario realism and welfare estimates in choice experiments - a non-market valuation study on the European water framework directive

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt

Standard

Scenario realism and welfare estimates in choice experiments - a non-market valuation study on the European water framework directive. / Kataria, Mitesh; Bateman, I.; Christensen, Tove; Dubgaard, Alex; Hasler, Berit; Hime, S.; Ladenburg, J.; Levin, Gregor; Martinsen, Louise; Nissen, Carsten Junker Vogler.

I: Journal of Environmental Management, Bind 94, Nr. 1, 2012, s. 25-33.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt

Harvard

Kataria, M, Bateman, I, Christensen, T, Dubgaard, A, Hasler, B, Hime, S, Ladenburg, J, Levin, G, Martinsen, L & Nissen, CJV 2012, 'Scenario realism and welfare estimates in choice experiments - a non-market valuation study on the European water framework directive', Journal of Environmental Management, bind 94, nr. 1, s. 25-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.08.010

APA

Kataria, M., Bateman, I., Christensen, T., Dubgaard, A., Hasler, B., Hime, S., Ladenburg, J., Levin, G., Martinsen, L., & Nissen, C. J. V. (2012). Scenario realism and welfare estimates in choice experiments - a non-market valuation study on the European water framework directive. Journal of Environmental Management, 94(1), 25-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.08.010

Vancouver

Kataria M, Bateman I, Christensen T, Dubgaard A, Hasler B, Hime S o.a. Scenario realism and welfare estimates in choice experiments - a non-market valuation study on the European water framework directive. Journal of Environmental Management. 2012;94(1):25-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.08.010

Author

Kataria, Mitesh ; Bateman, I. ; Christensen, Tove ; Dubgaard, Alex ; Hasler, Berit ; Hime, S. ; Ladenburg, J. ; Levin, Gregor ; Martinsen, Louise ; Nissen, Carsten Junker Vogler. / Scenario realism and welfare estimates in choice experiments - a non-market valuation study on the European water framework directive. I: Journal of Environmental Management. 2012 ; Bind 94, Nr. 1. s. 25-33.

Bibtex

@article{ee433cf6c53340fbad50405e6771d5bc,
title = "Scenario realism and welfare estimates in choice experiments - a non-market valuation study on the European water framework directive",
abstract = "Using choice experiment data for economic valuation we analyse how disbelief in survey information could affect the retrieved welfare estimates. We distinguish between two types of survey information to the respondents. The first type of information concerns the current environmental status of a water body. This information is provided prior to the valuation questions and the corresponding beliefs in the provided information are also elicited before valuation. The second type of information concerns the proposed improvements in the environmental status of the water body. We find that average welfare measures differ considerably according to whether respondents who disagree with the status quo levels and find proposed scenarios unlikely are included or not.",
author = "Mitesh Kataria and I. Bateman and Tove Christensen and Alex Dubgaard and Berit Hasler and S. Hime and J. Ladenburg and Gregor Levin and Louise Martinsen and Nissen, {Carsten Junker Vogler}",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.08.010",
language = "English",
volume = "94",
pages = "25--33",
journal = "Journal of Environmental Management",
issn = "0301-4797",
publisher = "Academic Press",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Scenario realism and welfare estimates in choice experiments - a non-market valuation study on the European water framework directive

AU - Kataria, Mitesh

AU - Bateman, I.

AU - Christensen, Tove

AU - Dubgaard, Alex

AU - Hasler, Berit

AU - Hime, S.

AU - Ladenburg, J.

AU - Levin, Gregor

AU - Martinsen, Louise

AU - Nissen, Carsten Junker Vogler

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - Using choice experiment data for economic valuation we analyse how disbelief in survey information could affect the retrieved welfare estimates. We distinguish between two types of survey information to the respondents. The first type of information concerns the current environmental status of a water body. This information is provided prior to the valuation questions and the corresponding beliefs in the provided information are also elicited before valuation. The second type of information concerns the proposed improvements in the environmental status of the water body. We find that average welfare measures differ considerably according to whether respondents who disagree with the status quo levels and find proposed scenarios unlikely are included or not.

AB - Using choice experiment data for economic valuation we analyse how disbelief in survey information could affect the retrieved welfare estimates. We distinguish between two types of survey information to the respondents. The first type of information concerns the current environmental status of a water body. This information is provided prior to the valuation questions and the corresponding beliefs in the provided information are also elicited before valuation. The second type of information concerns the proposed improvements in the environmental status of the water body. We find that average welfare measures differ considerably according to whether respondents who disagree with the status quo levels and find proposed scenarios unlikely are included or not.

U2 - 10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.08.010

DO - 10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.08.010

M3 - Journal article

VL - 94

SP - 25

EP - 33

JO - Journal of Environmental Management

JF - Journal of Environmental Management

SN - 0301-4797

IS - 1

ER -

ID: 35409702