Trends in research on forestry decentralization policies

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelfagfællebedømt

Standard

Trends in research on forestry decentralization policies. / Lund, Jens Friis; Rutt, Rebecca Leigh; Ribot, Jesse.

I: Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, Bind 32, 2018, s. 17-22.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Lund, JF, Rutt, RL & Ribot, J 2018, 'Trends in research on forestry decentralization policies', Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, bind 32, s. 17-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2018.02.003

APA

Lund, J. F., Rutt, R. L., & Ribot, J. (2018). Trends in research on forestry decentralization policies. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 32, 17-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2018.02.003

Vancouver

Lund JF, Rutt RL, Ribot J. Trends in research on forestry decentralization policies. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 2018;32:17-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2018.02.003

Author

Lund, Jens Friis ; Rutt, Rebecca Leigh ; Ribot, Jesse. / Trends in research on forestry decentralization policies. I: Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 2018 ; Bind 32. s. 17-22.

Bibtex

@article{eca09e0dd7124df593725246e21f1bfe,
title = "Trends in research on forestry decentralization policies",
abstract = "We identify and describe four strands in the literature on forestry decentralization policies: studies that assess impacts of forestry sector decentralization policies on forests and livelihoods; studies that examine whether forestry decentralization empowers public and democratic local institutions; studies focusing on power and the role of elites in forestry decentralization, and; studies that historicize and contextualize forestry decentralization as reflective of broader societal phenomena. We argue that these strands reflect disciplinary differences in values, epistemologies, and methods preferences, and that they individually provide only partial representations of forestry decentralization policies. Accordingly, we conclude that a comprehensive understanding of these policies cannot rest solely on any of these strands, but should be informed by all of them.",
author = "Lund, {Jens Friis} and Rutt, {Rebecca Leigh} and Jesse Ribot",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.1016/j.cosust.2018.02.003",
language = "English",
volume = "32",
pages = "17--22",
journal = "Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability",
issn = "1877-3435",
publisher = "Elsevier Ltd. * Current Opinion Journals",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Trends in research on forestry decentralization policies

AU - Lund, Jens Friis

AU - Rutt, Rebecca Leigh

AU - Ribot, Jesse

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - We identify and describe four strands in the literature on forestry decentralization policies: studies that assess impacts of forestry sector decentralization policies on forests and livelihoods; studies that examine whether forestry decentralization empowers public and democratic local institutions; studies focusing on power and the role of elites in forestry decentralization, and; studies that historicize and contextualize forestry decentralization as reflective of broader societal phenomena. We argue that these strands reflect disciplinary differences in values, epistemologies, and methods preferences, and that they individually provide only partial representations of forestry decentralization policies. Accordingly, we conclude that a comprehensive understanding of these policies cannot rest solely on any of these strands, but should be informed by all of them.

AB - We identify and describe four strands in the literature on forestry decentralization policies: studies that assess impacts of forestry sector decentralization policies on forests and livelihoods; studies that examine whether forestry decentralization empowers public and democratic local institutions; studies focusing on power and the role of elites in forestry decentralization, and; studies that historicize and contextualize forestry decentralization as reflective of broader societal phenomena. We argue that these strands reflect disciplinary differences in values, epistemologies, and methods preferences, and that they individually provide only partial representations of forestry decentralization policies. Accordingly, we conclude that a comprehensive understanding of these policies cannot rest solely on any of these strands, but should be informed by all of them.

U2 - 10.1016/j.cosust.2018.02.003

DO - 10.1016/j.cosust.2018.02.003

M3 - Journal article

AN - SCOPUS:85042485877

VL - 32

SP - 17

EP - 22

JO - Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability

JF - Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability

SN - 1877-3435

ER -

ID: 194727969