A meta-study investigating the sources of protest behaviour in stated preference surveys

Publikation: Konferencebidrag › Paper › Forskning

Standard

A meta-study investigating the sources of protest behaviour in stated preference surveys. / Mørkbak, Morten Raun; Olsen, Søren Bøye; Meyerhoff, Jürgen.

2010. Paper præsenteret ved World Congress of Environmental and Resource Economists 2010, Montreal, Canada.

Publikation: Konferencebidrag › Paper › Forskning

Harvard

Mørkbak, MR, Olsen, SB & Meyerhoff, J 2010, 'A meta-study investigating the sources of protest behaviour in stated preference surveys', Paper fremlagt ved World Congress of Environmental and Resource Economists 2010, Montreal, Canada, 28/06/2010 - 02/07/2010. <http://www.wcere2010.org/index.htm>

APA

Mørkbak, M. R., Olsen, S. B., & Meyerhoff, J. (2010). A meta-study investigating the sources of protest behaviour in stated preference surveys. Paper præsenteret ved World Congress of Environmental and Resource Economists 2010, Montreal, Canada. http://www.wcere2010.org/index.htm

Vancouver

Mørkbak MR, Olsen SB, Meyerhoff J. A meta-study investigating the sources of protest behaviour in stated preference surveys. 2010. Paper præsenteret ved World Congress of Environmental and Resource Economists 2010, Montreal, Canada.

Author

Mørkbak, Morten Raun ; Olsen, Søren Bøye ; Meyerhoff, Jürgen. / A meta-study investigating the sources of protest behaviour in stated preference surveys. Paper præsenteret ved World Congress of Environmental and Resource Economists 2010, Montreal, Canada.23 s.

Bibtex

@conference{c73f6b40d6ae11df825b000ea68e967b,
title = "A meta-study investigating the sources of protest behaviour in stated preference surveys",
abstract = " It is well known that some percentage of respondents participating in Stated Preferencesurveys will not give responses which reflect their true preferences. One reason is protestbehaviour. If the distribution of protest responses is not independent of respondentdemographics, the elicitation method, the question format, etc., then simply expellingprotesters from surveys will lead to sample selection issues. Furthermore, WTP estimateswill not be comparable across surveys. This paper seeks to explore potential causes ofprotest behaviour through a meta-study based on data from 10 different surveys. Theobjective of the study is to examine the effect of respondent specific variables as well assurvey specific variables on protest behaviour. Our results suggest that some of thedifferences in WTP typically observed between different demographic groups, differentelicitation formats and different question formats might actually be attributed to inherentdifferences in the propensity to protest. Our results indicate that the propensity forrespondents to exhibit protest behaviour when asked a stated preference type valuationquestion depends on a number of specific factors, respondent specific as well as surveyspecific.",
author = "M{\o}rkbak, {Morten Raun} and Olsen, {S{\o}ren B{\o}ye} and J{\"u}rgen Meyerhoff",
note = "Sider: 1-23; null ; Conference date: 28-06-2010 Through 02-07-2010",
year = "2010",
language = "English",

}

RIS

TY - CONF

T1 - A meta-study investigating the sources of protest behaviour in stated preference surveys

AU - Mørkbak, Morten Raun

AU - Olsen, Søren Bøye

AU - Meyerhoff, Jürgen

N1 - Conference code: 4

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 -  It is well known that some percentage of respondents participating in Stated Preferencesurveys will not give responses which reflect their true preferences. One reason is protestbehaviour. If the distribution of protest responses is not independent of respondentdemographics, the elicitation method, the question format, etc., then simply expellingprotesters from surveys will lead to sample selection issues. Furthermore, WTP estimateswill not be comparable across surveys. This paper seeks to explore potential causes ofprotest behaviour through a meta-study based on data from 10 different surveys. Theobjective of the study is to examine the effect of respondent specific variables as well assurvey specific variables on protest behaviour. Our results suggest that some of thedifferences in WTP typically observed between different demographic groups, differentelicitation formats and different question formats might actually be attributed to inherentdifferences in the propensity to protest. Our results indicate that the propensity forrespondents to exhibit protest behaviour when asked a stated preference type valuationquestion depends on a number of specific factors, respondent specific as well as surveyspecific.

AB -  It is well known that some percentage of respondents participating in Stated Preferencesurveys will not give responses which reflect their true preferences. One reason is protestbehaviour. If the distribution of protest responses is not independent of respondentdemographics, the elicitation method, the question format, etc., then simply expellingprotesters from surveys will lead to sample selection issues. Furthermore, WTP estimateswill not be comparable across surveys. This paper seeks to explore potential causes ofprotest behaviour through a meta-study based on data from 10 different surveys. Theobjective of the study is to examine the effect of respondent specific variables as well assurvey specific variables on protest behaviour. Our results suggest that some of thedifferences in WTP typically observed between different demographic groups, differentelicitation formats and different question formats might actually be attributed to inherentdifferences in the propensity to protest. Our results indicate that the propensity forrespondents to exhibit protest behaviour when asked a stated preference type valuationquestion depends on a number of specific factors, respondent specific as well as surveyspecific.

M3 - Paper

Y2 - 28 June 2010 through 2 July 2010

ER -

ID: 22478172