Economic gains fromtargeted measures related to non-point pollution in agriculture based on detailed nitrate reduction maps
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Standard
Economic gains fromtargeted measures related to non-point pollution in agriculture based on detailed nitrate reduction maps. / Jacobsen, Brian H.; Hansen, Anne Lausten.
In: Science of the Total Environment, Vol. 556, 2016, p. 264–275.Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Economic gains fromtargeted measures related to non-point pollution in agriculture based on detailed nitrate reduction maps
AU - Jacobsen, Brian H.
AU - Hansen, Anne Lausten
PY - 2016
Y1 - 2016
N2 - From 1990 to 2003, Denmark reduced N-leaching from the root zone by 50%. However, more measures are required, and in recent years, the focus has been on how to differentiate measures in order to ensure that they are implemented where the effect on N-loss reductions per ha is the greatest. The purpose of the NiCA project has been to estimate the natural nitrate reduction in the groundwater more precisely than before using a plot size down to 1 ha. This article builds on these findings and presents the possible economic gains for the farmer when using this information to reach a given N-loss level. Targeted measures are especially relevant where the subsurface N-reduction varies significantly within the same farm and national analyses have shown that a costreduction of around 20–25% using targeted measures is likely. The analyses show an increasing potential with increasing variation in N-reduction in the catchment. In this analysis, the knowledge of spatial variation in N-reduction potential is used to place measures like catch crops or set-a-side at locations with the greatest effect on 10 case farms in the Norsminde Catchment, Denmark. The findings suggest that the gains are from 0 to 32 €/ha and the average farm would gain approximately 14–21 €/ha/year from the targeted measures approach. The analysis indicates that the economic gain is greater than the costs of providing the detailed maps of 5–10 €/ha/year. When N-loss reduction requirements are increased, the economic gains are greater.When combined with new measures like mini-wetlands and early sowing the economic advantage is increased further. The paper also shows that not all farms can use the detailed information on N-reduction and there is not a clear link between spatial variation in N-reduction at the farm level and possible economic gains for all these 10 farms.
AB - From 1990 to 2003, Denmark reduced N-leaching from the root zone by 50%. However, more measures are required, and in recent years, the focus has been on how to differentiate measures in order to ensure that they are implemented where the effect on N-loss reductions per ha is the greatest. The purpose of the NiCA project has been to estimate the natural nitrate reduction in the groundwater more precisely than before using a plot size down to 1 ha. This article builds on these findings and presents the possible economic gains for the farmer when using this information to reach a given N-loss level. Targeted measures are especially relevant where the subsurface N-reduction varies significantly within the same farm and national analyses have shown that a costreduction of around 20–25% using targeted measures is likely. The analyses show an increasing potential with increasing variation in N-reduction in the catchment. In this analysis, the knowledge of spatial variation in N-reduction potential is used to place measures like catch crops or set-a-side at locations with the greatest effect on 10 case farms in the Norsminde Catchment, Denmark. The findings suggest that the gains are from 0 to 32 €/ha and the average farm would gain approximately 14–21 €/ha/year from the targeted measures approach. The analysis indicates that the economic gain is greater than the costs of providing the detailed maps of 5–10 €/ha/year. When N-loss reduction requirements are increased, the economic gains are greater.When combined with new measures like mini-wetlands and early sowing the economic advantage is increased further. The paper also shows that not all farms can use the detailed information on N-reduction and there is not a clear link between spatial variation in N-reduction at the farm level and possible economic gains for all these 10 farms.
U2 - 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.01.103
DO - 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.01.103
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 26974574
VL - 556
SP - 264
EP - 275
JO - Science of the Total Environment
JF - Science of the Total Environment
SN - 0048-9697
ER -
ID: 157505313