Economic gains fromtargeted measures related to non-point pollution in agriculture based on detailed nitrate reduction maps

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Economic gains fromtargeted measures related to non-point pollution in agriculture based on detailed nitrate reduction maps. / Jacobsen, Brian H.; Hansen, Anne Lausten.

In: Science of the Total Environment, Vol. 556, 2016, p. 264–275.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Jacobsen, BH & Hansen, AL 2016, 'Economic gains fromtargeted measures related to non-point pollution in agriculture based on detailed nitrate reduction maps', Science of the Total Environment, vol. 556, pp. 264–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.01.103

APA

Jacobsen, B. H., & Hansen, A. L. (2016). Economic gains fromtargeted measures related to non-point pollution in agriculture based on detailed nitrate reduction maps. Science of the Total Environment, 556, 264–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.01.103

Vancouver

Jacobsen BH, Hansen AL. Economic gains fromtargeted measures related to non-point pollution in agriculture based on detailed nitrate reduction maps. Science of the Total Environment. 2016;556:264–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.01.103

Author

Jacobsen, Brian H. ; Hansen, Anne Lausten. / Economic gains fromtargeted measures related to non-point pollution in agriculture based on detailed nitrate reduction maps. In: Science of the Total Environment. 2016 ; Vol. 556. pp. 264–275.

Bibtex

@article{9e9e75cba9f046a08bcafb3e793e0325,
title = "Economic gains fromtargeted measures related to non-point pollution in agriculture based on detailed nitrate reduction maps",
abstract = "From 1990 to 2003, Denmark reduced N-leaching from the root zone by 50%. However, more measures are required, and in recent years, the focus has been on how to differentiate measures in order to ensure that they are implemented where the effect on N-loss reductions per ha is the greatest. The purpose of the NiCA project has been to estimate the natural nitrate reduction in the groundwater more precisely than before using a plot size down to 1 ha. This article builds on these findings and presents the possible economic gains for the farmer when using this information to reach a given N-loss level. Targeted measures are especially relevant where the subsurface N-reduction varies significantly within the same farm and national analyses have shown that a costreduction of around 20–25% using targeted measures is likely. The analyses show an increasing potential with increasing variation in N-reduction in the catchment. In this analysis, the knowledge of spatial variation in N-reduction potential is used to place measures like catch crops or set-a-side at locations with the greatest effect on 10 case farms in the Norsminde Catchment, Denmark. The findings suggest that the gains are from 0 to 32 €/ha and the average farm would gain approximately 14–21 €/ha/year from the targeted measures approach. The analysis indicates that the economic gain is greater than the costs of providing the detailed maps of 5–10 €/ha/year. When N-loss reduction requirements are increased, the economic gains are greater.When combined with new measures like mini-wetlands and early sowing the economic advantage is increased further. The paper also shows that not all farms can use the detailed information on N-reduction and there is not a clear link between spatial variation in N-reduction at the farm level and possible economic gains for all these 10 farms.",
author = "Jacobsen, {Brian H.} and Hansen, {Anne Lausten}",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.01.103",
language = "English",
volume = "556",
pages = "264–275",
journal = "Science of the Total Environment",
issn = "0048-9697",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Economic gains fromtargeted measures related to non-point pollution in agriculture based on detailed nitrate reduction maps

AU - Jacobsen, Brian H.

AU - Hansen, Anne Lausten

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - From 1990 to 2003, Denmark reduced N-leaching from the root zone by 50%. However, more measures are required, and in recent years, the focus has been on how to differentiate measures in order to ensure that they are implemented where the effect on N-loss reductions per ha is the greatest. The purpose of the NiCA project has been to estimate the natural nitrate reduction in the groundwater more precisely than before using a plot size down to 1 ha. This article builds on these findings and presents the possible economic gains for the farmer when using this information to reach a given N-loss level. Targeted measures are especially relevant where the subsurface N-reduction varies significantly within the same farm and national analyses have shown that a costreduction of around 20–25% using targeted measures is likely. The analyses show an increasing potential with increasing variation in N-reduction in the catchment. In this analysis, the knowledge of spatial variation in N-reduction potential is used to place measures like catch crops or set-a-side at locations with the greatest effect on 10 case farms in the Norsminde Catchment, Denmark. The findings suggest that the gains are from 0 to 32 €/ha and the average farm would gain approximately 14–21 €/ha/year from the targeted measures approach. The analysis indicates that the economic gain is greater than the costs of providing the detailed maps of 5–10 €/ha/year. When N-loss reduction requirements are increased, the economic gains are greater.When combined with new measures like mini-wetlands and early sowing the economic advantage is increased further. The paper also shows that not all farms can use the detailed information on N-reduction and there is not a clear link between spatial variation in N-reduction at the farm level and possible economic gains for all these 10 farms.

AB - From 1990 to 2003, Denmark reduced N-leaching from the root zone by 50%. However, more measures are required, and in recent years, the focus has been on how to differentiate measures in order to ensure that they are implemented where the effect on N-loss reductions per ha is the greatest. The purpose of the NiCA project has been to estimate the natural nitrate reduction in the groundwater more precisely than before using a plot size down to 1 ha. This article builds on these findings and presents the possible economic gains for the farmer when using this information to reach a given N-loss level. Targeted measures are especially relevant where the subsurface N-reduction varies significantly within the same farm and national analyses have shown that a costreduction of around 20–25% using targeted measures is likely. The analyses show an increasing potential with increasing variation in N-reduction in the catchment. In this analysis, the knowledge of spatial variation in N-reduction potential is used to place measures like catch crops or set-a-side at locations with the greatest effect on 10 case farms in the Norsminde Catchment, Denmark. The findings suggest that the gains are from 0 to 32 €/ha and the average farm would gain approximately 14–21 €/ha/year from the targeted measures approach. The analysis indicates that the economic gain is greater than the costs of providing the detailed maps of 5–10 €/ha/year. When N-loss reduction requirements are increased, the economic gains are greater.When combined with new measures like mini-wetlands and early sowing the economic advantage is increased further. The paper also shows that not all farms can use the detailed information on N-reduction and there is not a clear link between spatial variation in N-reduction at the farm level and possible economic gains for all these 10 farms.

U2 - 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.01.103

DO - 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.01.103

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 26974574

VL - 556

SP - 264

EP - 275

JO - Science of the Total Environment

JF - Science of the Total Environment

SN - 0048-9697

ER -

ID: 157505313