Staff at Department of Food and Resource Economics – University of Copenhagen

Forward this page to a friend Resize Print Bookmark and Share

English > Staff

Can community members identify tropical tree species for REDD+ carbon and biodiversity measurements?

Publication: Research - peer-reviewJournal article

Mingxu Zhao, Søren Brofeldt, Qiaohong Li, Jianchu Xu, Finn Danielsen, Simon Bjarke Lægaard Læssøe, Michael Køie Poulsen, Anna Gottlieb, James Franklin Maxwell, Ida Theilade

Biodiversity conservation is a required co-benefit of REDD+. Biodiversity monitoring is therefore needed, yet in most areas it will be constrained by limitations in the available human professional and financial resources. REDD+ programs that use forest plots for biomass monitoring may be able to take advantage of the same data for detecting changes in the tree diversity, using the richness and abundance of canopy trees as a proxy for biodiversity. If local community members are already assessing the above-ground biomass in a representative network of forest vegetation plots, it may require minimal further effort to collect data on the diversity of trees. We compare community members and trained scientists' data on tree diversity in permanent vegetation plots in montane forest in Yunnan, China. We show that local community members here can collect tree diversity data of comparable quality to trained botanists, at one third the cost. Without access to herbaria, identification guides or the Internet, community members could provide the ethno-taxonomical names for 95% of 1071 trees in 60 vegetation plots. Moreover, we show that the community-led survey spent 89% of the expenses at village level as opposed to 23% of funds in the monitoring by botanists. In participatory REDD+ programs in areas where community members demonstrate great knowledge of forest trees, community-based collection of tree diversity data can be a cost-effective approach for obtaining tree diversity information.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere0152061
JournalPloS one
Volume11
Issue number11
Number of pages16
ISSN1932-6203
DOIs
StatePublished - 2016

Number of downloads are based on statistics from Google Scholar and www.ku.dk


No data available

ID: 168883551