Testing for cross-subsidisation in the combined heat and power generation sector: a comparison of three tests

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Standard

Testing for cross-subsidisation in the combined heat and power generation sector : a comparison of three tests. / Amundsen, Eirik S; Andersen, Per ; Jensen, Frank.

In: Energy Economics, Vol. 33, No. 5, 2011, p. 750–757.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Harvard

Amundsen, ES, Andersen, P & Jensen, F 2011, 'Testing for cross-subsidisation in the combined heat and power generation sector: a comparison of three tests', Energy Economics, vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 750–757. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2010.12.013

APA

Amundsen, E. S., Andersen, P., & Jensen, F. (2011). Testing for cross-subsidisation in the combined heat and power generation sector: a comparison of three tests. Energy Economics, 33(5), 750–757. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2010.12.013

Vancouver

Amundsen ES, Andersen P, Jensen F. Testing for cross-subsidisation in the combined heat and power generation sector: a comparison of three tests. Energy Economics. 2011;33(5):750–757. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2010.12.013

Author

Amundsen, Eirik S ; Andersen, Per ; Jensen, Frank. / Testing for cross-subsidisation in the combined heat and power generation sector : a comparison of three tests. In: Energy Economics. 2011 ; Vol. 33, No. 5. pp. 750–757.

Bibtex

@article{c6ba57faa5cd4d45a4400616a5c0fa2e,
title = "Testing for cross-subsidisation in the combined heat and power generation sector: a comparison of three tests",
abstract = "In this paper we examine cross-subsidisation among combined heat and power producers in Denmark.Information on stand-alone costs for heat generation allows us to empirically compare the Faulhaber tests,tests with an upper bound on stand-alone costs (the Palmer tests) and the fully distributed cost test (FDC). All tests indicate a substantial amount of cross-subsidisation from heat generation to power generation. It is shown that the FDC test is closer to that of the Faulhaber tests in its results than the Palmer tests. Thus as the Faulhaber tests are considered in the literature to be the theoretically correct tests, the FDC test is shown to be the best approximation for tests of cross-subsidisation for this specific sector.",
author = "Amundsen, {Eirik S} and Per Andersen and Frank Jensen",
year = "2011",
doi = "10.1016/j.eneco.2010.12.013",
language = "English",
volume = "33",
pages = "750–757",
journal = "Energy Economics",
issn = "0140-9883",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "5",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Testing for cross-subsidisation in the combined heat and power generation sector

T2 - a comparison of three tests

AU - Amundsen, Eirik S

AU - Andersen, Per

AU - Jensen, Frank

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - In this paper we examine cross-subsidisation among combined heat and power producers in Denmark.Information on stand-alone costs for heat generation allows us to empirically compare the Faulhaber tests,tests with an upper bound on stand-alone costs (the Palmer tests) and the fully distributed cost test (FDC). All tests indicate a substantial amount of cross-subsidisation from heat generation to power generation. It is shown that the FDC test is closer to that of the Faulhaber tests in its results than the Palmer tests. Thus as the Faulhaber tests are considered in the literature to be the theoretically correct tests, the FDC test is shown to be the best approximation for tests of cross-subsidisation for this specific sector.

AB - In this paper we examine cross-subsidisation among combined heat and power producers in Denmark.Information on stand-alone costs for heat generation allows us to empirically compare the Faulhaber tests,tests with an upper bound on stand-alone costs (the Palmer tests) and the fully distributed cost test (FDC). All tests indicate a substantial amount of cross-subsidisation from heat generation to power generation. It is shown that the FDC test is closer to that of the Faulhaber tests in its results than the Palmer tests. Thus as the Faulhaber tests are considered in the literature to be the theoretically correct tests, the FDC test is shown to be the best approximation for tests of cross-subsidisation for this specific sector.

U2 - 10.1016/j.eneco.2010.12.013

DO - 10.1016/j.eneco.2010.12.013

M3 - Journal article

VL - 33

SP - 750

EP - 757

JO - Energy Economics

JF - Energy Economics

SN - 0140-9883

IS - 5

ER -

ID: 34354921