Corporate climate futures in the making: Why we need research on the politics of Science-Based Targets
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Standard
Corporate climate futures in the making : Why we need research on the politics of Science-Based Targets. / Tilsted, Joachim Peter; Palm, Ellen; Bjørn, Anders; Lund, Jens Friis.
In: Energy Research and Social Science, Vol. 103, 103229, 2023.Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Corporate climate futures in the making
T2 - Why we need research on the politics of Science-Based Targets
AU - Tilsted, Joachim Peter
AU - Palm, Ellen
AU - Bjørn, Anders
AU - Lund, Jens Friis
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2023 The Authors
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - In this Perspective article, we call for more scholarly attention to the politics of the Science-Based Targets initiative (SBTi). Specifically, we argue for a need to examine the emission pathways and decarbonised futures that are expressed and promoted through Science-Based Targets and what futures they render more likely in the pursuit of low-carbon transitions. We highlight how the SBTi's guidance material is characterized by a narrow and linear view of science (as input) as well as a similarly narrow portrayal of decarbonised futures (as outcome), despite the negotiated character of target-setting and the open-endedness of transitions. The SBTi thus currently tends towards obscuring the politics embedded within it and promoting an incumbent-driven transition, thereby legitimizing a transition shaped by some of the world's largest corporations and, in this sense, shielding them from democratic control. This argument illustrates the need for more scholarly engagement with the politics of knowledge that informs the SBTi and its governance framework. On a broader note, it highlights the need for continued critical engagement with corporate climate governance as it develops and takes on more ambitious forms.
AB - In this Perspective article, we call for more scholarly attention to the politics of the Science-Based Targets initiative (SBTi). Specifically, we argue for a need to examine the emission pathways and decarbonised futures that are expressed and promoted through Science-Based Targets and what futures they render more likely in the pursuit of low-carbon transitions. We highlight how the SBTi's guidance material is characterized by a narrow and linear view of science (as input) as well as a similarly narrow portrayal of decarbonised futures (as outcome), despite the negotiated character of target-setting and the open-endedness of transitions. The SBTi thus currently tends towards obscuring the politics embedded within it and promoting an incumbent-driven transition, thereby legitimizing a transition shaped by some of the world's largest corporations and, in this sense, shielding them from democratic control. This argument illustrates the need for more scholarly engagement with the politics of knowledge that informs the SBTi and its governance framework. On a broader note, it highlights the need for continued critical engagement with corporate climate governance as it develops and takes on more ambitious forms.
KW - Corporate climate governance
KW - Emission pathways
KW - Incumbency
KW - Paris agreement
KW - Science-based targets
U2 - 10.1016/j.erss.2023.103229
DO - 10.1016/j.erss.2023.103229
M3 - Journal article
AN - SCOPUS:85169883253
VL - 103
JO - Energy Research & Social Science
JF - Energy Research & Social Science
SN - 2214-6296
M1 - 103229
ER -
ID: 370568473