Identifying institutional configurations for policy outcomes: A comparison of ecosystem services delivery
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Standard
Identifying institutional configurations for policy outcomes : A comparison of ecosystem services delivery. / Bazzan, Giulia; Candel, Jeroen; Daugbjerg, Carsten; Pecurul, Mireia.
In: Policy Studies Journal, Vol. 51, No. 3, 2023, p. 501-527.Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Identifying institutional configurations for policy outcomes
T2 - A comparison of ecosystem services delivery
AU - Bazzan, Giulia
AU - Candel, Jeroen
AU - Daugbjerg, Carsten
AU - Pecurul, Mireia
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2022 The Authors. Policy Studies Journal published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Policy Studies Organization.
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - This paper employs the Institutional Analysis and Development framework across six ecosystem delivery measures in the European Union to develop a configurational explanation of (un)successful outcomes. By undertaking comparative institutional analysis, we systematically examine the effect of variation across rule types and generate insights on how different institutional configurations result in varying degrees of successful implementation of ecosystem delivery measures. We apply explanatory typology methods to identify the institutional features that best explain variation in implementation success across a number of cases. We argue that institutional rules shape outcomes in conjunction rather than in isolation. The findings show that differences in implementation success across cases can be explained by the interplay of differences in knowledge exchange, flexibility in implementation, and participation in the policy design process.
AB - This paper employs the Institutional Analysis and Development framework across six ecosystem delivery measures in the European Union to develop a configurational explanation of (un)successful outcomes. By undertaking comparative institutional analysis, we systematically examine the effect of variation across rule types and generate insights on how different institutional configurations result in varying degrees of successful implementation of ecosystem delivery measures. We apply explanatory typology methods to identify the institutional features that best explain variation in implementation success across a number of cases. We argue that institutional rules shape outcomes in conjunction rather than in isolation. The findings show that differences in implementation success across cases can be explained by the interplay of differences in knowledge exchange, flexibility in implementation, and participation in the policy design process.
KW - comparative methods
KW - configurational explanation
KW - ecosystem delivery measures
KW - implementation success
KW - institutional analysis
U2 - 10.1111/psj.12476
DO - 10.1111/psj.12476
M3 - Journal article
AN - SCOPUS:85136522904
VL - 51
SP - 501
EP - 527
JO - Policy Studies Journal
JF - Policy Studies Journal
SN - 0190-292X
IS - 3
ER -
ID: 318431088