Ethical distinctions between different kinds of plant breeding
Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Article in proceedings › Research › peer-review
Standard
Ethical distinctions between different kinds of plant breeding. / Myskja, B.K.; Schouten, H.J.; Gjerris, Mickey.
Know your food: food ethics and innovation. ed. / Diana Elena Dumitras; Ionel Mugurel Jitea; Stef Aerts. Vol. 1 Wageningen : Wageningen Academic Publishers, 2015. p. 95-100.Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Article in proceedings › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - GEN
T1 - Ethical distinctions between different kinds of plant breeding
AU - Myskja, B.K.
AU - Schouten, H.J.
AU - Gjerris, Mickey
N1 - Conference code: 12
PY - 2015
Y1 - 2015
N2 - The article discusses whether there are ethically significant distinctions between different forms of plant breeding. We distinguish different forms of plant breeding according to the kind of technology and degree of human intervention compared to plant reproduction occurring in nature. According to the dominant scientific view, the main concerns are issues of biosafety that are dealt with through risk assessment. Thus, the techniques are ethically equivalent and only the resulting product is of interest. In parts of the societal and philosophical discourse, however, there are attempts to distinguish ethically between these approaches, often relying on ambiguous concepts such as ‘naturalness’. We argue that a virtue-based approach can be used to explicate the assumptions behind such distinctions that are relevant for scientific and public discourse, and support a conclusion that there are ethical differences between plant breeding methods. The framework can contribute to an improved dialogue between the scientific community and the wider public by making the scepticism towards GM-technology more intelligible.
AB - The article discusses whether there are ethically significant distinctions between different forms of plant breeding. We distinguish different forms of plant breeding according to the kind of technology and degree of human intervention compared to plant reproduction occurring in nature. According to the dominant scientific view, the main concerns are issues of biosafety that are dealt with through risk assessment. Thus, the techniques are ethically equivalent and only the resulting product is of interest. In parts of the societal and philosophical discourse, however, there are attempts to distinguish ethically between these approaches, often relying on ambiguous concepts such as ‘naturalness’. We argue that a virtue-based approach can be used to explicate the assumptions behind such distinctions that are relevant for scientific and public discourse, and support a conclusion that there are ethical differences between plant breeding methods. The framework can contribute to an improved dialogue between the scientific community and the wider public by making the scepticism towards GM-technology more intelligible.
U2 - 10.3920/978-90-8686-813-1_13
DO - 10.3920/978-90-8686-813-1_13
M3 - Article in proceedings
SN - 978-90-8686-264-1
VL - 1
SP - 95
EP - 100
BT - Know your food
A2 - Dumitras, Diana Elena
A2 - Mugurel Jitea, Ionel
A2 - Aerts, Stef
PB - Wageningen Academic Publishers
CY - Wageningen
T2 - 12th Congress of the European Society for Agricultural and Food Ethics
Y2 - 28 May 2015 through 30 May 2015
ER -
ID: 141293633