Gender anomalies in stated preference surveys – are biases really gender dependent?

Research output: Working paper

Standard

Gender anomalies in stated preference surveys – are biases really gender dependent? / Ladenburg, Jacob ; Olsen, Søren Bøye.

2010.

Research output: Working paper

Harvard

Ladenburg, J & Olsen, SB 2010 'Gender anomalies in stated preference surveys – are biases really gender dependent?'. <http://econpapers.repec.org/RePEc:foi:wpaper:2010_01>

APA

Ladenburg, J., & Olsen, S. B. (2010). Gender anomalies in stated preference surveys – are biases really gender dependent? FOI Working Paper No. 2010/1 http://econpapers.repec.org/RePEc:foi:wpaper:2010_01

Vancouver

Ladenburg J, Olsen SB. Gender anomalies in stated preference surveys – are biases really gender dependent? 2010.

Author

Ladenburg, Jacob ; Olsen, Søren Bøye. / Gender anomalies in stated preference surveys – are biases really gender dependent?. 2010. (FOI Working Paper; No. 2010/1).

Bibtex

@techreport{24385136c13c4d8599abdfdfbde200b9,
title = "Gender anomalies in stated preference surveys – are biases really gender dependent?",
abstract = "The potential for a number of common but severe biases in stated preference method surveys being gender dependent has been largely overlooked in the literature. In this paper we summarize results from three Choice Experiment studies that find evidence in favor of gender differences in vulnerability to biases. Specifically, the results indicate that women are more susceptible to starting point bias than men, while men are more susceptible to hypothetical bias than women. This seems to be interrelated with women inherently being more uncertain than men when choosing from a choice set. Furthermore,we set up a novel theoretical model, which provides an explanation for gender specific susceptibility to biases. We conclude that biases can indeed be gender dependent. Hence, researchers should not simply disregard potential gender differences, but rather take them into account and examine the extent of them when performing surveys. Finally, we give suggestions for future research in this area.",
author = "Jacob Ladenburg and Olsen, {S{\o}ren B{\o}ye}",
year = "2010",
language = "Dansk",
series = "FOI Working Paper",
publisher = "F{\o}devare{\o}konomisk Institut, K{\o}benhavns Universitet",
number = "2010/1",
type = "WorkingPaper",
institution = "F{\o}devare{\o}konomisk Institut, K{\o}benhavns Universitet",

}

RIS

TY - UNPB

T1 - Gender anomalies in stated preference surveys – are biases really gender dependent?

AU - Ladenburg, Jacob

AU - Olsen, Søren Bøye

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - The potential for a number of common but severe biases in stated preference method surveys being gender dependent has been largely overlooked in the literature. In this paper we summarize results from three Choice Experiment studies that find evidence in favor of gender differences in vulnerability to biases. Specifically, the results indicate that women are more susceptible to starting point bias than men, while men are more susceptible to hypothetical bias than women. This seems to be interrelated with women inherently being more uncertain than men when choosing from a choice set. Furthermore,we set up a novel theoretical model, which provides an explanation for gender specific susceptibility to biases. We conclude that biases can indeed be gender dependent. Hence, researchers should not simply disregard potential gender differences, but rather take them into account and examine the extent of them when performing surveys. Finally, we give suggestions for future research in this area.

AB - The potential for a number of common but severe biases in stated preference method surveys being gender dependent has been largely overlooked in the literature. In this paper we summarize results from three Choice Experiment studies that find evidence in favor of gender differences in vulnerability to biases. Specifically, the results indicate that women are more susceptible to starting point bias than men, while men are more susceptible to hypothetical bias than women. This seems to be interrelated with women inherently being more uncertain than men when choosing from a choice set. Furthermore,we set up a novel theoretical model, which provides an explanation for gender specific susceptibility to biases. We conclude that biases can indeed be gender dependent. Hence, researchers should not simply disregard potential gender differences, but rather take them into account and examine the extent of them when performing surveys. Finally, we give suggestions for future research in this area.

M3 - Working paper

T3 - FOI Working Paper

BT - Gender anomalies in stated preference surveys – are biases really gender dependent?

ER -

ID: 33013738