How to minimise direct pesticide load on bees: regional hotspots and the role of MWD systems

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaperResearch

Standard

How to minimise direct pesticide load on bees : regional hotspots and the role of MWD systems. / Ørum, Jens Erik; Navntoft, Søren .

2010. Paper presented at GeoFARMatics2010 International Conference, Köln, Germany.

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaperResearch

Harvard

Ørum, JE & Navntoft, S 2010, 'How to minimise direct pesticide load on bees: regional hotspots and the role of MWD systems', Paper presented at GeoFARMatics2010 International Conference, Köln, Germany, 24/11/2010 - 26/11/2010.

APA

Ørum, J. E., & Navntoft, S. (2010). How to minimise direct pesticide load on bees: regional hotspots and the role of MWD systems. Paper presented at GeoFARMatics2010 International Conference, Köln, Germany.

Vancouver

Ørum JE, Navntoft S. How to minimise direct pesticide load on bees: regional hotspots and the role of MWD systems. 2010. Paper presented at GeoFARMatics2010 International Conference, Köln, Germany.

Author

Ørum, Jens Erik ; Navntoft, Søren . / How to minimise direct pesticide load on bees : regional hotspots and the role of MWD systems. Paper presented at GeoFARMatics2010 International Conference, Köln, Germany.5 p.

Bibtex

@conference{e89185f0012b4de196f732bdebfe5af9,
title = "How to minimise direct pesticide load on bees: regional hotspots and the role of MWD systems",
abstract = "Monitoring, warning and decision support systems (MWD systems) may be profitable solutions to crop protection problems, and at the same time they may reduce the use of pesticides and the pesticide load on human health, non-target organisms and ground water resources. This presentation describes a simple method to pinpoint pesticide problems that causes the highest regional pesticide load (regional hot spots) to various non-target organisms. Finally the potential of MWD systems to reduce the pesticide load in these regional hotspots are discussed with a special focus on bees and other insects. The regional pesticide load is calculated by using the national Danish sales statistic for pesticides in combination with the EU Foot Print database and detailed GIS data for each crop and fields throughout the country. A number of serious hotspots have been identified, in most cases in regions with a high concentration of potatoes, seed grass and sugar beets. MWD systems are available but not profitable, and the present, very detailed restrictions on the application, seems to be a better solution for the bees, than new and improved MWD systems. In the case of other insects and arthropods, however, the load from different pesticides is not systematically registered and also bee related restrictions may be of little help. ",
author = "{\O}rum, {Jens Erik} and S{\o}ren Navntoft",
year = "2010",
month = nov,
day = "26",
language = "English",
note = "null ; Conference date: 24-11-2010 Through 26-11-2010",

}

RIS

TY - CONF

T1 - How to minimise direct pesticide load on bees

AU - Ørum, Jens Erik

AU - Navntoft, Søren

PY - 2010/11/26

Y1 - 2010/11/26

N2 - Monitoring, warning and decision support systems (MWD systems) may be profitable solutions to crop protection problems, and at the same time they may reduce the use of pesticides and the pesticide load on human health, non-target organisms and ground water resources. This presentation describes a simple method to pinpoint pesticide problems that causes the highest regional pesticide load (regional hot spots) to various non-target organisms. Finally the potential of MWD systems to reduce the pesticide load in these regional hotspots are discussed with a special focus on bees and other insects. The regional pesticide load is calculated by using the national Danish sales statistic for pesticides in combination with the EU Foot Print database and detailed GIS data for each crop and fields throughout the country. A number of serious hotspots have been identified, in most cases in regions with a high concentration of potatoes, seed grass and sugar beets. MWD systems are available but not profitable, and the present, very detailed restrictions on the application, seems to be a better solution for the bees, than new and improved MWD systems. In the case of other insects and arthropods, however, the load from different pesticides is not systematically registered and also bee related restrictions may be of little help.

AB - Monitoring, warning and decision support systems (MWD systems) may be profitable solutions to crop protection problems, and at the same time they may reduce the use of pesticides and the pesticide load on human health, non-target organisms and ground water resources. This presentation describes a simple method to pinpoint pesticide problems that causes the highest regional pesticide load (regional hot spots) to various non-target organisms. Finally the potential of MWD systems to reduce the pesticide load in these regional hotspots are discussed with a special focus on bees and other insects. The regional pesticide load is calculated by using the national Danish sales statistic for pesticides in combination with the EU Foot Print database and detailed GIS data for each crop and fields throughout the country. A number of serious hotspots have been identified, in most cases in regions with a high concentration of potatoes, seed grass and sugar beets. MWD systems are available but not profitable, and the present, very detailed restrictions on the application, seems to be a better solution for the bees, than new and improved MWD systems. In the case of other insects and arthropods, however, the load from different pesticides is not systematically registered and also bee related restrictions may be of little help.

M3 - Paper

Y2 - 24 November 2010 through 26 November 2010

ER -

ID: 32930374