Seeing the Forest for the Trees: Managing Social Conflict and Forest Restoration

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Seeing the Forest for the Trees : Managing Social Conflict and Forest Restoration. / Daniels, Steven E.; Emborg, Jens; Walker, Gregg B.

In: Tree and Forestry Science and Biotechnology, Vol. 6, No. (Special Issue 1), 2012.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Daniels, SE, Emborg, J & Walker, GB 2012, 'Seeing the Forest for the Trees: Managing Social Conflict and Forest Restoration', Tree and Forestry Science and Biotechnology, vol. 6, no. (Special Issue 1).

APA

Daniels, S. E., Emborg, J., & Walker, G. B. (2012). Seeing the Forest for the Trees: Managing Social Conflict and Forest Restoration. Tree and Forestry Science and Biotechnology, 6((Special Issue 1)).

Vancouver

Daniels SE, Emborg J, Walker GB. Seeing the Forest for the Trees: Managing Social Conflict and Forest Restoration. Tree and Forestry Science and Biotechnology. 2012;6((Special Issue 1)).

Author

Daniels, Steven E. ; Emborg, Jens ; Walker, Gregg B. / Seeing the Forest for the Trees : Managing Social Conflict and Forest Restoration. In: Tree and Forestry Science and Biotechnology. 2012 ; Vol. 6, No. (Special Issue 1).

Bibtex

@article{f1f9cb718dc9432faf9ca3e5146b1eea,
title = "Seeing the Forest for the Trees: Managing Social Conflict and Forest Restoration",
abstract = "This paper examines the role that social conflict is likely to play in forest restoration projects. A definition of conflict as “perceived goalinterference among interdependent parties” serves as a point of departure for the discussion, and the nature of forest restoration conflict issystematically examined by focusing on each aspect of the definition: perceptions, goal interference, the parties, and their interdependence.Agencies undertaking restoration projects are encouraged to adopt a discourse orientation, wherein they recognize that 1) their publicinvolvement efforts are creating a discourse that can incorporate a wide array of values and voices and 2) groups may create competingdiscourses if they feel that the agency{\textquoteright}s process disenfranchises them.",
author = "Daniels, {Steven E.} and Jens Emborg and Walker, {Gregg B.}",
year = "2012",
language = "English",
volume = "6",
journal = "Tree and Forestry Science and Biotechnology",
issn = "1752-3753",
publisher = "Global Science Books Ltd",
number = "(Special Issue 1)",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Seeing the Forest for the Trees

T2 - Managing Social Conflict and Forest Restoration

AU - Daniels, Steven E.

AU - Emborg, Jens

AU - Walker, Gregg B.

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - This paper examines the role that social conflict is likely to play in forest restoration projects. A definition of conflict as “perceived goalinterference among interdependent parties” serves as a point of departure for the discussion, and the nature of forest restoration conflict issystematically examined by focusing on each aspect of the definition: perceptions, goal interference, the parties, and their interdependence.Agencies undertaking restoration projects are encouraged to adopt a discourse orientation, wherein they recognize that 1) their publicinvolvement efforts are creating a discourse that can incorporate a wide array of values and voices and 2) groups may create competingdiscourses if they feel that the agency’s process disenfranchises them.

AB - This paper examines the role that social conflict is likely to play in forest restoration projects. A definition of conflict as “perceived goalinterference among interdependent parties” serves as a point of departure for the discussion, and the nature of forest restoration conflict issystematically examined by focusing on each aspect of the definition: perceptions, goal interference, the parties, and their interdependence.Agencies undertaking restoration projects are encouraged to adopt a discourse orientation, wherein they recognize that 1) their publicinvolvement efforts are creating a discourse that can incorporate a wide array of values and voices and 2) groups may create competingdiscourses if they feel that the agency’s process disenfranchises them.

M3 - Journal article

VL - 6

JO - Tree and Forestry Science and Biotechnology

JF - Tree and Forestry Science and Biotechnology

SN - 1752-3753

IS - (Special Issue 1)

ER -

ID: 242413485