Danish mink industry: Closure 2020-2021

Research output: Contribution to journalConference articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Danish mink industry: Closure 2020-2021. / Hansen, Henning Otte.

In: Scientifur, Vol. 45, No. 3-4, 2021, p. 75-88.

Research output: Contribution to journalConference articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Hansen, HO 2021, 'Danish mink industry: Closure 2020-2021', Scientifur, vol. 45, no. 3-4, pp. 75-88. <http://www.ifasanet.org/PDF/vol45/Scientifur_45_3.pdf>

APA

Hansen, H. O. (2021). Danish mink industry: Closure 2020-2021. Scientifur, 45(3-4), 75-88. http://www.ifasanet.org/PDF/vol45/Scientifur_45_3.pdf

Vancouver

Hansen HO. Danish mink industry: Closure 2020-2021. Scientifur. 2021;45(3-4):75-88.

Author

Hansen, Henning Otte. / Danish mink industry: Closure 2020-2021. In: Scientifur. 2021 ; Vol. 45, No. 3-4. pp. 75-88.

Bibtex

@inproceedings{aba4d57d15d540abb26bdeaa3ea5f3aa,
title = "Danish mink industry: Closure 2020-2021",
abstract = "With the decision on 4 November 2020 to cull all mink in Denmark, a large industry was de facto closed down for the first time. It was also the first time that public health had had such a major influence on a significant political decision. Public health, and assessments and recommendations of the health authorities were decisive in the decisions.However, because it was the first time this had occurred, it was not possible to draw on past experiences from similar situations. The decision-making process was difficult, and it resulted in a somewhat unstable and messy process: The strategy for combating was changed several times and took place in five different phases. The estimated cost of the closure increased, and the weighing up of the pros and cons was lacking. A very important justification for the culling, the fear of COVID-19 mutations and, thus, the weakening of future vaccines, wasapparently unfounded.The process led to a number of further discussions including the extent of the cullings, the socio-economic costs, the basis for decisions, the valuation of the income losses, and a possible ban on future mink production.",
author = "Hansen, {Henning Otte}",
year = "2021",
language = "English",
volume = "45",
pages = "75--88",
journal = "Scientifur",
issn = "0105-2403",
publisher = "International Fur Animal Scientific Association",
number = "3-4",
note = "International Scientific Congress in Fur Animal Production ; Conference date: 24-08-2021 Through 25-08-2021",

}

RIS

TY - GEN

T1 - Danish mink industry: Closure 2020-2021

AU - Hansen, Henning Otte

N1 - Conference code: XII

PY - 2021

Y1 - 2021

N2 - With the decision on 4 November 2020 to cull all mink in Denmark, a large industry was de facto closed down for the first time. It was also the first time that public health had had such a major influence on a significant political decision. Public health, and assessments and recommendations of the health authorities were decisive in the decisions.However, because it was the first time this had occurred, it was not possible to draw on past experiences from similar situations. The decision-making process was difficult, and it resulted in a somewhat unstable and messy process: The strategy for combating was changed several times and took place in five different phases. The estimated cost of the closure increased, and the weighing up of the pros and cons was lacking. A very important justification for the culling, the fear of COVID-19 mutations and, thus, the weakening of future vaccines, wasapparently unfounded.The process led to a number of further discussions including the extent of the cullings, the socio-economic costs, the basis for decisions, the valuation of the income losses, and a possible ban on future mink production.

AB - With the decision on 4 November 2020 to cull all mink in Denmark, a large industry was de facto closed down for the first time. It was also the first time that public health had had such a major influence on a significant political decision. Public health, and assessments and recommendations of the health authorities were decisive in the decisions.However, because it was the first time this had occurred, it was not possible to draw on past experiences from similar situations. The decision-making process was difficult, and it resulted in a somewhat unstable and messy process: The strategy for combating was changed several times and took place in five different phases. The estimated cost of the closure increased, and the weighing up of the pros and cons was lacking. A very important justification for the culling, the fear of COVID-19 mutations and, thus, the weakening of future vaccines, wasapparently unfounded.The process led to a number of further discussions including the extent of the cullings, the socio-economic costs, the basis for decisions, the valuation of the income losses, and a possible ban on future mink production.

M3 - Conference article

VL - 45

SP - 75

EP - 88

JO - Scientifur

JF - Scientifur

SN - 0105-2403

IS - 3-4

T2 - International Scientific Congress in Fur Animal Production

Y2 - 24 August 2021 through 25 August 2021

ER -

ID: 279834270