Unpacking resource mobilisation by incumbents for biorefineries: the role of micro-level factors for technological innovation system weaknesses

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Unpacking resource mobilisation by incumbents for biorefineries : the role of micro-level factors for technological innovation system weaknesses. / Hansen, Teis; Coenen, Lars.

In: Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, Vol. 29, No. 5, 28.05.2017, p. 500-513.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Hansen, T & Coenen, L 2017, 'Unpacking resource mobilisation by incumbents for biorefineries: the role of micro-level factors for technological innovation system weaknesses', Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 500-513. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2016.1249838

APA

Hansen, T., & Coenen, L. (2017). Unpacking resource mobilisation by incumbents for biorefineries: the role of micro-level factors for technological innovation system weaknesses. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 29(5), 500-513. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2016.1249838

Vancouver

Hansen T, Coenen L. Unpacking resource mobilisation by incumbents for biorefineries: the role of micro-level factors for technological innovation system weaknesses. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management. 2017 May 28;29(5):500-513. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2016.1249838

Author

Hansen, Teis ; Coenen, Lars. / Unpacking resource mobilisation by incumbents for biorefineries : the role of micro-level factors for technological innovation system weaknesses. In: Technology Analysis and Strategic Management. 2017 ; Vol. 29, No. 5. pp. 500-513.

Bibtex

@article{3ad59df98a03460a9bb028fa8e94b85d,
title = "Unpacking resource mobilisation by incumbents for biorefineries: the role of micro-level factors for technological innovation system weaknesses",
abstract = "This paper unpacks resource mobilisation for biorefineries by studying investment decisions of incumbent pulp and paper firms in Sweden and Finland. The analysis highlights that the limited adoption of biorefinery technologies can be attributed to both insufficient abilities (lack of needed competencies and partnerships) and interests (preference for improving existing technologies) by pulp and paper incumbents. Drawing on the technological innovation system perspective complemented with insights from the management literature on the role of incumbents in technological change, four issues are empirically identified as important for improving resource mobilisation for biorefinery technologies: establishing loosely coupled divisions in pulp and paper firms; creating internal markets for new bioproducts aimed at further technological development; entering purchasing agreements with downstream actors; and investing in new managerial competencies.",
keywords = "Biorefineries, incumbents, pulp and paper industry, technological innovation system",
author = "Teis Hansen and Lars Coenen",
year = "2017",
month = may,
day = "28",
doi = "10.1080/09537325.2016.1249838",
language = "English",
volume = "29",
pages = "500--513",
journal = "Technology Analysis and Strategic Management",
issn = "0953-7325",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "5",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Unpacking resource mobilisation by incumbents for biorefineries

T2 - the role of micro-level factors for technological innovation system weaknesses

AU - Hansen, Teis

AU - Coenen, Lars

PY - 2017/5/28

Y1 - 2017/5/28

N2 - This paper unpacks resource mobilisation for biorefineries by studying investment decisions of incumbent pulp and paper firms in Sweden and Finland. The analysis highlights that the limited adoption of biorefinery technologies can be attributed to both insufficient abilities (lack of needed competencies and partnerships) and interests (preference for improving existing technologies) by pulp and paper incumbents. Drawing on the technological innovation system perspective complemented with insights from the management literature on the role of incumbents in technological change, four issues are empirically identified as important for improving resource mobilisation for biorefinery technologies: establishing loosely coupled divisions in pulp and paper firms; creating internal markets for new bioproducts aimed at further technological development; entering purchasing agreements with downstream actors; and investing in new managerial competencies.

AB - This paper unpacks resource mobilisation for biorefineries by studying investment decisions of incumbent pulp and paper firms in Sweden and Finland. The analysis highlights that the limited adoption of biorefinery technologies can be attributed to both insufficient abilities (lack of needed competencies and partnerships) and interests (preference for improving existing technologies) by pulp and paper incumbents. Drawing on the technological innovation system perspective complemented with insights from the management literature on the role of incumbents in technological change, four issues are empirically identified as important for improving resource mobilisation for biorefinery technologies: establishing loosely coupled divisions in pulp and paper firms; creating internal markets for new bioproducts aimed at further technological development; entering purchasing agreements with downstream actors; and investing in new managerial competencies.

KW - Biorefineries

KW - incumbents

KW - pulp and paper industry

KW - technological innovation system

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84994226550&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/09537325.2016.1249838

DO - 10.1080/09537325.2016.1249838

M3 - Journal article

AN - SCOPUS:84994226550

VL - 29

SP - 500

EP - 513

JO - Technology Analysis and Strategic Management

JF - Technology Analysis and Strategic Management

SN - 0953-7325

IS - 5

ER -

ID: 255104413