Empathy as a neuropsychological heuristic in social decision-making

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Empathy as a neuropsychological heuristic in social decision-making. / Ramsøy, Thomas Z.; Skov, Martin; Macoveanu, Julian; Siebner, Hartvig R.; Fosgaard, Toke Reinholt.

I: Social Neuroscience, Bind 10, Nr. 2, 2015, s. 179-191.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Ramsøy, TZ, Skov, M, Macoveanu, J, Siebner, HR & Fosgaard, TR 2015, 'Empathy as a neuropsychological heuristic in social decision-making', Social Neuroscience, bind 10, nr. 2, s. 179-191. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470919.2014.965341

APA

Ramsøy, T. Z., Skov, M., Macoveanu, J., Siebner, H. R., & Fosgaard, T. R. (2015). Empathy as a neuropsychological heuristic in social decision-making. Social Neuroscience, 10(2), 179-191. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470919.2014.965341

Vancouver

Ramsøy TZ, Skov M, Macoveanu J, Siebner HR, Fosgaard TR. Empathy as a neuropsychological heuristic in social decision-making. Social Neuroscience. 2015;10(2):179-191. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470919.2014.965341

Author

Ramsøy, Thomas Z. ; Skov, Martin ; Macoveanu, Julian ; Siebner, Hartvig R. ; Fosgaard, Toke Reinholt. / Empathy as a neuropsychological heuristic in social decision-making. I: Social Neuroscience. 2015 ; Bind 10, Nr. 2. s. 179-191.

Bibtex

@article{c391858546704e4193acc362caf2a76a,
title = "Empathy as a neuropsychological heuristic in social decision-making",
abstract = "Decision-making in social dilemmas is suggested to rely on three factors: the valuation of a choice option, the relative judgment of two or more choice alternatives, and individual factors affecting the ease at which judgments and decisions are made. Here, we test whether empathy—an individual{\textquoteright}s relative ability to understand others{\textquoteright} thoughts, emotions, and intentions—acts as an individual factor that alleviates conflict resolution in social decision-making. We test this by using a framed, iterated prisoners{\textquoteright} dilemma (PD) game in two settings. In a behavioral experiment, we find that individual differences in empathic ability (the Empathy Quotient, EQ) were related to lower response times in the PD game, suggesting that empathy is related to faster social choices, independent of whether they choose to cooperate or defect. In a subsequent neuroimaging experiment, using functional magnetic resonance imaging, we find that EQ is positively related to individual differences in the engagement of brain structures implemented in mentalizing, including the precuneus, superior temporal sulcus, and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. These results suggest that empathy is related to the individual difference in the engagement of mentalizing in social dilemmas and that this is related to the efficiency of decision-making in social dilemmas.",
author = "Rams{\o}y, {Thomas Z.} and Martin Skov and Julian Macoveanu and Siebner, {Hartvig R.} and Fosgaard, {Toke Reinholt}",
note = "Published online 3 Oct 2014",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1080/17470919.2014.965341",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
pages = "179--191",
journal = "Social Neuroscience",
issn = "1747-0919",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Empathy as a neuropsychological heuristic in social decision-making

AU - Ramsøy, Thomas Z.

AU - Skov, Martin

AU - Macoveanu, Julian

AU - Siebner, Hartvig R.

AU - Fosgaard, Toke Reinholt

N1 - Published online 3 Oct 2014

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Decision-making in social dilemmas is suggested to rely on three factors: the valuation of a choice option, the relative judgment of two or more choice alternatives, and individual factors affecting the ease at which judgments and decisions are made. Here, we test whether empathy—an individual’s relative ability to understand others’ thoughts, emotions, and intentions—acts as an individual factor that alleviates conflict resolution in social decision-making. We test this by using a framed, iterated prisoners’ dilemma (PD) game in two settings. In a behavioral experiment, we find that individual differences in empathic ability (the Empathy Quotient, EQ) were related to lower response times in the PD game, suggesting that empathy is related to faster social choices, independent of whether they choose to cooperate or defect. In a subsequent neuroimaging experiment, using functional magnetic resonance imaging, we find that EQ is positively related to individual differences in the engagement of brain structures implemented in mentalizing, including the precuneus, superior temporal sulcus, and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. These results suggest that empathy is related to the individual difference in the engagement of mentalizing in social dilemmas and that this is related to the efficiency of decision-making in social dilemmas.

AB - Decision-making in social dilemmas is suggested to rely on three factors: the valuation of a choice option, the relative judgment of two or more choice alternatives, and individual factors affecting the ease at which judgments and decisions are made. Here, we test whether empathy—an individual’s relative ability to understand others’ thoughts, emotions, and intentions—acts as an individual factor that alleviates conflict resolution in social decision-making. We test this by using a framed, iterated prisoners’ dilemma (PD) game in two settings. In a behavioral experiment, we find that individual differences in empathic ability (the Empathy Quotient, EQ) were related to lower response times in the PD game, suggesting that empathy is related to faster social choices, independent of whether they choose to cooperate or defect. In a subsequent neuroimaging experiment, using functional magnetic resonance imaging, we find that EQ is positively related to individual differences in the engagement of brain structures implemented in mentalizing, including the precuneus, superior temporal sulcus, and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. These results suggest that empathy is related to the individual difference in the engagement of mentalizing in social dilemmas and that this is related to the efficiency of decision-making in social dilemmas.

U2 - 10.1080/17470919.2014.965341

DO - 10.1080/17470919.2014.965341

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 25277964

VL - 10

SP - 179

EP - 191

JO - Social Neuroscience

JF - Social Neuroscience

SN - 1747-0919

IS - 2

ER -

ID: 123834428