Should There Be Wolves in Denmark? An Economic Analysis

Publikation: Bidrag til bog/antologi/rapportBidrag til bog/antologiForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Should There Be Wolves in Denmark? An Economic Analysis. / Jensen, Frank.

Contributions in natural resource economics: Festschrift to Anders Skonhoft. red. / Jon Olaf Olaussen. Bergen : Fagbokforlaget, 2019. s. 136-158.

Publikation: Bidrag til bog/antologi/rapportBidrag til bog/antologiForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Jensen, F 2019, Should There Be Wolves in Denmark? An Economic Analysis. i JO Olaussen (red.), Contributions in natural resource economics: Festschrift to Anders Skonhoft. Fagbokforlaget, Bergen, s. 136-158.

APA

Jensen, F. (2019). Should There Be Wolves in Denmark? An Economic Analysis. I J. O. Olaussen (red.), Contributions in natural resource economics: Festschrift to Anders Skonhoft (s. 136-158). Fagbokforlaget.

Vancouver

Jensen F. Should There Be Wolves in Denmark? An Economic Analysis. I Olaussen JO, red., Contributions in natural resource economics: Festschrift to Anders Skonhoft. Bergen: Fagbokforlaget. 2019. s. 136-158

Author

Jensen, Frank. / Should There Be Wolves in Denmark? An Economic Analysis. Contributions in natural resource economics: Festschrift to Anders Skonhoft. red. / Jon Olaf Olaussen. Bergen : Fagbokforlaget, 2019. s. 136-158

Bibtex

@inbook{c2d8d667420c4ca2bffcae90ec25ef8c,
title = "Should There Be Wolves in Denmark?: An Economic Analysis",
abstract = "After the recent reintroduction of wolves in Denmark a heated public debate among a number of stakeholders arose. In this paper the arguments by these stakeholders is identified and a model for joint management of a wolf and deer population is used to discuss each of the arguments. By using the model we argue that an interior solution with both a positive population and harvest of wolves might be social optimal. This implies that none of the stakeholder´s arguments holds when evaluated separately by a social planner because each represents one out of several benefits and costs arising from a population of wolves. However, each of the arguments can be perfectly rational when evaluated from the point of view of each stakeholder and an incentive to cooperation between stakeholders may exist if these are interested in an approximately identical population of wolves.",
author = "Frank Jensen",
year = "2019",
language = "English",
isbn = "978-82-450-2471-5",
pages = "136--158",
editor = "Olaussen, {Jon Olaf}",
booktitle = "Contributions in natural resource economics",
publisher = "Fagbokforlaget",

}

RIS

TY - CHAP

T1 - Should There Be Wolves in Denmark?

T2 - An Economic Analysis

AU - Jensen, Frank

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - After the recent reintroduction of wolves in Denmark a heated public debate among a number of stakeholders arose. In this paper the arguments by these stakeholders is identified and a model for joint management of a wolf and deer population is used to discuss each of the arguments. By using the model we argue that an interior solution with both a positive population and harvest of wolves might be social optimal. This implies that none of the stakeholder´s arguments holds when evaluated separately by a social planner because each represents one out of several benefits and costs arising from a population of wolves. However, each of the arguments can be perfectly rational when evaluated from the point of view of each stakeholder and an incentive to cooperation between stakeholders may exist if these are interested in an approximately identical population of wolves.

AB - After the recent reintroduction of wolves in Denmark a heated public debate among a number of stakeholders arose. In this paper the arguments by these stakeholders is identified and a model for joint management of a wolf and deer population is used to discuss each of the arguments. By using the model we argue that an interior solution with both a positive population and harvest of wolves might be social optimal. This implies that none of the stakeholder´s arguments holds when evaluated separately by a social planner because each represents one out of several benefits and costs arising from a population of wolves. However, each of the arguments can be perfectly rational when evaluated from the point of view of each stakeholder and an incentive to cooperation between stakeholders may exist if these are interested in an approximately identical population of wolves.

M3 - Book chapter

SN - 978-82-450-2471-5

SP - 136

EP - 158

BT - Contributions in natural resource economics

A2 - Olaussen, Jon Olaf

PB - Fagbokforlaget

CY - Bergen

ER -

ID: 247074332