Social and environmental tensions: affirmative measures under REDD+ carbon payment initiatives in Nepal

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Social and environmental tensions : affirmative measures under REDD+ carbon payment initiatives in Nepal. / Saito, Moeko; Rutt, Rebecca Leigh; Chhetri, Bir Bahadur Khanal.

In: Human Ecology: An Interdisciplinary Journal, Vol. 42, No. 5, 2014, p. 683-694.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Saito, M, Rutt, RL & Chhetri, BBK 2014, 'Social and environmental tensions: affirmative measures under REDD+ carbon payment initiatives in Nepal', Human Ecology: An Interdisciplinary Journal, vol. 42, no. 5, pp. 683-694. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-014-9674-4

APA

Saito, M., Rutt, R. L., & Chhetri, B. B. K. (2014). Social and environmental tensions: affirmative measures under REDD+ carbon payment initiatives in Nepal. Human Ecology: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 42(5), 683-694. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-014-9674-4

Vancouver

Saito M, Rutt RL, Chhetri BBK. Social and environmental tensions: affirmative measures under REDD+ carbon payment initiatives in Nepal. Human Ecology: An Interdisciplinary Journal. 2014;42(5):683-694. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-014-9674-4

Author

Saito, Moeko ; Rutt, Rebecca Leigh ; Chhetri, Bir Bahadur Khanal. / Social and environmental tensions : affirmative measures under REDD+ carbon payment initiatives in Nepal. In: Human Ecology: An Interdisciplinary Journal. 2014 ; Vol. 42, No. 5. pp. 683-694.

Bibtex

@article{88b95b296cc04759a26245c5941e3540,
title = "Social and environmental tensions: affirmative measures under REDD+ carbon payment initiatives in Nepal",
abstract = "REDD + is a mitigation measure against global climate change that offers payments to developing countries based on the increased volume of forest carbon. It has been argued that affirmative measures should be adopted to ensure that communities, particularly the socially disadvantaged groups among them, receive payments not only to address inequities but also for resource conservation. Drawing on a case study of a NORAD pilot project in Nepal, this paper investigates how affirmative measures adopted under the project affect different social actors and their perceptions and behaviors in relation to forests. Our case highlights the risk that the mere application of affirmative measures may give rise to difficult social and environmental tensions. Thus, this paper calls for such measures to effectively incorporate local perspectives in their designs and to be reflective, by allowing for regular monitoring of impacts and modifications of the measures if adverse effects are detected.",
author = "Moeko Saito and Rutt, {Rebecca Leigh} and Chhetri, {Bir Bahadur Khanal}",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1007/s10745-014-9674-4",
language = "English",
volume = "42",
pages = "683--694",
journal = "Human Ecology: An Interdisciplinary Journal",
issn = "0300-7839",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "5",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Social and environmental tensions

T2 - affirmative measures under REDD+ carbon payment initiatives in Nepal

AU - Saito, Moeko

AU - Rutt, Rebecca Leigh

AU - Chhetri, Bir Bahadur Khanal

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - REDD + is a mitigation measure against global climate change that offers payments to developing countries based on the increased volume of forest carbon. It has been argued that affirmative measures should be adopted to ensure that communities, particularly the socially disadvantaged groups among them, receive payments not only to address inequities but also for resource conservation. Drawing on a case study of a NORAD pilot project in Nepal, this paper investigates how affirmative measures adopted under the project affect different social actors and their perceptions and behaviors in relation to forests. Our case highlights the risk that the mere application of affirmative measures may give rise to difficult social and environmental tensions. Thus, this paper calls for such measures to effectively incorporate local perspectives in their designs and to be reflective, by allowing for regular monitoring of impacts and modifications of the measures if adverse effects are detected.

AB - REDD + is a mitigation measure against global climate change that offers payments to developing countries based on the increased volume of forest carbon. It has been argued that affirmative measures should be adopted to ensure that communities, particularly the socially disadvantaged groups among them, receive payments not only to address inequities but also for resource conservation. Drawing on a case study of a NORAD pilot project in Nepal, this paper investigates how affirmative measures adopted under the project affect different social actors and their perceptions and behaviors in relation to forests. Our case highlights the risk that the mere application of affirmative measures may give rise to difficult social and environmental tensions. Thus, this paper calls for such measures to effectively incorporate local perspectives in their designs and to be reflective, by allowing for regular monitoring of impacts and modifications of the measures if adverse effects are detected.

U2 - 10.1007/s10745-014-9674-4

DO - 10.1007/s10745-014-9674-4

M3 - Journal article

VL - 42

SP - 683

EP - 694

JO - Human Ecology: An Interdisciplinary Journal

JF - Human Ecology: An Interdisciplinary Journal

SN - 0300-7839

IS - 5

ER -

ID: 128938043