Three-year randomized controlled clinical study of a one step universal adhesive and a two-step self-etch adhesive in Class II resin composite restorations
Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Standard
Three-year randomized controlled clinical study of a one step universal adhesive and a two-step self-etch adhesive in Class II resin composite restorations. / van Dijken, Jan WV ; Pallesen, Ulla.
I: Journal of Adhesive Dentistry, Bind 19, Nr. 4, 09.2017, s. 287-294.Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Three-year randomized controlled clinical study of a one step universal adhesive and a two-step self-etch adhesive in Class II resin composite restorations
AU - van Dijken, Jan WV
AU - Pallesen, Ulla
PY - 2017/9
Y1 - 2017/9
N2 - Purpose: To evaluate in a randomized clinical evaluation the 3-year clinical durability of a one-step universal adhesive bonding system and compare it intraindividually with a 2-step self-etch adhesive in Class II restorations. Materials and Methods: Each of 57 participants (mean age 58.3 yr) received at least two, as similar as possible, extended Class II restorations. The cavities in each of the 60 individual pairs of cavities were randomly distributed to the 1-step universal adhesive (All Bond Universal: AU) and the control 2-step self-etch adhesive (Optibond XTR: OX). A low shrinkage resin composite (Aelite LS) was used for all restorations which were evaluated using slightly modified USPHS criteria at baseline, 1 and 2 years. Results: 116 Class II restorations were evaluated at two years. Five restorations, 2 AU and 3OX, failed during the follow up, resulting in 96.5% (AU) and 94.8% (OX) success rates (p>0.05). Annual failure rates were 1.8% and 2.6%, respectively.The main reason for failure was resin composite fracture. Conclusion: Class II resin composite restorations placed with a one-step universal adhesive showed good short time effectiveness.
AB - Purpose: To evaluate in a randomized clinical evaluation the 3-year clinical durability of a one-step universal adhesive bonding system and compare it intraindividually with a 2-step self-etch adhesive in Class II restorations. Materials and Methods: Each of 57 participants (mean age 58.3 yr) received at least two, as similar as possible, extended Class II restorations. The cavities in each of the 60 individual pairs of cavities were randomly distributed to the 1-step universal adhesive (All Bond Universal: AU) and the control 2-step self-etch adhesive (Optibond XTR: OX). A low shrinkage resin composite (Aelite LS) was used for all restorations which were evaluated using slightly modified USPHS criteria at baseline, 1 and 2 years. Results: 116 Class II restorations were evaluated at two years. Five restorations, 2 AU and 3OX, failed during the follow up, resulting in 96.5% (AU) and 94.8% (OX) success rates (p>0.05). Annual failure rates were 1.8% and 2.6%, respectively.The main reason for failure was resin composite fracture. Conclusion: Class II resin composite restorations placed with a one-step universal adhesive showed good short time effectiveness.
KW - Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences
KW - adhesive, clinical, posterior, resin composite, self etch, universal
U2 - 10.3290/j.jad.a38867
DO - 10.3290/j.jad.a38867
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 28849796
VL - 19
SP - 287
EP - 294
JO - Journal of Adhesive Dentistry
JF - Journal of Adhesive Dentistry
SN - 1461-5185
IS - 4
ER -
ID: 170141802