Consumer or citizen? Prosocial behaviors in markets and non-markets
Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Standard
Consumer or citizen? Prosocial behaviors in markets and non-markets. / Fosgaard, Mia Reinholt; Fosgaard, Toke Reinholt; Foss, Nicolai Juul.
I: Social Choice and Welfare, Bind 49, Nr. 2, 2017, s. 231–253.Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Consumer or citizen?
T2 - Prosocial behaviors in markets and non-markets
AU - Fosgaard, Mia Reinholt
AU - Fosgaard, Toke Reinholt
AU - Foss, Nicolai Juul
PY - 2017
Y1 - 2017
N2 - While much prosocial behavior has traditionally taken place in non-market contexts, such as families, clans, and social associations, it is in increasingly brought into the market context. For example, companies increasingly promote their products and services by engaging in charitable giving and policy makers increasingly push for the implementation of market-driven prosocial initiatives. However, this trend has occurred without being informed by evidence on how the market influences individuals’ engagement in prosocial behavior. Using a public goods game that simulates a market and a non-market context, we analyze prosocial behavior and its psychological underpinnings across these two contexts. First, we find that prosocial behavior occurs at lower levels in markets than non-markets. Second, we find that individuals’ beliefs about prosocial norms are more important for prosocial behavior in markets than non-markets, while the opposite is true for their autonomous motivation towards prosocial behavior. This suggests that decision-makers need to adjust the means to foster prosocial behavior, depending on the institutional context deemed appropriate for specific prosocial behaviors.
AB - While much prosocial behavior has traditionally taken place in non-market contexts, such as families, clans, and social associations, it is in increasingly brought into the market context. For example, companies increasingly promote their products and services by engaging in charitable giving and policy makers increasingly push for the implementation of market-driven prosocial initiatives. However, this trend has occurred without being informed by evidence on how the market influences individuals’ engagement in prosocial behavior. Using a public goods game that simulates a market and a non-market context, we analyze prosocial behavior and its psychological underpinnings across these two contexts. First, we find that prosocial behavior occurs at lower levels in markets than non-markets. Second, we find that individuals’ beliefs about prosocial norms are more important for prosocial behavior in markets than non-markets, while the opposite is true for their autonomous motivation towards prosocial behavior. This suggests that decision-makers need to adjust the means to foster prosocial behavior, depending on the institutional context deemed appropriate for specific prosocial behaviors.
U2 - 10.1007/s00355-017-1058-4
DO - 10.1007/s00355-017-1058-4
M3 - Journal article
VL - 49
SP - 231
EP - 253
JO - Social Choice and Welfare
JF - Social Choice and Welfare
SN - 0176-1714
IS - 2
ER -
ID: 178488816