The heterogeneous processes of cheating: Attention evidence from two eye tracking experiments
Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Standard
The heterogeneous processes of cheating : Attention evidence from two eye tracking experiments. / Fosgaard, Toke; Jacobsen, Catrine; Street, Chris.
I: Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, Bind 34, Nr. 1, 2021, s. 131-139.Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - The heterogeneous processes of cheating
T2 - Attention evidence from two eye tracking experiments
AU - Fosgaard, Toke
AU - Jacobsen, Catrine
AU - Street, Chris
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - Dishonesty erodes society. Although much is known about dishonesty, the process leading up to the decision of whether to be honest or dishonest is often assumed to be homogenous and is not well understood. In this paper, we take a more nuanced approach and explore more closely the process of deciding whether to cheat or be honest when an opportunity to cheat arises. We do this in two laboratory eye tracking experiments. In our first experiment (n = 193), we identify heterogeneity in the decision to cheat. Some decisions on whether to cheat or be honest exhibit relatively little variation and appear to be oriented towards cheating (or honesty) with apparently little consideration of the alternative, whereas other decisions seem to be characterized by a higher degree of consideration for both decision alternatives. Our second experiment (n = 299) demonstrates that a gaze dependent intervention in the choices process is able to affect the behavioral outcomes.
AB - Dishonesty erodes society. Although much is known about dishonesty, the process leading up to the decision of whether to be honest or dishonest is often assumed to be homogenous and is not well understood. In this paper, we take a more nuanced approach and explore more closely the process of deciding whether to cheat or be honest when an opportunity to cheat arises. We do this in two laboratory eye tracking experiments. In our first experiment (n = 193), we identify heterogeneity in the decision to cheat. Some decisions on whether to cheat or be honest exhibit relatively little variation and appear to be oriented towards cheating (or honesty) with apparently little consideration of the alternative, whereas other decisions seem to be characterized by a higher degree of consideration for both decision alternatives. Our second experiment (n = 299) demonstrates that a gaze dependent intervention in the choices process is able to affect the behavioral outcomes.
KW - dishonesty
KW - drift-diffusion model
KW - eye tracking
KW - heterogeneity
U2 - 10.1002/bdm.2200
DO - 10.1002/bdm.2200
M3 - Journal article
AN - SCOPUS:85087675032
VL - 34
SP - 131
EP - 139
JO - Journal of Behavioral Decision Making
JF - Journal of Behavioral Decision Making
SN - 0894-3257
IS - 1
ER -
ID: 244956971