Understanding heterogeneity of social preferences for fire prevention management

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Understanding heterogeneity of social preferences for fire prevention management. / Varela, Elsa; Jacobsen, Jette Bredahl; Soliño, Mario.

In: Ecological Economics, Vol. 106, 2014, p. 91-104.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Varela, E, Jacobsen, JB & Soliño, M 2014, 'Understanding heterogeneity of social preferences for fire prevention management', Ecological Economics, vol. 106, pp. 91-104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.07.014

APA

Varela, E., Jacobsen, J. B., & Soliño, M. (2014). Understanding heterogeneity of social preferences for fire prevention management. Ecological Economics, 106, 91-104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.07.014

Vancouver

Varela E, Jacobsen JB, Soliño M. Understanding heterogeneity of social preferences for fire prevention management. Ecological Economics. 2014;106:91-104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.07.014

Author

Varela, Elsa ; Jacobsen, Jette Bredahl ; Soliño, Mario. / Understanding heterogeneity of social preferences for fire prevention management. In: Ecological Economics. 2014 ; Vol. 106. pp. 91-104.

Bibtex

@article{27f90348cec14d8aa1efb6eb50752ea0,
title = "Understanding heterogeneity of social preferences for fire prevention management",
abstract = "The forest area burnt annually in the European Mediterranean region has more than doubled since the 1970s. In these forests, the main preventive action consists of forest compartmentalization by fuel break networks, which entail high costs and sometimes significant negative impacts. While many studies look at public preferences for fire suppression, this study analyses the heterogeneity of social preferences for fire prevention. The visual characteristics of fire prevention structures are very familiar to respondents, but their management is unfamiliar, which raises specific attention in terms of analysing preference heterogeneity. A random parameter logit model revealed large heterogeneity and preference for traditional heavy machinery, maintaining linear unshaded fuel breaks at a high density. A latent class model showed that this may be reflected by a third of the population preferring lighter machinery and shaded irregular fuel breaks; a quarter of the population not treating the budget constraint as limiting, another quarter only being worried about the area burnt and the remaining group being against everything. Finally, a discrete mixture model revealed extreme preference patterns for the density of fuel breaks. These results are important for designing fire prevention policies that are efficient and acceptable by the population. ",
author = "Elsa Varela and Jacobsen, {Jette Bredahl} and Mario Soli{\~n}o",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.07.014",
language = "English",
volume = "106",
pages = "91--104",
journal = "Ecological Economics",
issn = "0921-8009",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Understanding heterogeneity of social preferences for fire prevention management

AU - Varela, Elsa

AU - Jacobsen, Jette Bredahl

AU - Soliño, Mario

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - The forest area burnt annually in the European Mediterranean region has more than doubled since the 1970s. In these forests, the main preventive action consists of forest compartmentalization by fuel break networks, which entail high costs and sometimes significant negative impacts. While many studies look at public preferences for fire suppression, this study analyses the heterogeneity of social preferences for fire prevention. The visual characteristics of fire prevention structures are very familiar to respondents, but their management is unfamiliar, which raises specific attention in terms of analysing preference heterogeneity. A random parameter logit model revealed large heterogeneity and preference for traditional heavy machinery, maintaining linear unshaded fuel breaks at a high density. A latent class model showed that this may be reflected by a third of the population preferring lighter machinery and shaded irregular fuel breaks; a quarter of the population not treating the budget constraint as limiting, another quarter only being worried about the area burnt and the remaining group being against everything. Finally, a discrete mixture model revealed extreme preference patterns for the density of fuel breaks. These results are important for designing fire prevention policies that are efficient and acceptable by the population.

AB - The forest area burnt annually in the European Mediterranean region has more than doubled since the 1970s. In these forests, the main preventive action consists of forest compartmentalization by fuel break networks, which entail high costs and sometimes significant negative impacts. While many studies look at public preferences for fire suppression, this study analyses the heterogeneity of social preferences for fire prevention. The visual characteristics of fire prevention structures are very familiar to respondents, but their management is unfamiliar, which raises specific attention in terms of analysing preference heterogeneity. A random parameter logit model revealed large heterogeneity and preference for traditional heavy machinery, maintaining linear unshaded fuel breaks at a high density. A latent class model showed that this may be reflected by a third of the population preferring lighter machinery and shaded irregular fuel breaks; a quarter of the population not treating the budget constraint as limiting, another quarter only being worried about the area burnt and the remaining group being against everything. Finally, a discrete mixture model revealed extreme preference patterns for the density of fuel breaks. These results are important for designing fire prevention policies that are efficient and acceptable by the population.

U2 - 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.07.014

DO - 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.07.014

M3 - Journal article

VL - 106

SP - 91

EP - 104

JO - Ecological Economics

JF - Ecological Economics

SN - 0921-8009

ER -

ID: 128433716