Evaluation of research projects - perspectives for applied research in food and agriculture

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Standard

Evaluation of research projects - perspectives for applied research in food and agriculture. / Pedersen, Søren Marcus; Boesen, Mads Vejlby; Baker, Alister Derek; Larsen, Anders Stig Skau; Pedersen, Jørgen Lindgaard.

In: Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica. Section C. Food Economics, Vol. 8, No. 3, 2011, p. 127-141.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Harvard

Pedersen, SM, Boesen, MV, Baker, AD, Larsen, ASS & Pedersen, JL 2011, 'Evaluation of research projects - perspectives for applied research in food and agriculture', Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica. Section C. Food Economics, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 127-141. https://doi.org/10.1080/16507541.2011.644438

APA

Pedersen, S. M., Boesen, M. V., Baker, A. D., Larsen, A. S. S., & Pedersen, J. L. (2011). Evaluation of research projects - perspectives for applied research in food and agriculture. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica. Section C. Food Economics, 8(3), 127-141. https://doi.org/10.1080/16507541.2011.644438

Vancouver

Pedersen SM, Boesen MV, Baker AD, Larsen ASS, Pedersen JL. Evaluation of research projects - perspectives for applied research in food and agriculture. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica. Section C. Food Economics. 2011;8(3):127-141. https://doi.org/10.1080/16507541.2011.644438

Author

Pedersen, Søren Marcus ; Boesen, Mads Vejlby ; Baker, Alister Derek ; Larsen, Anders Stig Skau ; Pedersen, Jørgen Lindgaard. / Evaluation of research projects - perspectives for applied research in food and agriculture. In: Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica. Section C. Food Economics. 2011 ; Vol. 8, No. 3. pp. 127-141.

Bibtex

@article{26dfc4c83ddc45569a184ba0503d87cf,
title = "Evaluation of research projects - perspectives for applied research in food and agriculture",
abstract = "In this study, the task of evaluating research projects{\textquoteright} relevance and scientific quality is addressed, and a pilot study is executed for five Danish food and agricultural research programmes. Literature reviewed emphasises the importance of context, of consistency and transparency and of the cost of evaluation. Moreover, the purpose of research evaluation is thoroughly examined. The method developed and implemented addresses each of these concerns, particularly by employing simple measures and by complementing quantitative analysis with qualitative exercises featuring structured stakeholder interviews. The results of the pilot indicate substantial variation between projects within programmes, and some evidence of size-performance relationships.",
author = "Pedersen, {S{\o}ren Marcus} and Boesen, {Mads Vejlby} and Baker, {Alister Derek} and Larsen, {Anders Stig Skau} and Pedersen, {J{\o}rgen Lindgaard}",
year = "2011",
doi = "10.1080/16507541.2011.644438",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
pages = "127--141",
journal = "Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica. Section C. Food Economics",
issn = "1650-7541",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of research projects - perspectives for applied research in food and agriculture

AU - Pedersen, Søren Marcus

AU - Boesen, Mads Vejlby

AU - Baker, Alister Derek

AU - Larsen, Anders Stig Skau

AU - Pedersen, Jørgen Lindgaard

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - In this study, the task of evaluating research projects’ relevance and scientific quality is addressed, and a pilot study is executed for five Danish food and agricultural research programmes. Literature reviewed emphasises the importance of context, of consistency and transparency and of the cost of evaluation. Moreover, the purpose of research evaluation is thoroughly examined. The method developed and implemented addresses each of these concerns, particularly by employing simple measures and by complementing quantitative analysis with qualitative exercises featuring structured stakeholder interviews. The results of the pilot indicate substantial variation between projects within programmes, and some evidence of size-performance relationships.

AB - In this study, the task of evaluating research projects’ relevance and scientific quality is addressed, and a pilot study is executed for five Danish food and agricultural research programmes. Literature reviewed emphasises the importance of context, of consistency and transparency and of the cost of evaluation. Moreover, the purpose of research evaluation is thoroughly examined. The method developed and implemented addresses each of these concerns, particularly by employing simple measures and by complementing quantitative analysis with qualitative exercises featuring structured stakeholder interviews. The results of the pilot indicate substantial variation between projects within programmes, and some evidence of size-performance relationships.

U2 - 10.1080/16507541.2011.644438

DO - 10.1080/16507541.2011.644438

M3 - Journal article

VL - 8

SP - 127

EP - 141

JO - Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica. Section C. Food Economics

JF - Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica. Section C. Food Economics

SN - 1650-7541

IS - 3

ER -

ID: 37811962