Forest owners' willingness to accept contracts for ecosystem service provision is sensitive to additionality

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Forest owners' willingness to accept contracts for ecosystem service provision is sensitive to additionality. / Vedel, Suzanne Elizabeth; Jacobsen, Jette Bredahl; Thorsen, Bo Jellesmark.

In: Ecological Economics, Vol. 113, 2015, p. 15-24.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Vedel, SE, Jacobsen, JB & Thorsen, BJ 2015, 'Forest owners' willingness to accept contracts for ecosystem service provision is sensitive to additionality', Ecological Economics, vol. 113, pp. 15-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.02.014

APA

Vedel, S. E., Jacobsen, J. B., & Thorsen, B. J. (2015). Forest owners' willingness to accept contracts for ecosystem service provision is sensitive to additionality. Ecological Economics, 113, 15-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.02.014

Vancouver

Vedel SE, Jacobsen JB, Thorsen BJ. Forest owners' willingness to accept contracts for ecosystem service provision is sensitive to additionality. Ecological Economics. 2015;113:15-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.02.014

Author

Vedel, Suzanne Elizabeth ; Jacobsen, Jette Bredahl ; Thorsen, Bo Jellesmark. / Forest owners' willingness to accept contracts for ecosystem service provision is sensitive to additionality. In: Ecological Economics. 2015 ; Vol. 113. pp. 15-24.

Bibtex

@article{757a2128a4064f6db51bd208be890eeb,
title = "Forest owners' willingness to accept contracts for ecosystem service provision is sensitive to additionality",
abstract = "A key prerequisite to ensure that payment for ecosystem services is effective is that the management measures landowners are paid to undertake are in fact additional to the status quo and hence bring about a change in provision.We investigated Danish forest owners' preferences for conditional contracts for the provision of ecosystem services in Natura 2000 policies in a sample covering 12.5% of the total private forest area. This involves allowing old trees to decay naturally, setting aside forest areas, accepting a fixed percentage of broadleaves and increasing access for the public. Forest owners may already provide some of these, e.g., if they derive private benefits from them, in which case additionality becomes an issue. This study investigates the link between forest owners' current management and their willingness to accept (WTA) payments for providing specific ecosystem services by eliciting current practice prior to a choice experiment on contracts. For most of these ecosystem services, owners differentiate their WTA significantly according to their current management. Owners who did not provide extended access had a mean WTA of €14/ha/year for accepting access up to 15 m from roads and paths and €28/ha/year for accepting access everywhere in their forest. However, forest owners who already allow extended access have a mean WTA around zero.",
keywords = "Payment for environmental services, Biodiversity, Groundwater, Recreational access",
author = "Vedel, {Suzanne Elizabeth} and Jacobsen, {Jette Bredahl} and Thorsen, {Bo Jellesmark}",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.02.014",
language = "English",
volume = "113",
pages = "15--24",
journal = "Ecological Economics",
issn = "0921-8009",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Forest owners' willingness to accept contracts for ecosystem service provision is sensitive to additionality

AU - Vedel, Suzanne Elizabeth

AU - Jacobsen, Jette Bredahl

AU - Thorsen, Bo Jellesmark

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - A key prerequisite to ensure that payment for ecosystem services is effective is that the management measures landowners are paid to undertake are in fact additional to the status quo and hence bring about a change in provision.We investigated Danish forest owners' preferences for conditional contracts for the provision of ecosystem services in Natura 2000 policies in a sample covering 12.5% of the total private forest area. This involves allowing old trees to decay naturally, setting aside forest areas, accepting a fixed percentage of broadleaves and increasing access for the public. Forest owners may already provide some of these, e.g., if they derive private benefits from them, in which case additionality becomes an issue. This study investigates the link between forest owners' current management and their willingness to accept (WTA) payments for providing specific ecosystem services by eliciting current practice prior to a choice experiment on contracts. For most of these ecosystem services, owners differentiate their WTA significantly according to their current management. Owners who did not provide extended access had a mean WTA of €14/ha/year for accepting access up to 15 m from roads and paths and €28/ha/year for accepting access everywhere in their forest. However, forest owners who already allow extended access have a mean WTA around zero.

AB - A key prerequisite to ensure that payment for ecosystem services is effective is that the management measures landowners are paid to undertake are in fact additional to the status quo and hence bring about a change in provision.We investigated Danish forest owners' preferences for conditional contracts for the provision of ecosystem services in Natura 2000 policies in a sample covering 12.5% of the total private forest area. This involves allowing old trees to decay naturally, setting aside forest areas, accepting a fixed percentage of broadleaves and increasing access for the public. Forest owners may already provide some of these, e.g., if they derive private benefits from them, in which case additionality becomes an issue. This study investigates the link between forest owners' current management and their willingness to accept (WTA) payments for providing specific ecosystem services by eliciting current practice prior to a choice experiment on contracts. For most of these ecosystem services, owners differentiate their WTA significantly according to their current management. Owners who did not provide extended access had a mean WTA of €14/ha/year for accepting access up to 15 m from roads and paths and €28/ha/year for accepting access everywhere in their forest. However, forest owners who already allow extended access have a mean WTA around zero.

KW - Payment for environmental services

KW - Biodiversity

KW - Groundwater

KW - Recreational access

U2 - 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.02.014

DO - 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.02.014

M3 - Journal article

VL - 113

SP - 15

EP - 24

JO - Ecological Economics

JF - Ecological Economics

SN - 0921-8009

ER -

ID: 141988409