How can regulation promote efficienct nutrient use in the EU?

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingArticle in proceedingsResearchpeer-review

Standard

How can regulation promote efficienct nutrient use in the EU? / Jacobsen, Brian H.

20th International Farm Management Congress Vol.2: Healthy Agriculture for a Healthy World. 2015. p. 104-112.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingArticle in proceedingsResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Jacobsen, BH 2015, How can regulation promote efficienct nutrient use in the EU? in 20th International Farm Management Congress Vol.2: Healthy Agriculture for a Healthy World. pp. 104-112, 20th International Farm Management Congress, Québec, Canada, 12/07/2015. <http://ifmaonline.org/contents/npr-how-can-regulation-promote-efficient-nutrient-use-in-eu/>

APA

Jacobsen, B. H. (2015). How can regulation promote efficienct nutrient use in the EU? In 20th International Farm Management Congress Vol.2: Healthy Agriculture for a Healthy World (pp. 104-112) http://ifmaonline.org/contents/npr-how-can-regulation-promote-efficient-nutrient-use-in-eu/

Vancouver

Jacobsen BH. How can regulation promote efficienct nutrient use in the EU? In 20th International Farm Management Congress Vol.2: Healthy Agriculture for a Healthy World. 2015. p. 104-112

Author

Jacobsen, Brian H. / How can regulation promote efficienct nutrient use in the EU?. 20th International Farm Management Congress Vol.2: Healthy Agriculture for a Healthy World. 2015. pp. 104-112

Bibtex

@inproceedings{cbd7773a8761427eb11eb5bd3f1b622c,
title = "How can regulation promote efficienct nutrient use in the EU?",
abstract = "The purpose of the INEMAD project is to look at management strategies to improve the utilisation ofnutrients in agriculture in Europe. This paper looks closer at the nutrient policies in selected EUcountries in order to find policies, which has shown to improve nutrient efficiency. High livestockintensity is found in the Flemish region in Belgium, many parts of The Netherlands and parts of France (Britany). The challenges are to combine the interest in high livestock production without having to high environmental impacts. The high livestock intensity has led to higher transport and/or processing costs (Belgium and The Netherlands). The additional costs for West-Flemish farmers can be 10-20 € per ton of excess slurry, which is much higher than the costs required in e.g. Denmark (2-5 € per ton). One would have expected that the high costs would have reduced the livestock density over time in the selected regions, but this has not happened. On the other hand, these regions still struggle to meet the environmental targets as the effect of the regulation takes longer than expected. The policies have been tightened over the years, but it has been difficult to implement measures which are sufficient efficient. Another approach chosen by Denmark has been to use less than economic optimal norms and to require balance between livestock production and area for application of manure. This has been successful in term of environmental impact but has also been rather costly for the farmers. The findings suggest that direct livestock production quotas and voluntary systems have been less efficient.",
author = "Jacobsen, {Brian H.}",
year = "2015",
language = "English",
pages = "104--112",
booktitle = "20th International Farm Management Congress Vol.2",
note = "20th International Farm Management Congress : Healthy Agriculture for a Healthy World, IFMA20 ; Conference date: 12-07-2015 Through 17-07-2015",

}

RIS

TY - GEN

T1 - How can regulation promote efficienct nutrient use in the EU?

AU - Jacobsen, Brian H.

N1 - Conference code: 20

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - The purpose of the INEMAD project is to look at management strategies to improve the utilisation ofnutrients in agriculture in Europe. This paper looks closer at the nutrient policies in selected EUcountries in order to find policies, which has shown to improve nutrient efficiency. High livestockintensity is found in the Flemish region in Belgium, many parts of The Netherlands and parts of France (Britany). The challenges are to combine the interest in high livestock production without having to high environmental impacts. The high livestock intensity has led to higher transport and/or processing costs (Belgium and The Netherlands). The additional costs for West-Flemish farmers can be 10-20 € per ton of excess slurry, which is much higher than the costs required in e.g. Denmark (2-5 € per ton). One would have expected that the high costs would have reduced the livestock density over time in the selected regions, but this has not happened. On the other hand, these regions still struggle to meet the environmental targets as the effect of the regulation takes longer than expected. The policies have been tightened over the years, but it has been difficult to implement measures which are sufficient efficient. Another approach chosen by Denmark has been to use less than economic optimal norms and to require balance between livestock production and area for application of manure. This has been successful in term of environmental impact but has also been rather costly for the farmers. The findings suggest that direct livestock production quotas and voluntary systems have been less efficient.

AB - The purpose of the INEMAD project is to look at management strategies to improve the utilisation ofnutrients in agriculture in Europe. This paper looks closer at the nutrient policies in selected EUcountries in order to find policies, which has shown to improve nutrient efficiency. High livestockintensity is found in the Flemish region in Belgium, many parts of The Netherlands and parts of France (Britany). The challenges are to combine the interest in high livestock production without having to high environmental impacts. The high livestock intensity has led to higher transport and/or processing costs (Belgium and The Netherlands). The additional costs for West-Flemish farmers can be 10-20 € per ton of excess slurry, which is much higher than the costs required in e.g. Denmark (2-5 € per ton). One would have expected that the high costs would have reduced the livestock density over time in the selected regions, but this has not happened. On the other hand, these regions still struggle to meet the environmental targets as the effect of the regulation takes longer than expected. The policies have been tightened over the years, but it has been difficult to implement measures which are sufficient efficient. Another approach chosen by Denmark has been to use less than economic optimal norms and to require balance between livestock production and area for application of manure. This has been successful in term of environmental impact but has also been rather costly for the farmers. The findings suggest that direct livestock production quotas and voluntary systems have been less efficient.

M3 - Article in proceedings

SP - 104

EP - 112

BT - 20th International Farm Management Congress Vol.2

T2 - 20th International Farm Management Congress

Y2 - 12 July 2015 through 17 July 2015

ER -

ID: 162496286