Impact of EU agricultural policy on developing countries: a Uganda case study

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Standard

Impact of EU agricultural policy on developing countries : a Uganda case study. / Boysen, Ole; Jensen, Hans Grinsted; Matthews, Alan.

In: The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, Vol. 25, No. 3, 2016, p. 377-402.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Harvard

Boysen, O, Jensen, HG & Matthews, A 2016, 'Impact of EU agricultural policy on developing countries: a Uganda case study', The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 377-402. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638199.2015.1069884

APA

Boysen, O., Jensen, H. G., & Matthews, A. (2016). Impact of EU agricultural policy on developing countries: a Uganda case study. The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, 25(3), 377-402. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638199.2015.1069884

Vancouver

Boysen O, Jensen HG, Matthews A. Impact of EU agricultural policy on developing countries: a Uganda case study. The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development. 2016;25(3):377-402. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638199.2015.1069884

Author

Boysen, Ole ; Jensen, Hans Grinsted ; Matthews, Alan. / Impact of EU agricultural policy on developing countries : a Uganda case study. In: The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development. 2016 ; Vol. 25, No. 3. pp. 377-402.

Bibtex

@article{8c64224947d942d9ae3ac925862d7bb5,
title = "Impact of EU agricultural policy on developing countries: a Uganda case study",
abstract = "Despite substantial reforms, the EU{\textquoteright}s Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) is still criticised for its detrimental effects on developing countries. This paper provides updated evidence on the impact of the CAP on one developing country, Uganda. It goes beyond estimating macro-level economic effects by analysing the impacts on poverty. The policy simulation results show that eliminating EU agricultural support would have marginal but nonetheless positive impacts on the Ugandan economy and its poverty indicators. From the perspective of the EU{\textquoteright}s commitment to policy coherence for development, this supports the view that further reducing EU Agricultural support would be positive for development.",
author = "Ole Boysen and Jensen, {Hans Grinsted} and Alan Matthews",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1080/09638199.2015.1069884",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "377--402",
journal = "Journal of International Trade and Economic Development",
issn = "0963-8199",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis Online",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Impact of EU agricultural policy on developing countries

T2 - a Uganda case study

AU - Boysen, Ole

AU - Jensen, Hans Grinsted

AU - Matthews, Alan

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Despite substantial reforms, the EU’s Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) is still criticised for its detrimental effects on developing countries. This paper provides updated evidence on the impact of the CAP on one developing country, Uganda. It goes beyond estimating macro-level economic effects by analysing the impacts on poverty. The policy simulation results show that eliminating EU agricultural support would have marginal but nonetheless positive impacts on the Ugandan economy and its poverty indicators. From the perspective of the EU’s commitment to policy coherence for development, this supports the view that further reducing EU Agricultural support would be positive for development.

AB - Despite substantial reforms, the EU’s Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) is still criticised for its detrimental effects on developing countries. This paper provides updated evidence on the impact of the CAP on one developing country, Uganda. It goes beyond estimating macro-level economic effects by analysing the impacts on poverty. The policy simulation results show that eliminating EU agricultural support would have marginal but nonetheless positive impacts on the Ugandan economy and its poverty indicators. From the perspective of the EU’s commitment to policy coherence for development, this supports the view that further reducing EU Agricultural support would be positive for development.

U2 - 10.1080/09638199.2015.1069884

DO - 10.1080/09638199.2015.1069884

M3 - Journal article

VL - 25

SP - 377

EP - 402

JO - Journal of International Trade and Economic Development

JF - Journal of International Trade and Economic Development

SN - 0963-8199

IS - 3

ER -

ID: 144115354