Implementation of participatory forest management in Kenya: a case study of Karima Forest

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Implementation of participatory forest management in Kenya : a case study of Karima Forest. / Løber, T.; Skensved, E.M.; Hansen, Christian Pilegaard; Thygesen, S.H.

In: International Forestry Review, Vol. 18, No. 3, 2016, p. 357-368.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Løber, T, Skensved, EM, Hansen, CP & Thygesen, SH 2016, 'Implementation of participatory forest management in Kenya: a case study of Karima Forest', International Forestry Review, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 357-368. https://doi.org/10.1505/146554816819501673

APA

Løber, T., Skensved, E. M., Hansen, C. P., & Thygesen, S. H. (2016). Implementation of participatory forest management in Kenya: a case study of Karima Forest. International Forestry Review, 18(3), 357-368. https://doi.org/10.1505/146554816819501673

Vancouver

Løber T, Skensved EM, Hansen CP, Thygesen SH. Implementation of participatory forest management in Kenya: a case study of Karima Forest. International Forestry Review. 2016;18(3):357-368. https://doi.org/10.1505/146554816819501673

Author

Løber, T. ; Skensved, E.M. ; Hansen, Christian Pilegaard ; Thygesen, S.H. / Implementation of participatory forest management in Kenya : a case study of Karima Forest. In: International Forestry Review. 2016 ; Vol. 18, No. 3. pp. 357-368.

Bibtex

@article{f4eac4f806f54993960ae306208aa94a,
title = "Implementation of participatory forest management in Kenya: a case study of Karima Forest",
abstract = "This paper analyzes the distribution of powers before and after the implementation of participatory forest management (PFM) in Kenya. The paper is a case study of the Karima forest in the Central Highlands of Kenya. The study relies primarily on 34 semi-structured interviews with key actors involved in and affected by the PFM. The paper finds that the established Community Forest Association (CFA) has not been entrusted with significant powers; all powers and benefits remain with the local authority (county government). Moreover, the paper documents that the CFA offers a poor representation of the forest communities and weak downward accountability relations. Finally, it illustrates a planning process, which has weaknesses in participation and inclusiveness. Consequently, the paper suggests three areas for PFM policy reform in Kenya: (i) the role (powers) and function of CFAs; (ii) benefit sharing; and (iii) ways to make the PFM process more participatory and inclusive.",
keywords = "accountability, benefit sharing, Democratic decentralization, rights",
author = "T. L{\o}ber and E.M. Skensved and Hansen, {Christian Pilegaard} and S.H. Thygesen",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1505/146554816819501673",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "357--368",
journal = "International Forestry Review",
issn = "1465-5489",
publisher = "Commonwealth Forestry Associaion",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Implementation of participatory forest management in Kenya

T2 - a case study of Karima Forest

AU - Løber, T.

AU - Skensved, E.M.

AU - Hansen, Christian Pilegaard

AU - Thygesen, S.H.

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - This paper analyzes the distribution of powers before and after the implementation of participatory forest management (PFM) in Kenya. The paper is a case study of the Karima forest in the Central Highlands of Kenya. The study relies primarily on 34 semi-structured interviews with key actors involved in and affected by the PFM. The paper finds that the established Community Forest Association (CFA) has not been entrusted with significant powers; all powers and benefits remain with the local authority (county government). Moreover, the paper documents that the CFA offers a poor representation of the forest communities and weak downward accountability relations. Finally, it illustrates a planning process, which has weaknesses in participation and inclusiveness. Consequently, the paper suggests three areas for PFM policy reform in Kenya: (i) the role (powers) and function of CFAs; (ii) benefit sharing; and (iii) ways to make the PFM process more participatory and inclusive.

AB - This paper analyzes the distribution of powers before and after the implementation of participatory forest management (PFM) in Kenya. The paper is a case study of the Karima forest in the Central Highlands of Kenya. The study relies primarily on 34 semi-structured interviews with key actors involved in and affected by the PFM. The paper finds that the established Community Forest Association (CFA) has not been entrusted with significant powers; all powers and benefits remain with the local authority (county government). Moreover, the paper documents that the CFA offers a poor representation of the forest communities and weak downward accountability relations. Finally, it illustrates a planning process, which has weaknesses in participation and inclusiveness. Consequently, the paper suggests three areas for PFM policy reform in Kenya: (i) the role (powers) and function of CFAs; (ii) benefit sharing; and (iii) ways to make the PFM process more participatory and inclusive.

KW - accountability

KW - benefit sharing

KW - Democratic decentralization

KW - rights

U2 - 10.1505/146554816819501673

DO - 10.1505/146554816819501673

M3 - Journal article

AN - SCOPUS:84986268104

VL - 18

SP - 357

EP - 368

JO - International Forestry Review

JF - International Forestry Review

SN - 1465-5489

IS - 3

ER -

ID: 177413724