Investigating farmers’ preferences for alternative PES schemes to promote carbon sequestration in UK agroecosystems

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Standard

Investigating farmers’ preferences for alternative PES schemes to promote carbon sequestration in UK agroecosystems. / Aslam, Uzma; Termansen, Mette; Fleskens, Luuk.

In: Ecosystem Services, Vol. 27 Part A, 10.2017, p. 103-112.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Harvard

Aslam, U, Termansen, M & Fleskens, L 2017, 'Investigating farmers’ preferences for alternative PES schemes to promote carbon sequestration in UK agroecosystems', Ecosystem Services, vol. 27 Part A, pp. 103-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.08.004

APA

Aslam, U., Termansen, M., & Fleskens, L. (2017). Investigating farmers’ preferences for alternative PES schemes to promote carbon sequestration in UK agroecosystems. Ecosystem Services, 27 Part A, 103-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.08.004

Vancouver

Aslam U, Termansen M, Fleskens L. Investigating farmers’ preferences for alternative PES schemes to promote carbon sequestration in UK agroecosystems. Ecosystem Services. 2017 Oct;27 Part A:103-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.08.004

Author

Aslam, Uzma ; Termansen, Mette ; Fleskens, Luuk. / Investigating farmers’ preferences for alternative PES schemes to promote carbon sequestration in UK agroecosystems. In: Ecosystem Services. 2017 ; Vol. 27 Part A. pp. 103-112.

Bibtex

@article{2dc0e6f2ac44450f9d343f7277d1475d,
title = "Investigating farmers{\textquoteright} preferences for alternative PES schemes to promote carbon sequestration in UK agroecosystems",
abstract = "Payment for Ecosystem Services (PES) approaches can potentially be used to protect and enhance the provision of ecosystem services. However, there is a need to assess the costs and effectiveness of such voluntary schemes. In particular there is a need for PES schemes to enhance climate regulating services in agricultural systems. In this paper we combine a choice experiment with a marginal abatement cost approach to determine the heterogeneity in cost-effectiveness of sequestration policy schemes in the UK farming sector. The results in general suggest that farmers show an aversion to drastic changes in land management activities but they can be encouraged to adopt relatively less restrictive activities through appropriate compensations. The results indicate that agricultural schemes can deliver carbon abatement at costs comparable to the official UK carbon price. This suggests that carbon sequestration in soils through land use changes and alternative land use management should be considered in UK policy developments to achieve carbon mitigation targets.",
author = "Uzma Aslam and Mette Termansen and Luuk Fleskens",
year = "2017",
month = oct,
doi = "10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.08.004",
language = "English",
volume = "27 Part A",
pages = "103--112",
journal = "Ecosystem Services",
issn = "2212-0416",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Investigating farmers’ preferences for alternative PES schemes to promote carbon sequestration in UK agroecosystems

AU - Aslam, Uzma

AU - Termansen, Mette

AU - Fleskens, Luuk

PY - 2017/10

Y1 - 2017/10

N2 - Payment for Ecosystem Services (PES) approaches can potentially be used to protect and enhance the provision of ecosystem services. However, there is a need to assess the costs and effectiveness of such voluntary schemes. In particular there is a need for PES schemes to enhance climate regulating services in agricultural systems. In this paper we combine a choice experiment with a marginal abatement cost approach to determine the heterogeneity in cost-effectiveness of sequestration policy schemes in the UK farming sector. The results in general suggest that farmers show an aversion to drastic changes in land management activities but they can be encouraged to adopt relatively less restrictive activities through appropriate compensations. The results indicate that agricultural schemes can deliver carbon abatement at costs comparable to the official UK carbon price. This suggests that carbon sequestration in soils through land use changes and alternative land use management should be considered in UK policy developments to achieve carbon mitigation targets.

AB - Payment for Ecosystem Services (PES) approaches can potentially be used to protect and enhance the provision of ecosystem services. However, there is a need to assess the costs and effectiveness of such voluntary schemes. In particular there is a need for PES schemes to enhance climate regulating services in agricultural systems. In this paper we combine a choice experiment with a marginal abatement cost approach to determine the heterogeneity in cost-effectiveness of sequestration policy schemes in the UK farming sector. The results in general suggest that farmers show an aversion to drastic changes in land management activities but they can be encouraged to adopt relatively less restrictive activities through appropriate compensations. The results indicate that agricultural schemes can deliver carbon abatement at costs comparable to the official UK carbon price. This suggests that carbon sequestration in soils through land use changes and alternative land use management should be considered in UK policy developments to achieve carbon mitigation targets.

U2 - 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.08.004

DO - 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.08.004

M3 - Journal article

VL - 27 Part A

SP - 103

EP - 112

JO - Ecosystem Services

JF - Ecosystem Services

SN - 2212-0416

ER -

ID: 188784153