Networking Our Way to Better Ecosystem Service Provision

Department of Food and Resource Economics (IFRO)

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Standard

Networking Our Way to Better Ecosystem Service Provision. / Consortium, QUINTESSENCE; Termansen, Mette.

In: Trends in Ecology & Evolution, Vol. 31, No. 2, 02.2016, p. 105-115.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Harvard

Consortium, QUINTESSENCE & Termansen, M 2016, 'Networking Our Way to Better Ecosystem Service Provision', Trends in Ecology & Evolution, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 105-115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2015.12.003

APA

Consortium, QUINTESSENCE., & Termansen, M. (2016). Networking Our Way to Better Ecosystem Service Provision. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 31(2), 105-115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2015.12.003

Vancouver

Consortium QUINTESSENCE, Termansen M. Networking Our Way to Better Ecosystem Service Provision. Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 2016 Feb;31(2):105-115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2015.12.003

Author

Consortium, QUINTESSENCE ; Termansen, Mette. / Networking Our Way to Better Ecosystem Service Provision. In: Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 2016 ; Vol. 31, No. 2. pp. 105-115.

Bibtex

@article{bdfc19b7e1944c5a9847001dc2669576,

title = "Networking Our Way to Better Ecosystem Service Provision",

abstract = "The ecosystem services (EcoS) concept is being used increasingly to attach values to natural systems and the multiple benefits they provide to human societies. Ecosystem processes or functions only become EcoS if they are shown to have social and/or economic value. This should assure an explicit connection between the natural and social sciences, but EcoS approaches have been criticized for retaining little natural science. Preserving the natural, ecological science context within EcoS research is challenging because the multiple disciplines involved have very different traditions and vocabularies (common-language challenge) and span many organizational levels and temporal and spatial scales (scale challenge) that define the relevant interacting entities (interaction challenge). We propose a network-based approach to transcend these discipline challenges and place the natural science context at the heart of EcoS research.",

author = "QUINTESSENCE Consortium and Mette Termansen",

year = "2016",

month = feb,

doi = "10.1016/j.tree.2015.12.003",

language = "English",

volume = "31",

pages = "105--115",

journal = "Trends in Ecology & Evolution",

issn = "0169-5347",

publisher = "Elsevier Ltd. * Trends Journals",

number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Networking Our Way to Better Ecosystem Service Provision

AU - Consortium, QUINTESSENCE

AU - Termansen, Mette

PY - 2016/2

Y1 - 2016/2

N2 - The ecosystem services (EcoS) concept is being used increasingly to attach values to natural systems and the multiple benefits they provide to human societies. Ecosystem processes or functions only become EcoS if they are shown to have social and/or economic value. This should assure an explicit connection between the natural and social sciences, but EcoS approaches have been criticized for retaining little natural science. Preserving the natural, ecological science context within EcoS research is challenging because the multiple disciplines involved have very different traditions and vocabularies (common-language challenge) and span many organizational levels and temporal and spatial scales (scale challenge) that define the relevant interacting entities (interaction challenge). We propose a network-based approach to transcend these discipline challenges and place the natural science context at the heart of EcoS research.

AB - The ecosystem services (EcoS) concept is being used increasingly to attach values to natural systems and the multiple benefits they provide to human societies. Ecosystem processes or functions only become EcoS if they are shown to have social and/or economic value. This should assure an explicit connection between the natural and social sciences, but EcoS approaches have been criticized for retaining little natural science. Preserving the natural, ecological science context within EcoS research is challenging because the multiple disciplines involved have very different traditions and vocabularies (common-language challenge) and span many organizational levels and temporal and spatial scales (scale challenge) that define the relevant interacting entities (interaction challenge). We propose a network-based approach to transcend these discipline challenges and place the natural science context at the heart of EcoS research.

U2 - 10.1016/j.tree.2015.12.003

DO - 10.1016/j.tree.2015.12.003

M3 - Journal article

VL - 31

SP - 105

EP - 115

JO - Trends in Ecology & Evolution

JF - Trends in Ecology & Evolution

SN - 0169-5347

IS - 2

ER -

ID: 189671563