Ranking alternatives based on imprecise multi-criteria data and pairwise overlap dominance relations

Research output: Working paperResearch

Standard

Ranking alternatives based on imprecise multi-criteria data and pairwise overlap dominance relations. / Franco de los Rios, Camilo Andres; Hougaard, Jens Leth; Nielsen, Kurt.

Department of Food and Resource Economics, University of Copenhagen, 2014.

Research output: Working paperResearch

Harvard

Franco de los Rios, CA, Hougaard, JL & Nielsen, K 2014 'Ranking alternatives based on imprecise multi-criteria data and pairwise overlap dominance relations' Department of Food and Resource Economics, University of Copenhagen. <http://econpapers.repec.org/RePEc:foi:msapwp:02_2014>

APA

Franco de los Rios, C. A., Hougaard, J. L., & Nielsen, K. (2014). Ranking alternatives based on imprecise multi-criteria data and pairwise overlap dominance relations. Department of Food and Resource Economics, University of Copenhagen. MSAP Working Paper Series No. 02/2014 http://econpapers.repec.org/RePEc:foi:msapwp:02_2014

Vancouver

Franco de los Rios CA, Hougaard JL, Nielsen K. Ranking alternatives based on imprecise multi-criteria data and pairwise overlap dominance relations. Department of Food and Resource Economics, University of Copenhagen. 2014.

Author

Franco de los Rios, Camilo Andres ; Hougaard, Jens Leth ; Nielsen, Kurt. / Ranking alternatives based on imprecise multi-criteria data and pairwise overlap dominance relations. Department of Food and Resource Economics, University of Copenhagen, 2014. (MSAP Working Paper Series; No. 02/2014).

Bibtex

@techreport{33e69c71416c430fb328dfc53195d847,
title = "Ranking alternatives based on imprecise multi-criteria data and pairwise overlap dominance relations",
abstract = "This paper explores a multi-criteria outranking methodology that is designed to both handle uncertain and imprecise data in describing alternatives as well as treating the decision maker's preference information in a sensible way that re flects the difficulties in articulating preferences. Based on fuzzy interval degrees, representing and measuring data imprecision, this procedure obtains a set of semi-equivalence classes assigning an intransitive order on the alternatives. Relevance measures are then explored for ranking alternatives with respect to the semi-equivalence classes, and a final illustrative example is given for comparison with standard methods like PROMETHEE. The proposed methodology takes into account the risk attitudes of decision makers, organizing the alternatives and ranking them according to their relevance. The whole interactive decision support allows understanding the dependencies among the alternatives and how they can be resolved if a finer ranking is preferred. ",
author = "{Franco de los Rios}, {Camilo Andres} and Hougaard, {Jens Leth} and Kurt Nielsen",
year = "2014",
language = "English",
series = "MSAP Working Paper Series",
publisher = "Department of Food and Resource Economics, University of Copenhagen",
number = "02/2014",
type = "WorkingPaper",
institution = "Department of Food and Resource Economics, University of Copenhagen",

}

RIS

TY - UNPB

T1 - Ranking alternatives based on imprecise multi-criteria data and pairwise overlap dominance relations

AU - Franco de los Rios, Camilo Andres

AU - Hougaard, Jens Leth

AU - Nielsen, Kurt

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - This paper explores a multi-criteria outranking methodology that is designed to both handle uncertain and imprecise data in describing alternatives as well as treating the decision maker's preference information in a sensible way that re flects the difficulties in articulating preferences. Based on fuzzy interval degrees, representing and measuring data imprecision, this procedure obtains a set of semi-equivalence classes assigning an intransitive order on the alternatives. Relevance measures are then explored for ranking alternatives with respect to the semi-equivalence classes, and a final illustrative example is given for comparison with standard methods like PROMETHEE. The proposed methodology takes into account the risk attitudes of decision makers, organizing the alternatives and ranking them according to their relevance. The whole interactive decision support allows understanding the dependencies among the alternatives and how they can be resolved if a finer ranking is preferred.

AB - This paper explores a multi-criteria outranking methodology that is designed to both handle uncertain and imprecise data in describing alternatives as well as treating the decision maker's preference information in a sensible way that re flects the difficulties in articulating preferences. Based on fuzzy interval degrees, representing and measuring data imprecision, this procedure obtains a set of semi-equivalence classes assigning an intransitive order on the alternatives. Relevance measures are then explored for ranking alternatives with respect to the semi-equivalence classes, and a final illustrative example is given for comparison with standard methods like PROMETHEE. The proposed methodology takes into account the risk attitudes of decision makers, organizing the alternatives and ranking them according to their relevance. The whole interactive decision support allows understanding the dependencies among the alternatives and how they can be resolved if a finer ranking is preferred.

M3 - Working paper

T3 - MSAP Working Paper Series

BT - Ranking alternatives based on imprecise multi-criteria data and pairwise overlap dominance relations

PB - Department of Food and Resource Economics, University of Copenhagen

ER -

ID: 123832019