Regulation of Location-Specific Externalities

Research output: Working paperResearch

Standard

Regulation of Location-Specific Externalities. / Amundsen, Eirik S; Hansen, Lars Gårn; Whitta-Jacobsen, Hans Jørgen.

2018.

Research output: Working paperResearch

Harvard

Amundsen, ES, Hansen, LG & Whitta-Jacobsen, HJ 2018 'Regulation of Location-Specific Externalities'. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3284528

APA

Amundsen, E. S., Hansen, L. G., & Whitta-Jacobsen, H. J. (2018). Regulation of Location-Specific Externalities. University of Copenhagen. Institute of Economics. Discussion Papers (Online) No. 18-11 https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3284528

Vancouver

Amundsen ES, Hansen LG, Whitta-Jacobsen HJ. Regulation of Location-Specific Externalities. 2018 Dec 9. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3284528

Author

Amundsen, Eirik S ; Hansen, Lars Gårn ; Whitta-Jacobsen, Hans Jørgen. / Regulation of Location-Specific Externalities. 2018. (University of Copenhagen. Institute of Economics. Discussion Papers (Online); No. 18-11).

Bibtex

@techreport{e4c062b4cd1f47b6a2108aa0437f4aaf,
title = "Regulation of Location-Specific Externalities",
abstract = "In this paper, we study regulation of externalities involving many small-scale polluters, where the damages from emissions depend on the polluters{\textquoteright} locations. Examples include nutrient and pesticide emissions from farms, particulate emissions from vehicles and home heating units, emissions of hazardous chemical compounds from small business etc. With such emission problems, regulatory authorities often apply a combination of firm-level, possibly differentiated standards for {\textquoteleft}cleaner{\textquoteright} technologies, and market-level, undifferentiated dirty input regulations. We establish general principles for how such regulations should be designed and combined. We find that the optimal regulation design crucially depends on the type of cleaner technologies available to polluters. If these are {\textquoteleft}emission capturing{\textquoteright}, optimal technology standards encourage the use of cleaner technologies in both high and low damage areas, while if they are {\textquoteleft}input displacing{\textquoteright}, optimal technology regulation encourages cleaner technologies in high damage areas, but discourages their use in low damage areas. Regulation should always discourage the use of dirty input and the optimal regulation intensity may be substantial, particularly if the available cleaner technologies are input displacing.",
keywords = "Location-Specific Externalities, Clean Technologies, Regulation, Policy",
author = "Amundsen, {Eirik S} and Hansen, {Lars G{\aa}rn} and Whitta-Jacobsen, {Hans J{\o}rgen}",
year = "2018",
month = dec,
day = "9",
doi = "10.2139/ssrn.3284528",
language = "English",
series = "University of Copenhagen. Institute of Economics. Discussion Papers (Online)",
number = "18-11",
type = "WorkingPaper",

}

RIS

TY - UNPB

T1 - Regulation of Location-Specific Externalities

AU - Amundsen, Eirik S

AU - Hansen, Lars Gårn

AU - Whitta-Jacobsen, Hans Jørgen

PY - 2018/12/9

Y1 - 2018/12/9

N2 - In this paper, we study regulation of externalities involving many small-scale polluters, where the damages from emissions depend on the polluters’ locations. Examples include nutrient and pesticide emissions from farms, particulate emissions from vehicles and home heating units, emissions of hazardous chemical compounds from small business etc. With such emission problems, regulatory authorities often apply a combination of firm-level, possibly differentiated standards for ‘cleaner’ technologies, and market-level, undifferentiated dirty input regulations. We establish general principles for how such regulations should be designed and combined. We find that the optimal regulation design crucially depends on the type of cleaner technologies available to polluters. If these are ‘emission capturing’, optimal technology standards encourage the use of cleaner technologies in both high and low damage areas, while if they are ‘input displacing’, optimal technology regulation encourages cleaner technologies in high damage areas, but discourages their use in low damage areas. Regulation should always discourage the use of dirty input and the optimal regulation intensity may be substantial, particularly if the available cleaner technologies are input displacing.

AB - In this paper, we study regulation of externalities involving many small-scale polluters, where the damages from emissions depend on the polluters’ locations. Examples include nutrient and pesticide emissions from farms, particulate emissions from vehicles and home heating units, emissions of hazardous chemical compounds from small business etc. With such emission problems, regulatory authorities often apply a combination of firm-level, possibly differentiated standards for ‘cleaner’ technologies, and market-level, undifferentiated dirty input regulations. We establish general principles for how such regulations should be designed and combined. We find that the optimal regulation design crucially depends on the type of cleaner technologies available to polluters. If these are ‘emission capturing’, optimal technology standards encourage the use of cleaner technologies in both high and low damage areas, while if they are ‘input displacing’, optimal technology regulation encourages cleaner technologies in high damage areas, but discourages their use in low damage areas. Regulation should always discourage the use of dirty input and the optimal regulation intensity may be substantial, particularly if the available cleaner technologies are input displacing.

KW - Location-Specific Externalities

KW - Clean Technologies

KW - Regulation

KW - Policy

U2 - 10.2139/ssrn.3284528

DO - 10.2139/ssrn.3284528

M3 - Working paper

T3 - University of Copenhagen. Institute of Economics. Discussion Papers (Online)

BT - Regulation of Location-Specific Externalities

ER -

ID: 248645947