What role for government? The promotion of civil society through forestry-related climate change interventions in post-conflict Nepal
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Standard
What role for government? The promotion of civil society through forestry-related climate change interventions in post-conflict Nepal. / Rutt, Rebecca Leigh; Lund, Jens Friis.
In: Public Administration and Development, Vol. 34, No. 5, 2014, p. 406-421.Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - What role for government? The promotion of civil society through forestry-related climate change interventions in post-conflict Nepal
AU - Rutt, Rebecca Leigh
AU - Lund, Jens Friis
PY - 2014
Y1 - 2014
N2 - This study examines rationales behind the choice of local interlocutors by forestry-related climate change projects in post-conflict Nepal. In their stated objectives, all projects claim to involve the government, and most project decision makers are in favor of government involvement, yet project resources overwhelmingly favor civil society institutions. Project decision makers’ choices are shaped by a combination of donor conditionalities, contextual constraints, and beliefs about which institutional attributes matter and how to address historical marginalization. The projects’ empowerment of civil society sidesteps opportunities to strengthen the local government, which is described as weak, disinterested, and lacking legitimacy owing to the absence of elections due to the unsettled post-conflict situation. Through the choices made and their justifications, projects and donors further marginalize the local government materially and discursively and thereby entrench its perceived deficiencies. We argue that this privileging of civil society may have implications for government legitimacy and post-conflict reconstruction and call for donors and the intervening institutions they fund to critically and collectively reassess the role of forestry-related climate change projects in the larger process of post-conflict reconstruction in Nepal.
AB - This study examines rationales behind the choice of local interlocutors by forestry-related climate change projects in post-conflict Nepal. In their stated objectives, all projects claim to involve the government, and most project decision makers are in favor of government involvement, yet project resources overwhelmingly favor civil society institutions. Project decision makers’ choices are shaped by a combination of donor conditionalities, contextual constraints, and beliefs about which institutional attributes matter and how to address historical marginalization. The projects’ empowerment of civil society sidesteps opportunities to strengthen the local government, which is described as weak, disinterested, and lacking legitimacy owing to the absence of elections due to the unsettled post-conflict situation. Through the choices made and their justifications, projects and donors further marginalize the local government materially and discursively and thereby entrench its perceived deficiencies. We argue that this privileging of civil society may have implications for government legitimacy and post-conflict reconstruction and call for donors and the intervening institutions they fund to critically and collectively reassess the role of forestry-related climate change projects in the larger process of post-conflict reconstruction in Nepal.
U2 - 10.1002/pad.1699
DO - 10.1002/pad.1699
M3 - Journal article
VL - 34
SP - 406
EP - 421
JO - Public Administration and Development
JF - Public Administration and Development
SN - 0271-2075
IS - 5
ER -
ID: 128937764