Breeding for behavioural change in farm animails: practical and ethical considerations

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference abstract in proceedingsResearch

Standard

Breeding for behavioural change in farm animails : practical and ethical considerations. / Sandøe, Peter; D'eath, RB; Lawrence, AB; Conington, J; Olsson, IAS.

Darwinian selection, selective breeding and the welfare of animals. UFAW International Symposium 2009: Wheathampstead. 2009.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference abstract in proceedingsResearch

Harvard

Sandøe, P, D'eath, RB, Lawrence, AB, Conington, J & Olsson, IAS 2009, Breeding for behavioural change in farm animails: practical and ethical considerations. in Darwinian selection, selective breeding and the welfare of animals. UFAW International Symposium 2009: Wheathampstead. Darwinian selection, selective breedin and the welfare of animals. UFAW Internatinal Symposium 2009, Bristol, United Kingdom, 22/06/2009. <http://www.library.ingentaconnect.com/content/ufaw/aw/2010/00000019/A00102s1/art00004>

APA

Sandøe, P., D'eath, RB., Lawrence, AB., Conington, J., & Olsson, IAS. (2009). Breeding for behavioural change in farm animails: practical and ethical considerations. In Darwinian selection, selective breeding and the welfare of animals. UFAW International Symposium 2009: Wheathampstead http://www.library.ingentaconnect.com/content/ufaw/aw/2010/00000019/A00102s1/art00004

Vancouver

Sandøe P, D'eath RB, Lawrence AB, Conington J, Olsson IAS. Breeding for behavioural change in farm animails: practical and ethical considerations. In Darwinian selection, selective breeding and the welfare of animals. UFAW International Symposium 2009: Wheathampstead. 2009

Author

Sandøe, Peter ; D'eath, RB ; Lawrence, AB ; Conington, J ; Olsson, IAS. / Breeding for behavioural change in farm animails : practical and ethical considerations. Darwinian selection, selective breeding and the welfare of animals. UFAW International Symposium 2009: Wheathampstead. 2009.

Bibtex

@inbook{0253d4b0e5a011deba73000ea68e967b,
title = "Breeding for behavioural change in farm animails: practical and ethical considerations",
abstract = "In farm animal breeding, behavioural traits are rarely included in selection programmes despite their potential to improve animal production and welfare. Breeding goals have been broadened beyond production traits in most farm animal species to include health and functional traits, and opportunities exist to increase the inclusion of behaviour in breeding indices. On a technical level, breeding for behaviour presents a number of particular challenges compared to physical traits. It is much more difficult and time-consuming to directly measure behaviour in a consistent and reliable manner in order to evaluate the large numbers of animals necessary for a breeding programme. For this reason, the development and validation of proxy measures of key behavioural traits is often required. Despite these difficulties, behavioural traits have been introduced by certain breeders. For example, ease of handling is now included in some beef cattle breeding programmes. While breeding for behaviour is potentially beneficial, ethical concerns have been raised. Since animals are adapted to the environment rather than the other way around, there may be a loss of 'naturalness' and/or animal integrity. Some examples, such as breeding for good maternal behaviour, could enhance welfare, production and naturalness, although dilemmas emerge where improved welfare could result from breeding away from natural behaviour. Selection against certain behaviours may carry a risk of creating animals which are generally unreactive ('zombies'), although such broad effects could be measured and controlled. Finally, breeding against behavioural measures of welfare could inadvertently result in resilient animals ('stoics') that do not show behavioural signs of low welfare yet may still be suffering. To prevent this, other measures of the underlying problem should be used, although cases where this is not possible remain troubling. ",
author = "Peter Sand{\o}e and RB D'eath and AB Lawrence and J Conington and IAS Olsson",
year = "2009",
language = "English",
booktitle = "Darwinian selection, selective breeding and the welfare of animals. UFAW International Symposium 2009",
note = "null ; Conference date: 22-06-2009 Through 23-06-2009",

}

RIS

TY - ABST

T1 - Breeding for behavioural change in farm animails

AU - Sandøe, Peter

AU - D'eath, RB

AU - Lawrence, AB

AU - Conington, J

AU - Olsson, IAS

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - In farm animal breeding, behavioural traits are rarely included in selection programmes despite their potential to improve animal production and welfare. Breeding goals have been broadened beyond production traits in most farm animal species to include health and functional traits, and opportunities exist to increase the inclusion of behaviour in breeding indices. On a technical level, breeding for behaviour presents a number of particular challenges compared to physical traits. It is much more difficult and time-consuming to directly measure behaviour in a consistent and reliable manner in order to evaluate the large numbers of animals necessary for a breeding programme. For this reason, the development and validation of proxy measures of key behavioural traits is often required. Despite these difficulties, behavioural traits have been introduced by certain breeders. For example, ease of handling is now included in some beef cattle breeding programmes. While breeding for behaviour is potentially beneficial, ethical concerns have been raised. Since animals are adapted to the environment rather than the other way around, there may be a loss of 'naturalness' and/or animal integrity. Some examples, such as breeding for good maternal behaviour, could enhance welfare, production and naturalness, although dilemmas emerge where improved welfare could result from breeding away from natural behaviour. Selection against certain behaviours may carry a risk of creating animals which are generally unreactive ('zombies'), although such broad effects could be measured and controlled. Finally, breeding against behavioural measures of welfare could inadvertently result in resilient animals ('stoics') that do not show behavioural signs of low welfare yet may still be suffering. To prevent this, other measures of the underlying problem should be used, although cases where this is not possible remain troubling.

AB - In farm animal breeding, behavioural traits are rarely included in selection programmes despite their potential to improve animal production and welfare. Breeding goals have been broadened beyond production traits in most farm animal species to include health and functional traits, and opportunities exist to increase the inclusion of behaviour in breeding indices. On a technical level, breeding for behaviour presents a number of particular challenges compared to physical traits. It is much more difficult and time-consuming to directly measure behaviour in a consistent and reliable manner in order to evaluate the large numbers of animals necessary for a breeding programme. For this reason, the development and validation of proxy measures of key behavioural traits is often required. Despite these difficulties, behavioural traits have been introduced by certain breeders. For example, ease of handling is now included in some beef cattle breeding programmes. While breeding for behaviour is potentially beneficial, ethical concerns have been raised. Since animals are adapted to the environment rather than the other way around, there may be a loss of 'naturalness' and/or animal integrity. Some examples, such as breeding for good maternal behaviour, could enhance welfare, production and naturalness, although dilemmas emerge where improved welfare could result from breeding away from natural behaviour. Selection against certain behaviours may carry a risk of creating animals which are generally unreactive ('zombies'), although such broad effects could be measured and controlled. Finally, breeding against behavioural measures of welfare could inadvertently result in resilient animals ('stoics') that do not show behavioural signs of low welfare yet may still be suffering. To prevent this, other measures of the underlying problem should be used, although cases where this is not possible remain troubling.

M3 - Conference abstract in proceedings

BT - Darwinian selection, selective breeding and the welfare of animals. UFAW International Symposium 2009

Y2 - 22 June 2009 through 23 June 2009

ER -

ID: 16214998